Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I plan to be honest to avoid any further trouble, tell them that the name should be changed to my official name
    • There is no evidence that I was issued a PCN that was placed on the car and removed. It seems that I was issued a £60 PCN on the 8th of March (the parking date) but it was never placed on my car, instead,  they allege that they posted the PCN on the 13th of March and deemed delivered on the 15th. I never got this 1st £60 PCN demand. I only know about all of this through the SAR. I only received the second PCN demanding £100, which was deemed delivered on 16/04/2024 - that is 39 days after the parking incident.  I did a little research and "Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations." as per London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The main issue is that I was not aware of the 1st £60 PCN as I didn't receive it - I'm not sure how this relates to the 28-day rule because that rule applies to the initial £60 PCN. PCM could say that "we sent him the letter by post and it was deemed delivered on the 15th of March" therefore the 28-day rule does not apply.  As regards the safety of the parking attendant, that is clearly something he chose to feel and he made the decision that his safety was threatened - I didn't even see him or had any interaction with him. I'm nearly 50 and I definitely don't look aggressive 😊  
    • okay will do. I'll let you know if anything transpires but once again - many thanks
    • Personally I would strongly suggest not risking going there with debts. Very possible you wont get back out again. And I know many in that position. Not jailed just unable to leave. the stories of Interpol in other countries sounds far fetched but in and out of Dubai is not a good idea. only two weeks ago a mate got stopped albeit a govt debt.
    • BTW the time in and out is less than 10 mins, more than 5 in case that's relevant? I saw an article posted on here about a year ago a proposed legislation change but i don't know if that went through or not? I'm also a blue badge holder but there it was a regular parking spot.   Private parking fines to be capped at £50 WWW.BBC.CO.UK Drivers will also need to be given a grace period for lateness, as part of a crackdown on parking firms.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Clarity working for CitiCard, now cabot !! - **You really couldn't make this up!!**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4910 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This will amuse and at the same time may infuriate...

In an attempt to settle a large and long outstanding credit card debt, I recently sent a full and final settlement cheque/letter to the DCA of 10p in the £. (A mob called Clarity working for CitiCard). It was slightly a tongue in cheek attempt as I didn't really expect it to work.

I also notated the cheque as well as making it clear in my letter that this was a full and final settlement payment. Obviously I retained copies.

Anyway, to my surprise and delight, they banked the cheque and it cleared my account last week.:)

Now this is the great bit...

They phoned me two days ago to say they made a mistake and shouldn't have banked the cheque and they're going send me back the money (direct into my account) and continue chasing me for the debt in full. :confused:

Am I going mad?

Anyone (especially those on here with some legal training) care to comment?

Tony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you state your payment was also in 'consideration' of an early settlement

 

If presenting a creditor with a full & final fait accompli it's important to also include a 'consideration' which can be either £1 or early settlement.

 

In the meantime maintain your position, debt paid & if they attempt to renege on the deal come back here

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

My letter made it clear that it was a "Full and Final Settlement". I didn't mention the word "consideration".

What should I do if the money finds its way back into my account? It could just end up going backwards and forwards between us. Should I just hang onto it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

additIn that case whilst I would maintain my position with them 'debt paid' I doubt a court will support you. The court will say you left them no choice but to accept your payment hence the need for a 'consideration' (additional benefit) for you to overcome any court objection

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its one to test if they return payment and continue to chase the debt.

 

Sorry I can't offer you more than recent case law.

 

Out of interest, how long ago did you send the cheque, how long before they presented it and how exactly did you word the settlement offer?

 

I have a feeling that they may have shot themselves in the foot, if they were of the belief that they had acted correctly they'd still be pursuing the balance prior to returning funds.

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its one to test if they return payment and continue to chase the debt.

 

Sorry I can't offer you more than recent case law.

 

Out of interest, how long ago did you send the cheque, how long before they presented it and how exactly did you word the settlement offer?

 

I have a feeling that they may have shot themselves in the foot, if they were of the belief that they had acted correctly they'd still be pursuing the balance prior to returning funds.

 

Gez

 

 

I agree. It may be that (mistakenly) they think they have boobed cos if they didn't they would as Gez states be simply chasing you for the balance

 

Also having banked the cheque they cannot now return the original which means you can return their cheque whilst continuing to argue F&F;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

The tale continues...

Some nine months after the DCA accepted my offer of payment (Clarity on behalf of CitiCard) and banked the cheque, I've had a letter from Cabot who have acquired the debt and are chasing me for the full sum due. They've also entered a default on my credit record.

I've sent them copies of the correspondence showing that the DCA accepted my offer.

Is there anything else I should be doing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The tale continues...

Some nine months after the DCA accepted my offer of payment (Clarity on behalf of CitiCard) and banked the cheque, I've had a letter from Cabot who have acquired the debt and are chasing me for the full sum due. They've also entered a default on my credit record.

I've sent them copies of the correspondence showing that the DCA accepted my offer.

Is there anything else I should be doing?

 

If Cabot have fully purchased the debt they are entitled to take over the default on your account, just make sure the date hasnt changed.

 

If you've maintained your position that the debt has been paid then we need to see what Cabot come back with, it might be worth raising a complaint with cabots local trading standards as if the debt is settled then its a breach of the oft debt collection guidelines to chase for more money, send trading standards the same letters you have cabt as proof.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

slight rename and move to citi forum.

 

dx

siteteam

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Followed the link at 6 but cannot find the details.

 

Any ideas?

 

Regards,

 

Bosun.

Please note: I have no formal qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...