Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lots of debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all! first time poster and now a frazzled brain from trying find and read what I am looking for, excellent site btw!

 

Just like a lot of others on here I have struggled to meet the monthly minimum payments on my credit cards,

I have used the templates from this site to write to the Credit Card companies asking if they will accept a pro rata payment

(still waiting to hear back from them)

 

 

do I also need to write to them asking for a credit agreement?

I thought yes to enable me to check if the debt was enforceable or not as

 

 

the cards I have were obtained 12,11,8 and 7 years ago,

obviously new cards were activated but no credit agreement was issued with the replacement cards.

 

Reading some of the threads on here would I be correct in saying the first response from the cc companies will be informing me

to expect a default notice and if they will accept my payment offer or not?.

 

In laymen terms what can or can't I do if the agreements are not enforceable in respect of them not accepting my pro rata offer?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes still send the CCA requests. Depending on what they send back and whether they are legally enforceable will depend on what advice is given.

 

They have 12 working days from receipt of your request to provide the CCA, if they fail to do so or the agreement is unenforceable you can withold any future payments.

 

Send this recorded delivery http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter and enclose a £1 postal order.... do not sign the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your reply, does it have to be a £1 p.o? (will a cheque suffice?)

 

If unenforcebale you say I can withold future payments, is this until a compromise on reduced payments has been reached for me to clear the outstanding balance or leading to them writing off the debt?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If unenforcebale you say I can withold future payments, is this until a compromise on reduced payments has been reached for me to clear the outstanding balance or leading to them writing off the debt?

 

If they fail to send a CCA you can withold payment until they do. If they send an unenforceable agreement you can withold payment indefinitely, but if you wish you can negotiate repayment on your own terms if you feel morally obliged to repay any alleged debt. But remember, the words moral and finance together is something of a misnomer. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

One point to bear in mind is, that if you with hold payments they will frazzle your credit rating for a minimum of six years whether or not the debt is enforcable.

 

The CCA 1974 is not a magic wand that wishes debt away.

Beaten:

RBS: £4,500

AMEX: £4,200

Barclaycard Visa: £12,100

Barclaycard M/Card: £12,600

(Including the numerous DCAs they have set on me.)

PPI reclaims (into my bank account): £25,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies, I'm not wanting to make the debts vanish just to come to an agreement with them to enable me to repay an amount I can afford at present and for interest and charges to be frozen on the account to prevent the smaller repayments being eaten up making the debt bigger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have heard back from one of the CC companies confirming they have received my offer letter and to inform me a default notice will follow (actually arrived in seperate envelope at same time), having read the DN I'm guessing I have a standard DN asking me to correct the breach of contract within 17 days, if I don't they will terminate the agreement, may demand immediate repayment of monies due plus any interest and admin charges and they may also assign my account to a debt collection agency or take court action to recover the debt.?

I guess I now wait for the 17 days to pass for them to contact me again to enable a repayment plan to be sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have heard back from one of the CC companies confirming they have received my offer letter and to inform me a default notice will follow (actually arrived in seperate envelope at same time), having read the DN I'm guessing I have a standard DN asking me to correct the breach of contract within 17 days, if I don't they will terminate the agreement, may demand immediate repayment of monies due plus any interest and admin charges and they may also assign my account to a debt collection agency or take court action to recover the debt.?

I guess I now wait for the 17 days to pass for them to contact me again to enable a repayment plan to be sorted.

 

Issue a default before they will accept reduced payments?

Sounds like MINT or RBS to me. Correct?

Told you they would have to terminate the account before they could accept your plan did they?

 

Do post the DN up on here as it may be invalid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Attached is page 1 and 2 of the notice I received at the same time but in a seperate envelope from their letter thanking me for my financial statement, that letter reads..

Before your offer of payment is considered a DN will be issued, followed by a termination letter 21 days later, formally cancelling the facility, as you are unable to make payments in accordance with your t&c's.

Our debt recovery office will contact you shortly with regard o your repayment proposals and the suspension of interest charges.Please note interest will continue to be added to your account until payment proposals are accepted.

 

defnopage1.jpg

defnop2.jpg

Edited by Americanmuscle
Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, the DN is dated the 6th Feb which was a Saturday, so the letter could not have got into the postal system before Mon 8th, the legal system assumes that it was posted second class unless the creditor can prove differently. In that case you have to allow four days for postal service + 14 days for you to remedy the default, which brings it to the 26th Feb. They have stated you have 17 days from the date of the letter which would bring it to the 23rd, so you are three days short. The DN is defective on this count also it is defective because it should be date specific for the remedy date, saying 17 days from the date of the letter is incorrect. All you have to do now is for them to terminate the a/c & then they will have unlawfully rescinded the contract.

 

Do not let them know about the defective DN until they terminate the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's still defective because even if it was posted on the fri it could not get into the postal system before the following mon. Even tho' it was posted 1st class which is two days service it still makes the DN one day short + the fact that it's not date specific. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

With luck you'll get the hat trick, they'll send you a termination letter dated 22nd Feb & the CCA will turn out unenforceable too.

 

 

Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983, states that a failure of a Default Notice or Termination Notice to be accurate not only invalidates such notice (Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd V Swain & Co NLD 14 July 1998 but it is an unlawful rescission of contract which would not only prevent the court enforcing any alleged debt (Wilson V First County Trust Ltd [2003] UKHL 40, Wilson V Robertsons (London) Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1088, Wilson V Pawnbrokers [2005] EWCA Civ 147) - but would also give the claimant a claim for damages in the sum of £1000 (Kpophraror V Woolwich Building Society [1996] 4 All ER 119).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...