Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If it's Statute Barred and haven't made any payments towards it then send them a letter from the Library.
    • Hi 👋  I've received an out of the blue letter from Intrum saying they've passed a historic debt to Resolvecall who will be visiting our property if we don't get in touch.  I am certain this is statute barred and designed to scare us.  Do we ignore it?
    • 1) You can call them judge 2) I would say something to the line of "The Claimant needs to prove I was driving. I don't accept or deny being driving." 3) Yes I will see if I can find out for you now  
    • Hi All, I've just had the inevitable N24 and other paperwork arrive. I've read other examples on here and I think I understand the steps to follow. I have until the 28th May to return the N180 Small Claims Direction Questionnaire, I also have an N244 Application notice copy. I read an update on a case you kindly put a link in for me to read. Turns out they lost in court and are now struggling. I really don't want to get to that stage and am thinking mediation may be the way forward? Thoughts please? Pretty sure I've missed the 7 days to have the order set aside.  For reference, this is what I received: Dated 8th May Before Deputy District Judge Baker sitting at the Civil National Business Centre, 4th Floor St Katharine's House, 21-27 St Katharine's Street, Northampton, NN1 2LH   The Court will deal with the application to lift the stay without hearing under CPR 23.8(c)   It is ordered that:   The Application to lift the stay and for direction questionnaires to be issued is granted.   Because this Order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the Order set aside, varied or stayed. A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this Order. If the application is one which requires a hearing, and   a) the party making the application is the Defendant; and b) the Defendant is an individual,   then upon the filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the Defendant's home court. In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Carter claimform - old Egg Loan 'debt' - stayed


BonM
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4536 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you want to, write and simply remind him of the CPR requirement. However, asking once is enough - he knows the law (well, he should!).

 

You now have a defence in, so if he discontinues, you claim costs and he would find it very hard to issue another claim on the same facts, or lack thereof.

 

Carter generally avoids fast track.

 

Edit: Beat me to it, shadow. Next stage is, if he coughs up, AQs - you can ask for an order that Carter complies with your CPR request. An alternative now is to go straight for strike out for non-compliance, but that would cost money via an N244, and with the AQ can do it for you free and, if he fails to comply, you can still hammer for costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

He knows the law, but clearly ignores it, strange really!

 

Forgive me, but, can you explain what an AQ is exactly? sorry, but I am unfamiliar with the legal terms.

Edited by BonM
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all, First post but i have already got so much help and information from you guys so many thanks.

 

I have an ongoing issue with BC much the same as the OP's, and have so far followed everything to the letter already advised in this thread.

BC's time for my CPR request expired yesterday, and as i have yet to recieve anything from him would it be good practice to wait a further couple of days due to Bank Holiday post etc before submitting my defence.

Also can my defence using the template earlier in this thread (thankyou) be submitted online to Northampton CC in the same way as my Acknowledgment of Service form, which was recieved by the court 24/03/10.

 

Many Thanks for your advice

Pugz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

OK, so I received the details from Bryan Carter today, I have uploaded the attachments to show what I have been sent, can someone please check this for me to see if it is enforceable, I think it is, if so, then fair enough and many thanks for everybody's help thus far.

 

BonM

 

OK Re attached as PDF, hopefully this is better for everyone. Thanks

 

BonM

Egg_Agreements.pdf

Edited by BonM
incorrect upload of docs
Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at what they have sent....is your signature on the same page as the prescribed terms, and are those terms all there?

Here are the prescribed terms.

 

1. Number of repayments;

2. Amount of repayments;

3. Frequency and timing of repayments;

4. Dates of repayments;

5. The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable

 

 

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well to be honest, I really am a novice at this. So in taking what creditcardmug has said, the answer is, no my signature is not on the same page as the prescribed terms. The prescribed terms as creditcardmug has stated 1 - 5 appear on a different page. But does this make it unenforceable, I do not want to assume anything, but that is why I haved asked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if your sig is not on the same page, then does the page with your sig say that the terms are "overleaf" or elsewhere.

If not then unenforceable, on that point, there may be others

 

The "prescribed terms must be found within the four corners of the agreement, they cannot be found elsewhere"

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read and re read this page upon which my signature shows. It does not state at any point on the same page the terms, neither does it state the terms are overleaf, and niether does it state the terms can be found anywhere else. I have uploaded a copy of both pages as show in post #56 this is all I have received and is why I am asking for it to be checked for confirmation if it is enforceable or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok fine so its not enforceable, can you just post up your defence, and say whether you ever had a Default Notice?, i dont have too much time left, but can see you are still online

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not recall ever having received a default notice. I am unaware of what defence stance I should take on this, I originally posted an embarassed defence, and this is the only documentation I had received from my CPR request. Thank you for your help creditcardmug, I really do appreciate it. Any further help from anyone in regard to if this is 100% non enforceable, and how or which stance I should take would be greatly appreciated.

Edited by BonM
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked back through the thread, cant find your defence word for word, going by the posts it looks like the claim is "stayed" at Northampton, so phone the court tomorrow to check on this, then consider an application on form N244 to have the claim struck out.

 

In any event do not contact carter again

 

just to help you with what happens next, if carter begins to move again, you will get a letter from the court to say it has been moved to your local county court, and also a form called an Allocation Questionnaire, dont be afraid of it, this is where you can do the most damage to the other side, if done correctly.

 

i hope tp be able to help you further, but if not, there are many more on here who can

  • Haha 1

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, the letter from the court after I submitted my defence, the bottom part reads

 

"Where he (BC) wishes to proceed, the claimant must contact the court within 28 days after receiving a copy of your defence. After that period has elapsed, the claim will be stayed. The only action the claimant can then take will be to apply to a judge for an order lifting the stay"

 

So as of now, this is the 24th working day from the date of the letter from the court which was 3rd March, not including weekends or bank holiday days. I will contact the court tomorrow and see what they say, I believe the next course of action suggested N244 is costly...(not sure how much though?) or how to go about doing this I will try to look it up. Thank you so far again everyone, and any further help or advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok I have done some research and please correct me if I am wrong, but the N244 is a form I fill in to have the judgement stayed. I need to file reasons for this etc, I have had a look around and can not find where a template/help on this for filling out this form is. Can anybody point me in the right direction for help with filling out the N244 and to what I should be putting in it i.e legal terms etc? Many thanks

 

BonM

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, the N244 would be an application to have the case thrown out as it does not have a realistic chance of success and/or the claimant has breached certain rules (which, knowing BC they will have)

 

Search for strike out and see what you can come up with, otherwise I'll post some links tomorrow

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, so is the N244 the form I should be using? I am a little confused between this and the AQ. I have alos read that there is an N1 form I would need to fill in also.

 

My previous defence is posted below word for word.

 

DEFENCE

 

"1. The Particulars of Claim issued by the Claimant, discloses no cause of action and are self evidently an abuse of process, in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR.

 

2. Bryan Carter & Co Solicitors have failed to respond to CPR 31.14 letter dated 12th February 2010, requiring disclosure of the documents that the Claimant seeks to rely on in court.

 

3. Further to that above the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed."

 

 

I can find nothing on strike out, it seems it is not easy to find things on here unless you know exactly where you are looking, I have tried but could not and would really appreciate being pointed in the right direction as long as we are all agreed the information I have been sent is unenforceable in form of CPR request post #56 is where it is uploaded. Advice would be great from here gh or anyone Thank you all again so much!

 

BonM

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK So I have the N244 form and I am assuming I would input the following into question 3. Question 3 reads "What order are you asking the court to make and why?"

So I would input the following.

"I am asking the court to strike out this case based on the fact that Bryan Carter and EGG have failed to comply with the full CPR requests, also, upon receiving what they prescribe to be my liability to the debt entailed, I believe this to be not correct and not enforceable as the terms do not appear within the agreement and I believe this will not have a realistic chance of success"

If someone could please advise me on this, would be greatly appreciated, as I do not know if this is the kid of thing they are looking for and if maybe I need to use any certain terminology etc. I can not get through to the court at the moment as their phone lines keep saying they are closed but will keep trying in order to find out if this has been stayed or not, though I doubt it has yet, as today is the 25th day of 28.

Thanks

BonM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally got through to the court, case has been stayed, they have informed me i need not do anything else. After 4 months, if the case has not been taken further, it will be struck out. They have advised me to not do anything and just sit and wait BC next move!

 

Thank you to all of you so far for all of your help, you are wonderful and I could not have done this without you so far. Godmother, Vint, Donkey, creditcardmug twofoot and the rest of you, thank you all so much for your support and advice and direction. If I hear anything further and am unusure how I need to progress I will ask.

 

Many thanks

 

BonM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok what date did the stay take effect?

 

I would make a call to the courts to find this out so u can make a call to the courts every 2 weeks/months on the correct date to say what is going on?

 

Also on yourcalendar make a note and then give the courts a call to find out what is going on.

  • Haha 1

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The case was stayed on the 6th April, I can call them every 2 weeks not a problem. One Issue I have is that Egg sent me a statement through showing payments I had made at random points, like I had said in the beginning of the thread as and when I could afford it etc. Would this effect anything if this goes to court? Also, just to make 100% sure that the agreement I had posted in post #56 is non enforceable could I get some other opinions too just so I can be 100% confident, would be greatly appreciated, thank you so much. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone, thought I would just post this up here and catch any new eyes that have not seen my existing thread where my Loan Agreement is also posted. Can you please give me your opinion to see if this is enforceable. This is on two seperate pages and is what I had received from Bryan Carter in response to my CPR request. I received nothing else from the.

 

Thanks for your continued help and support, and here is the link to my existing thread.

 

BonM

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/244010-bryan-carter-litigation-proceedings.html

Egg_Agreements[1].pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...