Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ae - thanks for your interest.  It's quite overwhelming to keep reiterating the background.  I've lived through a lot and put a lot behind me.  There is one property - that has unresolved civil litigation.  It's been subject to lots of litigation - as explained (LH/FH).  I also explained the lender could've sold it immediately.  They chose not to.  The crux of the remaining litigation is focused on the steps they took and why I shouldn't be liable for their failures.  My counterclaim raises issues of criminality.  I'm very tired.  Exhausted with looking backwards.  The trial proceedings are at their end - I am now only trying to figure if I have an alternative angle by way of a separate complaint or claim v receiver AND how I can force a sale before the issue would be dealt with at trial.  (Aside: i'm still considering if I can complain v broker and need to follow up with sra on former lawyer negligence) I'm considering Bazza's comment about fmv - 
    • What is the £3500 debt based on, estimated or actual readings? You may have all been paying an amount each month by direct debit but that may not have covered your usage so you still owe a debt.  If you are joint tenants for the property, all five of you have joint and several liability for any debt owed so you alone can be pursued for the full amount or they can pursue all of you for the full amount.  You need to find out whether or not British Gas has billed you correctly and the amount claimed is correct. 
    • The charging order is a red herring. If the IVA fails because payments are stopped, the IVA practitioner can bankrupt the sister. Depending on the amount of equity in the property, if it's quite high, that's a very likely outcome. Advising the sister to just stop making payments is absolutely terrible advice.
    • Bazza - fair market value is definitely contentious.  Your comment has made me realise I must consider it in detail over the last few years alongside the steps lender/ receiver took. I've made a start
    • could might oh what by a useless restriction k. people should never enter into IVA's in the 1st place 90% goes on their fees. and all the debts are consumer ones too...    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Virgin Active + ARC + Trevor Munn Solicitors


Misty18
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4801 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have been reading alot of the same problems im having with gym memberships.

 

I have just received a letter from Trevor Munn Solicitors saying they are taking me to court which im happy with coz im not paying them, but just wondered has ayone been taken to court by these people and what was the results?

 

Many thanks for any info!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi.

 

I've had dealings with Trevor Munn threatening court action. If you read the letter they sent carefully, it won't actually say they're taking you to court, it'll say something along the lines of they 'are preparing papers for submission to Northhampton County Court.'

 

I had a problem with David lloyd leisure, ARC (A real shower of ****s) and dodgy Trevor Munn.

 

I'll bet a pound to a bucket of slurry they won't take you to court, you don't say how much it's for, but generally, they bank on the threats, if they don't work then they either go away or sell it to a more local debt management firm.

 

A tip for you. In that letter, it says they'll take you to (I think) North or Southampton County Court. I live up in Scotland, so in line with Prorugation of jurisdiction, they need to take me to court where I live. That makes it much more expensive for them to continue.

 

Also, and I realise this may not work for you if you live in England. On the contract it says all disputes will be dealt with under English law. If you don't live in England that infringes your statutory rights. Perhaps you do though so not so useful.

 

Assuming you don't live in the county where they're threatening to sue you, let them get on with it (it'll be an empty threat.) However if they do, you can write to the court and have it thrown out as being incompetent under P of J. (paragraph 3(4) of schedule 8 to the Civil Jurisdiction & Judgments Act 1982. Paragraph 3.)

 

They were on sticky ground with me anyway as I'd offered to settle in full in writing but they still denied me access to the club and refused to accept payment, they basically nullified their own contract.

 

That P of J law is handy as it may make it financially unviable for a company to chase you for money.

 

If you want any help you can get in touch, I still have my file at home.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply :)

 

My partner owes about £200.00 so they say.

 

I have received a letter from ARC saying i havent given them a good enough defence and will pass it onto Trevor Munn.

 

I have replyed saying basically that they obviously havent seen the paperwork i sent to Virgin in the beginning.

 

I originally sent Virgin a cheque in full and final settlement of my account and they banked it. They then wrote to me saying that he was in arrers and dont accept it and want the rest of the money. But really they should of sent the cheque back to me saying they dont accept it and then carried on and then take me to court.

 

Trevor Munn have also just written to me saying that they are preparing the paperwork, and explaining the cost i will be charged for going to court but have only just sent both letters yesterday so i will see what happens now!

 

I am getting help from my manger at work - but just worried if my partner goes to court and is in the wrong what would happen as he is unemployed as well so cant pay them anyway!

 

Thanks for any more help or advise given.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

ARC deliberately don't communicate with the gym, I tried explaining to them I'd offered in writing to make payment in full but the gym had declined, ARC still came after the money.

 

This is what will happen:

 

Trevor Munn will send that letter saying paper work is being prepared for court etc etc etc. (The is an empty threat. Also, they'll want to take you to court in North/Southampton, if you don't like there they can't. Prorugation of Jurisdiction dictates that they must lodge papers in a court local to you. Not that they will anyway.)

 

If you don't agree to pay what they're asking (which you absolutely shouldn't) You will then get a letter from a company called ScotCall threatening a visit from a door step collection representative. If this person exists at all, he/she has no legal powers. Only after it has gone to court is there any real legal power involved. (And remember, they're threatening action in a court that has no jurisdiction over you...)

 

On your partner not being able to pay. Even if it did go to court (and it absolutely won't for 200 quid) payment is based on ability to pay. The court will ask for income and outgoings then make a calculation on that.

 

But listen. Don't worry about it. Just keep all your paper work in any case. Don't have any communication that isn't in writing and don't talk to anyone on the doorstep, they have no power and are only there to intimidate you, if anyone turns up at all.

 

Now I make a sport of goading these people. Once you realise they have no power, you realise there isn't anything these cretins can do other than moan on the phone.

 

For me, the last I heard was from ScotCall threatening a doorstep collection. When I opened the letter, I laughed and stuck it my folder just in case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Guest Old_andrew2018

hi lee88f,

I saw the letter in the link and would argue that the ref no would identify you to Trevor Munn

Link to post
Share on other sites

That I do not mind about. I am not intimidated in the slightest about them. Like ive told them if they really think I owe money, I have told them to issue a claim form to the court and we can let a District Judge Decide if I owe Virgin any money and like I told them if I defend the claim and Win, I will plaster it all over the internet that I won! Because basically I believe I do not owe Virgin a Penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi guys, thanks for all the reassurance.

I too have been dealing with Virgin Active and have just now been passed on to Trevor Munn.

Are there any more follow ups on what happened to the alleged debt?

Edited by slick132
Defamatory remark removed - please see Site Rules about posting, thanks.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cairo and welcome to CAG

 

I have amended your post slightly to avoid defamatory language, which our site cannot carry. Please see our Site Rules about posting.

 

Also, please feel free to start your own thread here in the Gyms forum so you can discuss your case and seek advice if you want any.

 

You'll learn plenty by reading other threads here.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...