Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Next Directory Default Problems


gcbrit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5227 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I hope I'm posting this in the right section but apologies in advance if I haven't.

 

My other half & I went to Nationwide yesterday to apply for a mortgage and were declined due to a default against her from Next Directory, of which she was unaware of. Now this is where the fun begins...

 

Back in 2008 my OH was living in rented accommodation. She moved home and tried to notify Next Directory, over the phone, of her change of address but was told she would have to put it in writing as they couldn't change it over the phone. So she wrote to them confirming her new address and thought that was that. However, after not recieving any statements for a few months she decided to write to Next re-confirming her new address and to request her most recent statement.

 

After waiting a month and still no statement she wrote Next another letter, containing her new address (yet again), requesting her latest statement, a complaint about customer service and her wish to close the account after settling any outstanding balance. 2 to 3 weeks after sending this letter my OH recieved a letter from a debt collectors, at her new address :confused:, demanding payment of just under £80 on behalf of Next Directory. My OH replied immediately to the debt collectors enclosing full payment in good faith. She also sent a copy of this letter to Next Directory again requesting a statement to confirm that the amount claimed to be outstanding was correct and to also confirm the closing of her account.

 

To this day she has never recieved any response from Next to her requests for statements or complaints about customer service. She has never recieved any default notice in writing or other such communication from Next either. From the time of her moving home the only communication she has recieved that was related to Next Directory in any way was from the debt collectors. Funny how they could give the debt collectors her new address but they couldn't manage to put it onto any of her requested statements, don't you think? :rolleyes:

 

What we'd like your thoughts on are whether she has a valid justification for getting the default removed from her records? Also, are Next at fault for not changing her address despite the OH sending them 3 seperate letters stating her new address? Your thoughts and suggestions are greatly appreciated.

 

PS: She doesn't recall ever signing any credit agreement with Next Directory and she opened the account in the late 1990's, if that's of any significance? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sorry you were missed.

 

Defaults are notoriously difficult to remove but it can be done.

 

To begin with, I think you need to SAR Next:

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca

 

As well as what is on the request, you need to ask them for copies of all correspondence sent and received by them.

 

Read the template letter I have posted in the above link and edit it accordingly.

 

If Next didn't supply the DCA with your current address, they would have done a trace to find you. This could be how they found out where you live but it may be worth writing to them and asking what address Next gave them. If they refuse or give no response, you may have to SAR them too.

 

If you can prove that Next had your new address all along, this will go a long way in helping you get the default removed.

 

If all else fails, you can go to the Information Commissioner.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response silverfox.

 

I think we will have to send off SAR to Next & potentially the DCA too, as you've suggested. Another confusing issue relating to this whole business is that on the Nationwide credit chack system the default was registered under my OH new address. The address that Next seemed incapable of sending any statements or even the default notice to! :evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does the default say on her credit file?

 

Does it say 'satisfied'?

Who placed it on there Next or the DCA?

 

If it says anything other than 'satisfied' then you need to contact which ever company has placed the marker on there and tell them to remove it.

 

You should also contact the CRA's and advise them that the information on your credit file is incorrect and that they should adjust it to suit as necessary.

 

If the company who placed it on there is uneducated enough not to remove it, then, ONLY if YOU are WILLING to take them to court, can you sue them for damages, currently standing at £1000 per incorrect entry on your CRF.

BUT, you MUST follow it through to the end, else making a threat of legal action and failure to follow it through only damages other peoples attempts at getting this information removed and to seek damages.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice Bazooka.

 

On Nationwide's system it said 'Satisfied' but the default doesn't even show up on the OH CreditExpert report. We aren't 100% sure who's placed the default against her either but again on the Nationwide system it was listed under the address that Next weren't able to send any correspondence to. Very confusing?!

:confused:

 

I must admit we've already been thinking along the legal route if we don't get any joy from Next. The OH may even contact a solicitor anyway as she thinks she can get discounted rates through her employers.

Edited by gcbrit
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick update to let you know that Next have agreed to remove the default from my OH credit file. :D

 

Well that turned out to be a lot easier than I expected. But I guess I shouldn't get too carried away untill we've recieved actual confirmation.

 

Thanks to everyone for your comments & help! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...