Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. As you say, appealing this ticket doesn't help as these people hardly ever accept appeals. They don't care how difficult someone's life is, they just want the money. The forum guys should be along later with thoughts for you on how to deal with this. Best, HB
    • I have received an email in the last 10 minutes 4) The Claimant's witness is currently out of the office on annual leave and this was not relayed to DWF Law until after the event which has caused a further unfortunate delay. 5) The Court has directed parties to file and serve any evidence upon which they intend to rely not later than 14- days before the hearing i.e. by 4pm on 6 June 2024. Regrettably, the Claimant will have insufficient time to finalise their witness evidence and supporting exhibits as directed. We therefore respectfully apply to extend the time for filing/serving evidence so that the evidence upon which the parties intend to rely by filed and served not later than 7-days before the hearing i.e. by 4pm on 13 June 2024  It also includes a "Notice of Hearing" stating that the application hearing will take place on 13th June at 10.00am.  Confused as to whether I need to attend this ?
    • I've received this notice to keeper. I work for the NHS and was delayed due to patient care. I park here regular and and have never had any issues. I've looked at the evidence on the portal and other than showing that i entered at 12.59.33 and departed at 17:14:14 it doesn't state how long i overstayed for. I paid for 4 hours parking over the phone which i wont have done till i got parked but as its over the phone i have no receipt or record but it is not possible for me to have been in excess of 15mins from the photos alone but I'm unsure having read other threads whether grace periods are 10 or 15 minutes. I havent appealed yet but and was about to but in appealing i'm showing i'm the driver which i gather is something you state we must never do. I don't like confrontation but £60 seems extortionate. Hope you can help. 🤞 1 Date of the infringement 30th May 2024 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 30th May 2024 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s 3 Date received 5th June 2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No reference to schedule 4 just says"...we the creditor reserve the right to recover unpaid parking charges from the registered keeper in accordance with POFA 2012." 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up NA 7 Who is the parking company? Carpark securities 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Northgate, Halifax Former Dews Car Park HX1 1XJ For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   Notice to Keeper.pdf
    • It never seems to amaze me how the chuckleheads think that No Stopping can ever offer a contract when it is prohibitory. In any case you did not accept the contract by entering the land, you entered the land to get to the airport for goodness sake. In most car parks there is a Consideration period that allows motorists to decide whether they want to stay in the car park . Here on a road, there is no consideration period and whether the motorist finds the terms agreeable or not even assuming that they are able to understand that they are being hoodwinked into believing they are being offered a  contract they cannot turn back. They have a plane to catch and even if they did turn back because they didn't accept the  No Stopping term of   the so called contract they would still have had to stop to turn around. Plus there is a question of Frustration of Contract. You had to stop at a pedestrian crossing .    
    • Just a couple paragraphs their WS that it might be useful to refer to specifically in the OP's WS... Para 6 A contract was formed with "the driver" of the vehicle. Para 8 "The driver" accepted the contract. (The "driver" is not named, or identified anywhere in the WS). Para 7 WHY would there ever be a "no stopping" restriction in a car park? (In Para 10, they specify that it is a "car park"). Para 11 "The Defendant" became liable." Again, they have not shown that the Defendant was "the driver", simply the keeper. Para 20 "It is a matter of agreement"? Not really sure what they're trying to say here...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You need to ensure that you resend the Out of Time Declaration. This can be done even though you have paid the bailiff. If the application is refused, please post... back but in any event, you should appeal any refusal.

 

You need to WRITE back to the council and you should mark your letter as a FORMAL COMPLAINT and it should be addressed to the CHIEF EXECUTIVE. By doing this, your letter will be officially logged as a Complaint.

 

Whilst writing, you need to address the matter of the lack of a Contract with Davies Enforcement and you should ask them to confirm whether they have a Service Level Agreement (SLA) and if so, when was it signed.

 

This matter most certainly warrants a Formal Complaint.

 

 

 

Have you resent the Out of Time Application. You really should be doing this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sadly - for those needing to contact an MP - you will only be able to do so until Sunday.

Monday sees the dissolution of Parliament when all MPs effectively stand down from the role [i presume constituency work is on pause]. Whilst paid until the election, they are not MPs per se until they are voted in again. [Parliament effectively stands empty during this period].

Best wishes

rae.

 

[TTs post reminds me to say: Any advice I give is alongside and in addition to any advice that needs following from others. I only advise on the small area I know...]

Edited by RaeUK
small print...
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rae

 

Thanks. Perhaps MP's may do more as there is an election looming. I live in a conservative ward and MP is Labour, perhaps he may feel like trying to win more votes.

 

I cannot get over the fact that the council favor Davies Enforcement and are 3 times more likely to refer to them over other providers. My council is a member of something I think is called Kent parking. It is a consortium of neighboring local authorities who have chosen to use the same policies and procedures as all the other authorities to ensure parity in Kent. I will write to the other authorities under the Freedom of Information Act to see he breakdown of cases given to each baliff company. I will ask also how they allocate cases and see what comes back.

 

I will ring the Ombudsman tomorrow and ask them to investigate.

 

Thanks for all your help.

 

Best wishes

 

linda jane

 

 

Is the SLA with Davies Enforcement or with Davies Enforcement LTD?

 

The Limited Company by this name was DISSOLVED in December 2008. They last filed accounts in 2004 !!! Google searches will also show that they were in business as certificated bailiffs.....

 

Any bailiff company collecting and banking money on behalf of a local authority should surely be expected to file accounts....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly - for those needing to contact an MP - you will only be able to do so until Sunday.

Monday sees the dissolution of Parliament when all MPs effectively stand down from the role [i presume constituency work is on pause]. Whilst paid until the election, they are not MPs per se until they are voted in again. [Parliament effectively stands empty during this period].

Best wishes

rae.

 

[TTs post reminds me to say: Any advice I give is alongside and in addition to any advice that needs following from others. I only advise on the small area I know...]

 

Thanks Rae,

 

I was not aware of this. I will contact my MP today at the houses of parliament email address. I did contact him before regarding another matter and he responded the very same day.

 

Kind Regards

 

lindajane

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the SLA with Davies Enforcement or with Davies Enforcement LTD?

 

The Limited Company by this name was DISSOLVED in December 2008. They last filed accounts in 2004 !!! Google searches will also show that they were in business as certificated bailiffs.....

 

Any bailiff company collecting and banking money on behalf of a local authority should surely be expected to file accounts....

 

Hi

 

Another user on this site advised me that Davies Enforcement are registered at companies house as Lockstock Limited trading as Davies Enforcement.

 

I have in the past written bids for local authority and central government contracts and fail to see how such a company would ordinarily get past a PQQ especially if it is the same company re-invented. Something feels very wrong and I will contact my MP today and make Freedom of Information requests to all the neighboring councils.

 

Why would a council refer 3 times as many cases to one company when there has been no competitive tendering exercise?

 

Kind regards

 

lindajane

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The saga complicates further.

 

Davies Enforcement are a trading name for Loxstock Limited. So we have Davies Enforcement a trading name for Lockstock Limited (company apparently dissolved for not filing accounts), Davies Enforcement dissolved in December 2008 for not filing accounts.

 

I am trying to search the records of companies house but am having difficulties with their site. I will try later.

 

It feels very strange.

 

 

lindajane

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been in contact with my MP today and he responded straight away and is going to investigate the case.

 

I have found out that the London Borough of Richmond gave Davies Enforcement Limited a contract just 2 months before they were struck off in December 2008 for failing to submit returns for 4 years.

 

I have written to Richmond today to question why.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been in contact with my MP today and he responded straight away and is going to investigate the case.

 

I have found out that the London Borough of Richmond gave Davies Enforcement Limited a contract just 2 months before they were struck off in December 2008 for failing to submit returns for 4 years.

 

I have written to Richmond today to question why.

 

My PERSONAL opinion is this:

 

A bailiff company has a very unique position in that they can enter a debtors home ( peacefully) and remove goods and be paid for doing so. All of this is as a result of him being given a warrant that has been authorised by a Court. Any money he collects (after deducting his fees) is for the benefit of the local authority.

 

For this reason, I can see NO REASON whatsoever why any bailiff company would be allowed to get away with not filing accounts for even one year...let alone 3 years!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ervices Contract Award Notice

 

 

SECTION I: CONTRACTING AUTHORITY

 

 

I.1) OFFICIAL NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY Official name: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames, Postal Address: 2nd Floor Regal House, Town: Twickenham, Telephone: 020 8831 6372, E-mail: [email protected], Contact Point(s): , For the attention of: Philip Carmichael, Postal Code: TW1 3QB, Country: UNITED KINGDOM, Fax: 020 8891 7798, General address of the contracting authority (URL): Home page - London Borough of Richmond upon Thames, Address of the Buyer Profile (URL): London Borough of Richmond upon Thames - Procurement Portal

I.2) TYPE OF THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY AND MAIN ACTIVITY OR ACTIVITES Regional or local authority

If 'other' please specify

I.2.1) MAIN ACTIVITY OR ACTIVITIES

General Public Services

If 'other' please specify

I.2.2) The contracting authority is purchasing on behalf of other contracting authorities?

SECTION II: OBJECT OF THE CONTRACT

 

 

II.1)TYPE OF CONTRACT Services

II.1.1) TITLE ATTRIBUTED TO THE CONTRACT BY THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY UK-Twickenham: Provision of Collection Services

II.1.2) Service category Number 27.

II.1.2.1) In case of contract for service categories 17 to 27 (see Annex B), do you agree to the publication of this notice? Yes

II.1.2.2) Main place of performance

II.1.2.3) NUTS Code

II.1.3) The notice involves (if applicable)

II.1.4) Short description of the contract or purchase(s) Collection of unpaid Penalty Charge Notices and associated costs issued under the Road Traffic Act 1991 as amended Bailiff services.

II.1.5) Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV)

Main Object: 75242110.

II.1.6) Contract covered by the Government Procurement Agreement(GPA)? No

II.2.1) Total final value of contract(s)

Value

OR Lowest Offer

AND Highest Offer to be taken into consideration

Currency

Including VAT

If yes, specify VAT rate(%)

SECTION IV: PROCEDURE

 

 

IV.1) TYPE OF PROCEDURE Restricted

IV.1.1) Justification for the choice of negotiated procedure without prior call for competition

In order to benefit from the time-limit referred to above, in addition to the box(es) to be ticked above, please explain in a clear and comprehensive manner why the award of the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union is lawful, by stating any case the relevant facts and, as appropriate, the conclusions of law in accordance with the Articles in Directive 2004/18/EC (500 words maximum).

IV.2) AWARD CRITERIA B) The most economically advantageous tender in terms of:

B1) the criteria as stated below:

1) Proven record of customer satisfaction. Weighting: 30%.

2) Acceptable dispute process. Weighting: 30%.

3) Price. Weighting: 20%.

4) Previous experience in Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) collection. Weighting: 10%.

5) UK Local Government references or equivalent. Weighting: 10%.

In descending order of priority: No.

 

IV.2.2) An electronic auction has been used

IV.3) Administrative Information

VI.3.1) File reference number attributed by the contracting authority (if applicable)

IV.3.2) Previous publication concerning the same contract

IV.3.2.1) Other previous publications

 

Notice number in OJ:

Of

 

Notice number in OJ:

Of

 

Notice number in OJ:

Of

 

Notice number in OJ:

Of

SECTION V: AWARD OF CONTRACT

 

 

V.1) AWARD AND CONTRACT VALUE CONTRACT NO: 1

TITLE UK-Twickenham: Provision of Collection Services

V.1) DATE OF CONTRACT AWARD: 15/05/2008

V.2) NUMBER OF OFFERS RECEIVED: 17

 

V.3) Name and address of economic operator to whom the contract has been awarded

Official name: Equita Ltd, Postal Address: 42-44 Henry Street, Town: Northampton, Telephone: 01604 885566, E-Mail: [email protected], For the attention of: Stephen Brown, Postal code: NN1 4BZ, Country: UNITED KINGDOM, Fax: , Internet address (URL):

V.4) Information on value of contract

V.4.1) Initial estimated total value of the contract:

, currency: , Including VAT: Rate: %

V.4.2) Total final value of the contract:

Value:

OR Lowest offer:

/ highest offer:

Currency:

Including VAT: Rate: %

V.4.3) Annual or monthly value

Number of years OR Number of Months

V.5.1) Is the contract likely to be sub-contracted?

If yes, state value or proportion of the contract likely to be sub-contracted to third parties

Value (excluding VAT):

Currency:

Proportion (percentage):

Not known:NO

V.5.2) Short description of the value/proportion of the contract to be sub-contracted:

CONTRACT NO: 2

TITLE UK-Twickenham: Provision of Collection Services

V.1) DATE OF CONTRACT AWARD: 15/05/2008

V.2) NUMBER OF OFFERS RECEIVED: 17

 

V.3) Name and address of economic operator to whom the contract has been awarded

Official name: Lockstock Ltd T/A Davies Enforcement, Postal Address: 137-143 High Street, Town: Sutton Surrey, Telephone: 0845 4580217, E-Mail: [email protected], For the attention of: Karl Smith, Postal code: SM1 1JH, Country: UNITED KINGDOM, Fax: , Internet address (URL):

V.4) Information on value of contract

V.4.1) Initial estimated total value of the contract:

, currency: , Including VAT: Rate: %

V.4.2) Total final value of the contract:

Value:

OR Lowest offer:

/ highest offer:

Currency:

Including VAT: Rate: %

V.4.3) Annual or monthly value

Number of years OR Number of Months

V.5.1) Is the contract likely to be sub-contracted?

If yes, state value or proportion of the contract likely to be sub-contracted to third parties

Value (excluding VAT):

Currency:

Proportion (percentage):

Not known:NO

V.5.2) Short description of the value/proportion of the contract to be sub-contracted:

 

SECTION VI: COMPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

 

 

VI.1) CONTRACT RELATED TO A PROJECT AND/OR PROGRAMME FINANCED BY EU FUNDS?

If yes, reference to project(s) and/or programme(s):

VI.2) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (if applicable) GO reference: GO 08121035/01

VI.3.1) Body responsible for appeal procedures (if applicable)

Body responsible for mediation procedures (if applicable)

VI.3.2) Lodging of appeals (please fill heading VI.3.2 OR, if need be, heading VI.3.3)

VI.3.3) Service from which information about the lodging of appeals may be obtained

VI.4) DATE OF DISPATCH OF THIS NOTICE 10/12/2008

 

 

END OF NOTICE

 

 

Return to Buyer Profile

 

 

 

 

E-mail: [email protected] | Terms of us

Link to post
Share on other sites

to your personal download area. Please read the ORDERING GUIDE for detailed instructions.

 

For company filing history please scroll down the page.

 

Company Reports Order

Current Appointments Report

No report required

 

 

 

 

indicates that this document contains the latest Statement of Capital

Company Filing History Include Allotment of Shares

 

Type Date Description Order

 

GAZ2 02/12/2008 STRUCK OFF AND DISSOLVED

 

GAZ1 30/07/2008 FIRST GAZETTE

 

DISS6 30/10/2007 STRIKE-OFF ACTION SUSPENDED

 

GAZ1 21/08/2007 FIRST GAZETTE

 

363a 03/04/2006 RETURN MADE UP TO 16/03/06; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS

 

288b 26/08/2005 DIRECTOR RESIGNED

 

AA 11/07/2005 TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL ACCOUNTS MADE UP TO 31/07/04

 

363s 07/06/2005 RETURN MADE UP TO 16/03/05; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS

 

363(287) 07/06/2005 REGISTERED OFFICE CHANGED ON 07/06/05

 

 

288a 20/10/2004 NEW SECRETARY APPOINTED

 

288b 20/10/2004 DIRECTOR RESIGNED

 

288b 20/10/2004 SECRETARY RESIGNED

 

363s 26/03/2004 RETURN MADE UP TO 16/03/04; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS

 

AA 06/02/2004 TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL ACCOUNTS MADE UP TO 31/07/03

 

AA 21/08/2003 TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL ACCOUNTS MADE UP TO 31/07/02

 

363s 25/03/2003 RETURN MADE UP TO 16/03/03; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS

 

AA 06/06/2002 TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL ACCOUNTS MADE UP TO 31/07/01

 

363s 20/03/2002 RETURN MADE UP TO 16/03/02; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS

 

AA 04/06/2001 ACCOUNTS FOR 'SMALL' CO. MADE UP TO 31/07/00

 

225 04/06/2001 ACC. REF. DATE SHORTENED FROM 31/08/00 TO 31/07/00

 

363s 21/03/2001 RETURN MADE UP TO 16/03/01; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS

 

225 14/11/2000 ACC. REF. DATE EXTENDED FROM 31/03/00 TO 31/08/00

 

288c 11/08/2000 SECRETARY'S PARTICULARS CHANGED;DIRECTOR'S PARTICULARS CHANGED

 

288c 11/08/2000 DIRECTOR'S PARTICULARS CHANGED

 

288c 11/08/2000 DIRECTOR'S PARTICULARS CHANGED

 

288c 11/08/2000 DIRECTOR'S PARTICULARS CHANGED

 

AA 23/03/2000 ACCOUNTS FOR 'SMALL' CO. MADE UP TO 31/03/99

 

363s 22/03/2000 RETURN MADE UP TO 16/03/00; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS

 

288c 25/10/1999 DIRECTOR'S PARTICULARS CHANGED

 

363s 22/03/1999 RETURN MADE UP TO 16/03/99; FULL LIST OF MEMBERS

 

288a 31/03/1998 NEW DIRECTOR APPOINTED

 

288a 31/03/1998 NEW DIRECTOR APPOINTED

 

288a 31/03/1998 NEW SECRETARY APPOINTED;NEW DIRECTOR APPOINTED

 

288a 31/03/1998 NEW DIRECTOR APPOINTED

 

288b 31/03/1998 DIRECTOR RESIGNED

 

288b 31/03/1998 SECRETARY RESIGNED

 

SRES01 30/03/1998 ALTER MEM AND ARTS 16/03/98

 

NEWINC 16/03/1998 INCORPORATION DOCUMENTS

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS & REGISTERED OFFICE

DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE

MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Before ordering please ensure you have suitable software:

Documents are provided as both multi page 'TIFF' images (to view a test image

click HERE), and as PDF's (a viewer can be downloaded from the Forms

Online screen).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...