Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If I haven't referred to it before then please check out this thread another case where the claimant contracted directly with Packlink for a courier delivery service carried out by Evri. Please read this thread very carefully and eventually you will get to a point where the claimant – our OP – discovered some interesting terms and conditions and has referred to them in his case. He incorporated these into his witness statement and was given judgement – not on the basis of rights of third parties but on the basis of direct responsibility. I would suggest that use the witness statement as a model although we will want to see it before you file it off. When you find the particular post with the witness statement, please can you post a link to it here as well as a copy of the witness statement because I don't have the time to look for it at the moment and the thread is rather long. However it is very important to you and you should go through it very carefully indeed. We have applied for a transcript of the judgement and hopefully it will be along in six weeks or so. As soon as we receive it we will make it available on this sub- forum.
    • Yes they are criminal charges. The law requires you to stop/report if "...owing to the presence of a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place an accident occurs by which— [injury or damage to a third party or their property is caused]. "I would be disinclined at this stage to offer anything more than you do not believe any such accident took place.  You could provide a brief description of the altercation in an attempt to explain why another party might be making these allegations. I know it's a silly question, but are you sure that you did not collide with anything? Could you have mistaken hitting something for the other party thumping your car? Could it be that you passing closely caused him to damage something somehow?  
    • Thank you. They insisted that they claim they have an "allocated settlement" figure per day. Make a note of this and make sure it gets into your witness statement and onto the judge. This is a scandal and even more evidence of the abuse of the system. It has nothing to do with justice. It is purely economic's for them. Once again, insist on seeing their contract with Packlink. You shouldn't take their word for anything without evidence. Also standby as I will post a link to a similar case where a very interesting discovery has been made about Packlink's terms and conditions and how Evri are responsible to you in any event. We are applying for judgement on that. It will take about six weeks. I'm sure it will be available by the time you go to trial. Also, it is outrageous that they wasted your time and the mediator's time agreeing to compromise when they already had a fixed sum in mind. This is not about compromise, this is about setting a condition from which they will not move. This is an abuse of the court process. It is an abuse of the mediation process. Make sure it all goes into the witness statement. The judge needs to know  
    • Update: they actually showed up to mediation this time. The mediator seemed pretty understanding that I had a previous claim with Evri last year where they didn't show up to mediation and ended up settling in full before court. And how evri are infamous for following this "dragging out protocol" even when they will lose. Evri spoke the usual speil of my contract is with packlink not them, to which i briefly explain to the mediator the Rights of Third Parties Act 1999 etc. Best they could offer was a "goodwill guesture" of £20 plus covering the court fees so £55 total. Said they have an "allocated settlement amount per day". the mediator could already tell it wasn't going nowhere so we had no deal.
    • The payer is not responsible for registering and making sure that VAT is charged correctly.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bailiffs (Phoenix) and Council tax - please help.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5071 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I appreciate it is difficult given the quality & quantity of replies one here. I believe you need to go back to the beginning and put everything into chronological order. The reason I suggest the Leader of the Council is if you are getting nowhere with your own Councillor then the Leader should be able to exert some reasoning over them. Of course it may be that all the Councillors believe the actions of their Officers and Contractors are correct in which case you have a problem - particularly if they all speak Bailiff.

 

A way forward in my opinion is to get one of them to look at this site and your own thread. They should be then able to grasp some of what has gone on. A very interested Journalist can have the same effect.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

HI All

i have a bit of an emergency as the bailiffs have now turned up at the door to "remve goods" - i told them that i have a dispute with the council.

 

i told him i was not letting him in and he said he will return with the

lock smith.

 

i have also requested the magistrates court to serve a summons on the council by virtue of regulation 46 Council tax (Administration and enforcement) Regs 1992

 

immediate worry is the bailiff - i dont want him to return with lock smith and force entry.

 

furthermore i have my old aunt here.

 

i am, of course notifying the council that i have requested the magistrates court to serve a summons.

 

got to go serve the letter on the court so hoefully i'll hear from you soon.

 

thanks/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI All,

 

since my post earlier, i hv delivered the letter to the magistrates court.

in the meantime, i had a doctors appointment and unfortunately broke down whiilst seeing my doctor - having explained all my problems.

 

he gave me a sick note and took me off work for 3 months and some serious medication and advised that i can apply for Employment Eupport Allowance and various benefits which i am in a process of doing.

 

no further news so far from the bailiffs.

 

look forward to hearing from soon.

 

thanks/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

told him i was not letting him in and he said he will return with the

lock smith.

 

CODE OF PRACTICE

ON

LOCAL AUTHORITIES' USE OF BAILIFFS

IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF LOCAL TAXES

UPDATE & amendmentlink3.gif SHEET

April 2000

p5 Forcing re-entry

The law upon the rights of bailiffs to force re-entry to premises in order to remove

goods previously seized has recently been clarified. In Khazanchi v Faircharm

Investments; McLeod v Butterwick [1998] 2 All ER 901 the Court of Appeal held that

bailiffs may only force re-entry where they are being deliberately excluded from

premises. It will thus be necessary in most cases for the bailiff to notify the debtor in

advance of the date and time of the visit in order to remove. If the debtor is then

absent from home, or refuses entry, force may be employed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hallowitch,

 

Thanks for your post. I guess that clears the matter. The bailiffs can gain entry as long as they notify me the date and time in advance.

 

But in my case - there are the following

 

a) i have a vulnerable person

b) I did not sign a wlaking posession agreement

c) the notice of siezure is incorrectly completed - in that they have applied a global levy

 

so how do i apply these - i have already notified the council and copied the bailiffs? I have also been to the local police adn showed them the Walking possession agreement. The police said that the levy was improper and global. They also remarked that the signature was not like mine!!

but they cannot do anything as its a civil matter.

 

I am writing letters of complaint to the CEO and the councillor and that all takes time. But in the meantime where do I stand and how do i try and stop the bailiffs from returning with a locksmith?

 

thanks again

BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hallowitch,

 

Thanks for your post. I guess that clears the matter. The bailiffs can gain entry as long as they notify me the date and time in advance.

 

But in my case - there are the following

 

a) i have a vulnerable person

b) I did not sign a wlaking possession agreement

c) the notice of seizure is incorrectly completed - in that they have applied a global levy

 

so how do i apply these - i have already notified the council and copied the bailiffs? I have also been to the local police adn showed them the Walking possession agreement. The police said that the levy was improper and global. They also remarked that the signature was not like mine!!

but they cannot do anything as its a civil matter.

 

I am writing letters of complaint to the CEO and the councillor and that all takes time. But in the meantime where do I stand and how do i try and stop the bailiffs from returning with a locksmith?

 

thanks again

BF

 

 

your doing the correct thing complain to the CEO

 

the council would have to approve re-entry and the removal of goods

to be honest i cant see that happening in the near future

 

are you making payments to anyone concerning this debt if you are not

start paying the council as much as you can afford even if you have to use postal orders sending it by recorded delivery letter with a letter informing them the order is to pay xxx debt and not this current years council tax

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hallowitch,

i sent them an email notifying that i have now got a sick note and that i shall be apply for various benefits

 

Regarding payments to the council - they told me not to send them any payments to them - but to the bailiff. so should i just make the payment by cheque in favour of the council, but send the cheque to the bailiff?

 

i hv started preparing my letters to CEO and Concillor but these will take me time to do as i have to look for a new nursing home for my brother as the current hospital gave a deadline of 05 July.

 

many thanks/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hallowitch,

i sent them an email notifying that i have now got a sick note and that i shall be apply for various benefits

 

Regarding payments to the council - they told me not to send them any payments to them - but to the bailiff. so should i just make the payment by cheque in favour of the council, but send the cheque to the bailiff?

 

i hv started preparing my letters to CEO and Concillor but these will take me time to do as i have to look for a new nursing home for my brother as the current hospital gave a deadline of 05 July.

 

many thanks/BF

you can pay it online at the council website

Link to post
Share on other sites

send a letter to the council and tell them that due to a change of circumstance financial and personal you feel that you cant make an arrangement with phoenix to pay your council tax arrears

 

1) because you don't know how long it will take to sort out your benefits

you are therefore now not in a position to pay the substantial amounts the bailiff want weekly

2) Phoenix will not allow you pay this debt by standing order

3) you are in the process of moving your disabled brother who is long term care

4) there is a walking possession agreement on your goods the validity being questioned

5) you care for elderly disabled aunt and therefore you are not in a position of offer a weekly manual payment to the Phoenix as 1 day late and you will be charged van/fees and removal of goods they will cancel the agreement and expect you to pay the remainder of the debt within in days plus fees

6) bailiffs fees are deducted before council tax as the levy is being contested you feel it unreasonable to pay these fees before the actual debt

7)

Iam not refusing to pay this debt however for the reasons stated above i feel that i can not enter into any payment agreement with the Phoenix bailiff company that is Hallmarked to fail

 

I look forward to an early reply to this e-mail /letter

as i am anxious to get this situating resolved and a suitable sustainable payment agreement set up that will not be defaulted on by myself

 

 

 

Put the ball back in councils court send it to the Chief executive of your council

all you are asking for is a method payment that is sustainable in your circumstances without the constant threat of goods being removed with locksmith police etc demands for full payment

 

Be warned before you send it they may tell Phoenix to accept £5 week by standing order

Edited by hallowitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

just to keep u updated:

1. have written to leader of the council

2. hv been in real bad shape in the last couple of months and my doctor gave me a sick note for 3 months off work. so hv sent a copy of this to the council

3. wrote to magistrates court and requested them to issue a summons on the council as a result of their bailiffs serving me global levy and claiming i signed a walking possession order which i had not

4. notifed council of same

5. advised council that if their bailiff di return with a lock smith, my 88 year old aunt and i will not let them in

6. i hv also completed the housing benefit and council tax benefit caim form and Employment will try and submit these today

 

thanks to everyone and all the best/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

WE HAVE SUCCESS!!!!!!

 

I received an email from the Council that the debt has been recalled and no further action will be taken by the bailiffs. They said that as there has been no actual restraint on any of my goods they ask that i take no further action on the summons i requested the magistrataes court to issue. (under regulation 46 of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement)Regulations 1992.

 

so - the first battle is won and i am really grateful to everyone. Thank you, thank you, thank you. if it were not for your help, support, guidance - i would have gone mad!! i would not have had the strength and focus to keep going.

 

but the war goes on ....

 

they said that hopefully, i will qualify for council tax benefit, but there is no right to withhold payment of Council tax pending assessment.

 

Basically they said that if we cant come to a suitable arrangement, they will take deductions from Job seekers allowance or Income support etc. and ultimately put a charge on my house and send me to prison.

 

so what next? how do i negotiate with these guys to get them to accept my proposal. I am a little stunned at the moment.

 

thanks again .

 

All the best/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Seanamarts

 

many thanks for your fast contact.

 

basically, i just need some guidance on negotiating with the council on the repayment of the debt.

 

Do I just submit them a financial statement and a list of creditors and then offer a monthly sum?

 

many thanks/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

good news well done :D

 

as you are going to be on benefits for the next 3 months at least i would write and ask them to accept an interim payment plan of £5 per week to paid by standing order with a review in 3 months (when your sick benefit runs out)

Edited by hallowitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Do I just submit them a financial statement and a list of creditors and then offer a monthly sum?

 

many thanks/BF

 

Have they not already asked for this? It appears to me they are in a bit of disarray and don't know themselves the next steps. By all means they can ask what you propose to pay but if on benefits then they should realise that an Attachment to any allowable benefits is the way forward and when/if that source dries up move on to plan B. They should not be mentioning the charging order/prison route as they are towards the end of the chain. If they seek a committal hearing I would imagine the magistrate would tell them in view of your limited income payment that they set would be even lower than any Attachment of Benefits.

 

Hope that makes sense.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PT

 

Thanks for getting back - yes they hv asked for my financial statement - which i hv submitted by email but the scanned doc was not legible for them. I think thats the reason. Hard copy had been forwarded.

 

They have stated that they would attach to what ever benefit i get and they are also seeking commital hearing.

 

sorry i ommitted this infor in my earlier posting.

 

basically they really do have it "in" for me. I guess i caused a lot of problems for them having written to the various people CEO, Councillors etc. and threathening them with a writ for global levy.

 

thats why i was asking if i can get some guidance on how to negotiate with them now. Many thanks/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PT

 

Thanks for getting back - yes they hv asked for my financial statement - which i hv submitted by email but the scanned doc was not legible for them. I think thats the reason. Hard copy had been forwarded.

 

They have stated that they would attach to what ever benefit i get and they are also seeking commital hearing.

 

sorry i ommitted this infor in my earlier posting.

 

basically they really do have it "in" for me. I guess i caused a lot of problems for them having written to the various people CEO, Councillors etc. and threathening them with a writ for global levy.

 

thats why i was asking if i can get some guidance on how to negotiate with them now. Many thanks/BF

 

In reality there is not a lot they can do. Their Bailiffs cocked it all up from day one but would not admit it, the Council themselves need further training as of their own admission they believed the Bailiff.

 

It would probably be pointless at this stage going for a Committal Hearing if you are on Benefits particularly as they have an Attachments to Benefits - it would make them look rather silly if the Magistrate then lowers payment to £1 a week - which could happen. It would only be worth their while going for a Charging Order if they then make that an Order of Sale. Given their history the Council could become a laughing stock by throwing Ratepayers money at procedures they have no chance of winning.

 

I would wait and see what they come up with and then respond accordingly - let them make the running for now.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BF, just caught up with your thread.

Well, you're getting somewhere.

Don't even give credance to the 'threat' of committal. This is reserved for the VERY few who wilfully refuse to pay council tax. You can prove throughout this lengthy farce that, rather than refusing to pay, you were trying to negotiate the bailiffs and the councils incompetence and find a way to make sustainable and affordable payments. :)

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rae

Its great to see you. I thought you've done a runner like I was planning!!

Thanks for yr message - i know i am getting there, but Its been seroiusly demoralising and worrying to say the least.

 

But unfortunately - i "cracked" in the last week in june - and was quite sick. I went to see the doctor on 30 June - he took me off work and gave me a sick note for 3 months and some happy pills.

 

i got a letter from the council, i read it just to see the content but i am not really going to do anything about it till tomorrow evening then plan a reply - may be scan it for you to see and comment if you do not mind as it takes me time to do things at the moment.

 

I guess I am now at settlement negotiations with the council. I have applied for council tax reduction and carer of a disabled person discount. i have also applied for Employment Support Allowance. but in the interim, whilst my applications are being considered, i intend to make some payments to the Council (some money had trickled in to my company.)

 

I've also been onto CCCS (consumer credit counselling service) and they've given me some advice.

 

So this is a bit of a problem - its a pretty unfortunate time to crack but

there u go.

 

all the best/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...