Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wonga/Barker and Lowe - HAVE SENT THE BAILIFFS?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5035 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I wanted to run this one past you and to garner some feeback on your thoughts.

 

I had a phonecall from my mum in work today who said she had seen 3 people knock on the door with a letter in their hand and after a couple of knocks and waiting they departed together and jumped into a car and drove off. She is absolutely convinced these were bailiffs knocking at the door and as a result I am receiving it in the neck.

 

The only culprit I can think of is Wonga who I have a plan of £80 per month on a £200 loan turned into £420 with their immoral interst. I only paid £40 last month and gave valid reasons why. I never received an email from the guy I was dealing with, even after I fowarded the email on again 3 days later.

 

I have received no court orders or letters threatening bailiffs so I think its is a bit of long shot to be honest, has anyone else had similar problems akin to this?

 

Cheers

 

W

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have had a client in a similar situation which like you was not awear of any situation that could have called for such actions. How long has mum lived at her address?

I say this as my client had baliff's which actually where chasing the last proprietor>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just a thought!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have lived for over 24 years at the property. It would have to be linked to the Wonga debt if anything at all. I am no longer on the electoral roll now anyway so I cant see how they can even try and force entry.

 

As far as I am concerned they need a court order to even try and entertain bailiffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

it would have to got to court for bailiffs to be involved.

and that would take weeks not 1 week

and you'ed know about it

 

and i dont think they use local colllectors either.

 

i doubt if it is linked.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously sounds like they might be going to make you bankrupt by serving a statutory demand, which can be easily challenged as the courts frown on companies trying this route.

 

Wonga are known for underhand tactics so get in touch with Trading Standards and report them, they CANNOT send in a bailiff without a court order, although they try and use Marstons or Phillips as collection services, although these are Bailiff companies they are only common debt collectors in this instance.

 

Whatever you do get the letter scanned without your details and let us have a look at it.... I bet it is either a dodgy default notice or a 'pretend' "We need to gain entry to your premises to finalise an arrangement with you" style letter.

 

Both are way out of line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

after getting into debt with wonga i ploughed through lots of excellent forums like this,and i can confidently tell you what happens..stick to your guns and you will NEVER have to phone them,you can do it by email like i did,or by post.give them a repayment plan YOU can afford,again stick to your guns and if its not a ridicuously small amount they will eventually agree.they send out bogus solicitors letters like barker and lowe that dont exist..its just another person at wonga. if no agreement is reached they will give the debt to a collection agency,this is the time to act..you will be able to repay the debt at a MUCH LOWER MONTHLY RATE than with wonga.your wonga debt will expand rapidly at first so if you can pay them off in full its cheaper.realistically though if like me you cant pay in full,they are only allowed to charge interest for 60 days.WONGA DONT SEND BALLIFFS ROUND!

Link to post
Share on other sites

after getting into debt with wonga i ploughed through lots of excellent forums like this,and i can confidently tell you what happens..stick to your guns and you will NEVER have to phone them,you can do it by email like i did,or by post.give them a repayment plan YOU can afford,again stick to your guns and if its not a ridicuously small amount they will eventually agree.they send out bogus solicitors letters like barker and lowe that dont exist..its just another person at wonga. if no agreement is reached they will give the debt to a collection agency,this is the time to act..you will be able to repay the debt at a MUCH LOWER MONTHLY RATE than with wonga.your wonga debt will expand rapidly at first so if you can pay them off in full its cheaper.realistically though if like me you cant pay in full,they are only allowed to charge interest for 60 days.WONGA DONT SEND BALLIFFS ROUND!

 

At what point will you get a default against your credit file though? Can that be avoided by dealing with Wonga directly before it goes to a DCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

 

they only way to avoid a late payment marker is to pay.

 

a default notice is a diff matter, they HAVE to go through a set process.

 

dont get confused between a 'late payment marker' [which is NOT a default] and a default notice.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

 

they only way to avoid a late payment marker is to pay.

 

a default notice is a diff matter, they HAVE to go through a set process.

 

dont get confused between a 'late payment marker' [which is NOT a default] and a default notice.

 

dx

 

Yes I am getting confused, I assumed a DN was automatic once you've failed to honour an original agreement.

 

Does that mean if a suitable repayment arrangement is made (even through a DCA?), a DN itself can be avoided? I'm not bothered about late payment markers, I understand that can't be avoided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you pay the required amount on the DN bythe date they ask [which MUST be a date not 14 days from this letter]

then they can take no action.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Hi,

 

I wanted to run this one past you and to garner some feeback on your thoughts.

 

I had a phonecall from my mum in work today who said she had seen 3 people knock on the door with a letter in their hand and after a couple of knocks and waiting they departed together and jumped into a car and drove off. She is absolutely convinced these were bailiffs knocking at the door and as a result I am receiving it in the neck.

 

The only culprit I can think of is Wonga who I have a plan of £80 per month on a £200 loan turned into £420 with their immoral interst. I only paid £40 last month and gave valid reasons why. I never received an email from the guy I was dealing with, even after I fowarded the email on again 3 days later.

 

I have received no court orders or letters threatening bailiffs so I think its is a bit of long shot to be honest, has anyone else had similar problems akin to this?

 

Cheers

 

W

 

You've got nothing to worry about - no link to Wonga - i have never seen a case where they have taken anyone to court - they dont have the brains or the man power for it. Basically they'll sell your debt on and you can then arrange payments.

 

Also, you should try and make some sort of arrangement in writing with them so you can get the debt off your chest... But remember - you pay them direct and dont give them your card details whatsoever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Can anyone who has received these letters from barker & lowe make complaints to the Fos as it's unnecessary harassment and misleading. The more complaints lodge the more pressure on the ombudsman to take action against these clowns

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...