Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How Debt Collectors Trace You


jan7777
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5196 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

*_HOW DEBT COLLECTORS TRACE YOU_*

I recently moved home and was about to re-direct my mail thru royal mail.

I noticed a comment in the terms & conditions for re-direction that concerned me

 

 

I searched for more info on who Royal Mail informed of my new address and was amazed to learn that they share all members of my household’s details with a certain company whose name I cannot provide under the site rules.

 

It is a totally separate company to royal mail but directly linked to one of the largest credit reference agencies and they hold unbelievable amounts of info on everyone and actually offer tracing services amongst other data collection products which are available to anyone who purchases a license.

 

 

They say they sell only to companies but I registered quite easily with them in order to watch the videos they use to promote their products and they regularly email me offering new product info etc.

 

You wouldn’t believe how easy it is to use their software to trace people and every member of their household using their software.

 

Apparently British gas is responsible for 98% of their database records.

British Gas directly inform them of their customers whereabouts should they have a gas bill in their name and pass it to Royal Mail who provide every scrap of info linking a person from an old address to a new one.

 

Mail that isn’t even re-directed thru their re-direction service to an address provided confidentially by a customer is still reported to this company and easily accessed using their software!

 

In other words even if you only inform certain people i.e. your bank of your new address

and all your mail still goes to your previous address Royal Mail hold links to any and every letter to every address corresponding with yours and people in your household’s names. Including every variation of your name i.e.; initials, full name, Miss or Ms Etc.

 

Debt collecting agencies can freely access all this as long as they pay for the license and a few pennies per search.

 

This has got to be a breach of data protection laws in some way?

 

Anyone knows anything about this please reply?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

IMO (but it's not a legal one) the whole idea of Credit Reference agencies goes totally against any sort of DATA PROTECTION ACTS.

 

Not only do these agencies hold PERSONAL DATA about individuals - they can pass this on to 3rd parties and the checks they do when passing this data on are very superficial.

 

I'll bet if you call up one of these agencies and say you are "Joe Bloggs under the railway arches Ltd" and say I need to see if "Harry Flashman Neverpay" is good for credit you'll get a reply back too.

 

Also why is there NO transparency in any of this.

 

If you apply for credit and get turned down surely you should be given a proper reason -- Turned down bexause of xxxxxx etc etc.

 

I am doing WITHOUT credit these days -- much better way of living -- but these AWFUL companies still hold data about you WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

 

 

The Police and other organisations such as the Pensions service etc are allowed to hold data in performance of their DIRECT duties but these companies like Experian, Equifax etc should be SHUT DOWN FORTHWITH.

 

There's bound to be a rule that exempts these from various provisions from the Data protection acts -- sometimes I think ordinary Joe Public would have got a better deal if the old East German Stasi (State security secret police) ran this stuff. Bankers and Creditors get away with everything -- it's totally ONE SIDED. One law for them and NO law for us.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you move address and update things such as bank details, catalogues anything like that it shows on your credit file as a link to your previous address.

 

Only way you can get away from it is not have things such as a bank account for 3 years or more which you have to admit is near impossible.

 

DCA's then search your file see the link, know its you then thats when the letters start falling through your door.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Credit referencing agencies are often used because they are reliable. If you refuse to give your previous address when applying for credit it might look a bit suspicious/fraudulent.

 

If you want to run away from debts you would have to NEVER apply for credit for a few years, or give fraudulant information. But of course, these people can't resist getting a new phone contract...then the old debts resurface.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Credit referencing agencies are often used because they are reliable

 

I've nearly stopped laughing now! CRAs are as reliable as their sources which are anything but. I have a very common surname and have battles with CRAs on a regular basis, usually because DCAs attach defaults to my credit file for debts which are nothing to do with me. I've had two CCJs recorded against my name - though admittedly the CRA in question was a bit quicker to remove those once I started shouting. It's a good job I don't need a mortgage, I'd have to time it right to get one even though I don't owe anyone any money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...