Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car in garage for over 2 months


Nutgrove
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, My 2001 BMW went into an independent garage in mid-November for a service, MOT, and new front brake discs (because there was slight vibration under breaking on the motorway). After they finished the service and disc change, it failed the MOT on brake imbalance. They replaced the brake calipers, but no difference, and after trying a replacement ABS unit in the car they sent the original off for testing which came back as 'ok'. They exchanged a 'boost pump' and also the master cylinder. They replaced the brake calipers again just in case they were a duff set, but still no improvement. There is now another problem in that the ABS light comes on after reaching about 20mph, and they can find a problem. They took it to the BMW main dealer who suggested exchanging the ABS unit again, but the garage decided this was not necessary as this had been done already. They are still working hard trying to solve the problem, but I am beginning to feel that a brake problem really shouldn't take this long to solve. I'm not really sure what to do! I can't really take it off them as they know what's been changed and another garage may have to start again. I wish it could go back to how it was before it went, but the abs light must be related to something which has happened in the last two months. Does anyone have any suggestions please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you say slight vibration under braking, did you feel it through the car or the steering wheel? have they checked the brake hose pipes, it might be worth replacing them, and have they inspected the rear brakes for any possible faults.

 

2 months is ridiculous to fix this, i would really consider taking the car somewhere else and have them look at it, they have actually added to your predicament by causing a fault with the abs, i'd hate to think how much this is costing you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - thanks for the reply. The vibration under braking was through the steering - it was classic warped discs vibration. They have replaced all the flexi hoses and also the rear discs and pads too. The problem is that I won't want to pay anything to the current garage without the car being fixed, and as there is the new problem with the abs, is this something caused by what they have done or not? It's hard to say, although they have had the whole braking system to pieces etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a classic case of not following correct procedure in bleeding the braking system, especially more so since changing the ABS modulator. You can't do it properley without having it hooked up and electronically opening the valves in a set sequence. It's nothing like it used to be in the good old days.

 

Once this has been done road test. The swop wheels front to back and balance. Road test again and it still evident then start measuring run out and wear pattern on surface of discs under a magnifying glass.

 

A pad change could be in order as well as it's not unknown for varience in compressibility of the linings predominantly on metal sintered pads.

 

I also take it that routine things like steering and suspension joints are ok as are the run out on the wheels and tyres.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there is vibration now, but as I haven't had it back I don't know how it drives now. Brake balance has been measured on the MOT rolling road, and the system is being bled electronically as they are a proper Bosch service centre. The problem is the ABS/DSC light coming on and there not being a found cause for this. There is a £600 new Bosch ABS valve block on it's way from Germany now, so if this doesn't solve the issue, do I have to pay for it? It is a Bosch system in the hands of a Bosch service centre - I can't understand how it can be unsolvable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of these issues is insolvable and provided the correct process is followed there should be none.

 

However, the fact that ABS light and now DSC light come on is significant.

 

The first thing to check, which is not in the manuals, is to check the wheel diameter at the tyres.

 

I've posted it before but all 4 wheels have to be within a certain percentage of each other, otherwise it will trigger all systems associated with the ABS.

 

Now as you have a DSC light on as well this makes it a bit more complicated.

 

The DSC relies on a little black box mounted centrally in the car. The inertia of a skid is determined by the G force generated in unit and sends a signal to ABS unit.

 

These are just some thoughts with regards to progressing the problem but I can catagoricaly say it's not easy to trace these issues as they don't have access to what is known as live data.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Nothing's really changed with the wheels though. The rear tyres are newer than the fronts, but they were replaced over 6 months ago, and all are the same size.

I'm not sure what you mean by live data - is it driving with a laptop connected to the ECU so you can see what's going on? They have a fair amount of laptops and software but I'm not sure if they have the same degree as a BMW main dealer. I'll wait and see if this new unit solves the problem, and then will have some difficult issues to confront. If the problem is fixed, how many of the new parts fitted will I have to pay for? If it is not fixed, can I take the car away and pay nothing? If the answer to the second question is 'yes', are the garage responsible for getting the car repaired elsewhere?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will have to pay the garage for the new parts fitted if everything gets resolved , it will also depend on what you agreed with the garage when you asked them to look at it.

if none of it has been resolved you will still have to pay for all parts they have fitted and take it to another garage to fix, they would be within their rights to keep your car until they get payment, if you pay , write clearly on the invoice "paid under protest", not just yours but also their copy too. this will be a record that you were unhappy with garage.

 

did they not inform you and ask you for your Authorization when replacing these parts ?

test drive the car before payment, as you state you are still unsure that the vibration is still there, have they informed you what parts that they replaced cured this?

As for the matter regarding the abs/dsc you might have some redress there about paying, because it seems this problem manifested when they were trying to cure the other problem , i would argue your case on this, and another thing you should ask for either way , is for all the old parts back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks MegaCraggy. There was nothing wrong with the car when it went in to the garage. It was for a service, MOT, and front disc replacement which was part of the service - these are consumable items these days I believe? I would be more than happy to get the car back exactly as it went in! If only I could turn back time.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you ask them to clear down the chassis system control module, test to get lights on again and let you know the fault codes that are being registered. Then post them here or let us know and I'll have a look. Remember the codes just because registered does not mean that part is faulty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't remember exactly but the speedo sensor on beemers is on the diff I think which is another signal the DSC picks up on. ABS uses the wheel speed sensors.

 

I wonder if they have jacked up the car on one end and the yaw sensor has got stuck????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need the code nutgrove. It will usually start with a letter followed by 4 numbers and for the code above there will have to be others as well so if you could get all codes it would help. It's also possible to be a 2 digit code but think this would be unlikely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry for the delay, and I don't have the actual code. It is to do with the pressure from the charge pump when the self test runs at 20 mph. The pressure is low, and so the lights all come up on the dash - ABS, DSC, and also the '!' warning triangle. The garage have reached the end of their time with it as it is now 3 months, and although they are not charging for the 100 or so hours labour, I have a bill for about £3000 for parts which they have fitted which have not solved the problem. The list of parts is extensive, and would be a large bill even if it was fixed. A broken car and £3000 out of pocket is not good, especially as it would only be worth about £4500 in perfect working order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll see what I can do with this. Can you ask them how they know the pressurre was low? Are they relying on the electronics or did they have an actual pressure reading?

 

It still suggests to me a Bleeding of fluid problem believe it or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your help. They have replaced the pressure sensor twice in the abs valve block, but are getting error 5C which is low charge pump pressure or pressure 'out of acceptable parameters' I think. They have bled the system many times now and used gallons of brake fluid and they have done this using the computer (opening the nipples and pressing a button on the computer I believe).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I just went to the garage for all the codes, and this is a print out from one program which was done by someone they called in:

 

5C DSC: Pressure-sensor test

DSC actively switched

no ABS control

Stop-light switch: not actuated

no ASC control

no DSC contol

Brake booster: passive

no ACC control

no HDC control

 

 

The Win Star machine which is owned by the garage came up with these errors:

88 - Pre-charge pump

92 - Brake pressure sensor plausibility

 

If anyone has any further ideas I'd be most grateful!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nuts,

 

Sorry for the pun as I expect it is driving you so.

 

I have come across this before and it is extreamly rare but can happen. I'm not able to tell you where but is fixable if it is what I think and the history of the repair will sort of verify it.

 

If youd be kind enough to pm me with a breakdown/precis of what happened and the history of the garage diagnosis I'll run it by my guys to confirm or discuss what is the likely cause and suggest a way of getting over it. I could also do with knowing if the pedal feels hard or sinks i.e. irrespective of the lights, does the pedal feel normal. A way of doing this and gauging the degree of degredation is, if possible, to pump the pedal some 20 times, then run the engine for a few minutes. Turn off and repeat the pumping. Pedal should go hard after about 6 to 10 pumps. This exhausts the servo assistance and gives a real life condition of the hydraulic system.

 

To be fair, if it is what I think it is then it's highly unlikely they will have come across it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

It went to a BMW specialist who managed to diagnose a faulty master cylinder and fix it within 2 days. I have been presented with a bill for £2500 (which includes the service and the disc and pad change - originally quoted at £1200). The question really is if this is fair to charge the extra £1300 especially as it has taken over 3 months. The charge pump is what was causing the problem originally, so I obviously don't mind paying for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...