Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Santander have sent their final response and have agreed that they were in the wrong. They will be refunding me the amount I am due and £50 for the delay.  Just the interest factor would be more than double the £50 that they are offering. Thinking to just close this and move on. Is this what you would do?  Opened a FOS case on the 1st of June but haven't heard back yet. 
    • It just been delivered and ive had a live chat with p2g to get some proof of deliverey and they send me a picture of the parcel placed in a gas meter box which they class as a ' 'Safe Place'  and not placed into the hands of the buyer which is either a good thing as the buyer can claim he never received It so i can claim against p2g or a bad thing . Do p2g have coordinators when taking pictures and scanning of parcels ?  I know Royal Mail do ... I'm going to send the buyer a message and see what he says
    • Eight in ten voters support blocking bonuses for polluting water firm bosses INEWS.CO.UK Polling for i exposes level of public anger over sewage dumping  
    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
    • If the purchaser denies having received it then sue P2G. If you simply don't hear anything more from the purchaser then you have the purchaser's name and address – and frankly for £48 I would go ahead and sue. As long as you have good proof of delivery then your chances of success are probably better than 95% and frankly the purchaser would probably put their hands up as they would effectively be being sued for the civil equivalent of theft. I wouldn't let it go if I were you. It would be a good exercise for you and gives you confidence the next time something comes up which is may be much more valuable
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letting agency charge me for references


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4850 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

G.Morning

I moving in to the new flat,letting agency Fry&Kent want charge me for a suplly references for my new landlord 25£+VAT,they right?I think they want take my money for nothing(is no information abaut this fee in tenacy agreement).Now agency put the property on a market lots of vivers come in I got idea to send on the end my tennacy to the letting agency bill 25£+VAT for every viev apoitment :cool: for thysome reason like they charge me for references...Any idea how sorted thys out?

Edited by robroy1974
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's standard practise for letting agents to charge for credit checks and obtaining references. I have just been down to an estate agents myself this morning, who are going to charge me £50 for credit check and references. The agency I'm with at the moment charged me £143 for the same thing, so I think £25 is really quite reasonable. Unfortunately, I can't advise on the situation with the property being on the market. Did the agents make you aware that the property was being let, but also going on the market?

 

Sorry I can't be more help. Perhaps someone with more knowledge than me will be along soon to advise. But as I said, £25 is much much cheaper than many other letting agencies charge. :)

Woozel 1 - DCA 0

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for quick response,I know 25£ it is not much money but I ready spend 300£ for fee in new letting agency and my old one charged me enought.So I think send bill to letting a. for every one vivers in my flat its a good idea for a reason I ready paid my rent and vievers is not including in my ageement.:) And why I shuld care abaut agency and potential new tenants.For real tenans have no rights for anything but lettings agents and landlords can expect from you what tey want....

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you paid £300 to the letting agency that found you this flat, that should have included the referencing fee - it normally does. You need to check what you signed with the agency.

 

It won't be shown on your tenancy agreement because that is a contract between you and the landlord (even though the agency may have signed it on his behalf).

 

You have no right to charge for viewings. HOWEVER, you do have a right to refuse viewings in the area that you rent (whole flat? room in flat?). If you google the phrase "quiet enjoyment" you'll get the idea.

 

What might work is to have a chat with the landlord (not agent) and see if he will get the agency to refund the reference fee in exchange for you allowing REASONABLE viewings.

 

If you do not know the landlords details - write to the agency for them, they have to provide them within 21 days under section 1 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for advice,this is 1bedroom house.I know many lettings agents charge for references I think this is no right,fee like this is moraly dodge...specialy when u pay expensive administration fee and u loyal costumer from few years...they will charge me 40£+VAT for check out on the end my tenancy...Money for nothing...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for advice,this is 1bedroom house.I know many lettings agents charge for references I think this is no right,fee like this is moraly dodge...specialy when u pay expensive administration fee and u loyal costumer from few years...they will charge me 40£+VAT for check out on the end my tenancy...Money for nothing...

 

I am no fan of letting agents...

 

However, they are not allowed to do a credit check themselves, they have to pay a licensed company to do it. That is why you have to pay.

 

£40 for check-out isn't reasonable - as in I don't think tenants should have to pay this - but again, they have to pay the staff the wages to do it. If you include the driving time etc it's probably a couple of hours work so £40 is probably right. (When I had an agent, he charged me (landlord) £70 for an inventory)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
I think it's standard practise for letting agents to charge for credit checks and obtaining references. I have just been down to an estate agents myself this morning, who are going to charge me £50 for credit check and references. The agency I'm with at the moment charged me £143 for the same thing, so I think £25 is really quite reasonable. Unfortunately, I can't advise on the situation with the property being on the market. Did the agents make you aware that the property was being let, but also going on the market?

 

Sorry I can't be more help. Perhaps someone with more knowledge than me will be along soon to advise. But as I said, £25 is much much cheaper than many other letting agencies charge. :)

 

The agent I am looking at want's to charge me £234! and then a months rent and a bond!. I am shocked!. WHY should we pay for a flat why not the landlord!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...