Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the side street solely for access to your garages? who owns the land and thus the road? dx  
    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  There is a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.    I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!    What's the best thing to do?
    • yes might be the best idea. you'd only at best get 8% flat interest and that unusual on a GOGW if this was what it was. simply contact the FOS and let them know its resolved. dx  
    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help wanted.Restons / CCJ


ianjen
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks so much - yes if anyone is will to come along that would be great - really can't thank everyone for their support.

 

Court case will be held at Chester the home town of the MBNA!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah...Yes-this is the Court which actually referred the CCA cases (or a selection of them ) to Manchester.

 

So we can be CERTAIN its not something they are in the dark on.

We have had a few bad results from there-there was rumours that MBNA are a big employer and of course Chester is also home to those other sinister outfits like AK.

But dont let that put you off-it has certainly not put us off.

Good preparation and a will and determination to fight are a must.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will post out a shout for a Court Buddy for you.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ianjen, northampton must have accepted your payment proposals after looking at your income / expenditure section section of the origonal court papers or come to the decision themselves after seeing same paperwork therefore has anything changed to bring on the redtermination ? . What is shown on the paperwork asking for a redetermination ( length of time etc), the answers to these questions may help you build up a defence against redetermination if you were to accept origonal judgement.

sleepingdog

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a Notice of Transfer of Proceedings and states the following:

 

To all parties

 

This claim has been transferred to the Chester County Chourt for that court to deal with the claimant's application for redetermination.

 

That court will send you and the other parties notice of the time, date and place of hearing.

 

It is issued by Northampton CC

 

Nothing has changed from the original paperwork sent. The CCCS ran through our expenditure and updated it and sent us a copy to send with the initial Court Application

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ianjen, As I don't know the figures involved I guess that the payments that you were making to the DMP concerning the MNBA account would have meant that the length of time to fully repay would have taken 10s of years. If I am right then I am guessing that they want payment sooner by either a increase of payments or a charge on your home. If you are not fighting the origonal judgement then you need to be looking at why the payments should remain the same and also why the judgement should not be changed to forthwith.If you look into charging orders on this site it outlines what sort of objections to use , and if you look at threads on charging orders again you can get a lot of info on fighting the change of judgement to forthwith. If however you are thinking of fighting the origonal judgement then you will need to tackle this differently and therefore you need to look into either option and decide which way to proceed allowing posters to help you rather than possibly confuse you.

sleepingdog

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi we have just recieved the notice for our redetermination hearing 30/3/2010 @1045am

Now we need to work a defence but am still not sure which way to go

any help/advice welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just spent a couple of hours reading threads and come to the conclusion that what restons/mbna are really after is a charging order, if the judge turns this to a forthwith then they will get what they want.

Is there any mileage in the fact that the DNs were possibly incorrect so therefore the original ccj is invalid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ianjen, just because MBNA want the judgement changed to forthwith to allow them to go for a charging order does not mean that the judge will change it. You need to show how it affects other creditors ( are other debts higher than the MNBA largest debt) , that you have tried to deal with your debts (DMP) ,that you have been making regular payments to them that reflects your financial situation , is debt yours but house in both your names, do you have any positive equity in house etc.Even if they do get order changed to forthwith you can still fight charging order.

sleepingdog

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just spent a couple of hours reading threads and come to the conclusion that what restons/mbna are really after is a charging order, if the judge turns this to a forthwith then they will get what they want.

Is there any mileage in the fact that the DNs were possibly incorrect so therefore the original ccj is invalid

 

 

You could mention about the DN's at a Redetermination hearing but you may very well irritate a Judge, who will just tell you you should have applied for a Set Aside of the CCJ and then you could bring the defective DN's into play.

 

A Redetermination hearing is just that; a look at an application to redetermine the terms of the CCJ repayment.

I see sleepingdog has provided some excellent advice on this.

 

Have you given any thought about applying for a Set Aside seeing as you were incorrectly advised by CCCS ?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ianjen sorry to read of the troubles you are experiencing with this duo, have noticed another thread going through a similar situation to you at present & hope you will gather some information from it to help you.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/241308-redetermination-hearing-advice-pls.html

 

I hope you find it useful and wish you every success in getting this sorted soon.

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ianjen,

 

The link in the previous post is to my original thread.

So sorry to hear you are going through the same. We were also incorrectly advised by the CCCS and now we are fighting a CO on our home, or rather I am as it's my husband's cc debt.

Anyway, I have just started a new thread called Fighting CO MBNA/Restons so that has all the updated info.

 

In our redtermination hearing we had an awful judge who wasnt bothered that MBNA didnt turn up, wasnt interested that my husband had been paying the monthly instalments as set by northampton since Aug 2009.

:(

He then ordered Judgement Forthwith which of course we couldnt pay and now I am objection to this CO.

The default notice was also invalid.

MBNA have also faffed about for many months when we treid to find out about unfair charges etc, but none of this seemed to matter :(

They have 9 days left to respond to the SAR.

 

When we get back to court when the CO is made final this is when I need to object so this is my task now, get as much info as possible in my objection so that the final CO isnt made. I worry most about a forced sale.

It is his debt and he will pay it minus unfair charges hopefully.

Our circumstances are slowly improving and all our creditors are now getting increased payments but not MBNA/RESTONSas they didnt want to be part of our DMP in the first place and went straight for the CCJ.

Sigh.

 

I have everything crossed for you for your redetermination. I will subscribe to this to see how you go and lend an ear, I know exactly what it's like, it's been avery rough time for us and pressured learning all the legal jargon etc :(

 

Good luck, have a read of my new thread about fighting the CO. Hopefully we can support each other through this difficult time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Northstar, thank you for your support :) Our situation is very similar, this too is my husbands debt (but we are fighting together)

 

We are waiting for the subject access request from the MBNA but have not heard a peep out of them since we requested it over a week ago, but I suppose they have a few weeks to go yet.

 

However, we also applied to Restons (and the MBNA) for the CCA - Restons sent it back with the £1 postal order and saying the following:

 

Please find enclosed a DRAFT LETTER which purports to come from you but which is unsigned

You will appreciate that we must ensure we are corresponding with the correct person and that anyone requesting information is entitled to receive it.

Please ensure that all documentation is signed failing which we will not acknowledge receipt nor provide any response.

 

I also spoke with a guy from the CCCS about CO and the retermination hearing which is actually on the 30th and not the 31st as I said!!! They informed me to defend the payments the CCCS by stating that nothing has changed since Northampton CC so why did MBNA/Restons want a redetermination if that is all we can offer - he also stated to treat the CO like a secured loan on your property and not to worry about it!! Easy to say when it is not you that could end up with a CO!:(

 

I will check out your new thread and yes lets hope we can support each other - Jen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ianjen, one of my creditors tried to get a order changed to forthwith to allow a CO but I was able to fight it off , they have since stated that their client has a policy of keep applying to get a CO . Also one of my workmates had a CCJ ordered as forthwith with the view to the creditor getting a CO yet they were also able to get a redermination allowing the debt to be paid in instalments therefore stopping the CO so be positive .The fact that Restons are being unhelpful in regard to the CCA will have no relevence on the redermination ,and even if there was no agreement again it would not influence the redermination ,you would need to apply to have the CCJ set aside. On another note the CCCS advised me in my case that the creditors were entitled to apply for a CO and that they were likely to get it, luckily for me that wasn't the case and I must admit I was concerned at the advice I was given by the CCCS.

sleepingdog

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...