Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Drydens "NOTICE OF INTENDED CIVIL RECOVERY"


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5247 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Elizabeth,

You should write and say that the value that they are asking for is disproportionate to the offence. If they took it that seriously then they would have involved the police. Asking for such a ludicrous amount is unethical and immoral in my opinion. It all depends really if you did mean to take the item or if, like me it was unintentional. Whatever happens, £100 is way too high a price to pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My situation is that a moment of madness took over me, a week ago in m&s ... i decided to skip the queue and put a cookie in my bag, it seems stupid right now and yes i regret it but its done so there we go .....but 55p!!and then less than a 5 minute talk which seemed so laid back at the time and now £100 !! it seems so unreasonable but i just dont think my letter will make any difference , do you think i should contact the store?? i have less than 5 days to do anything ..what should i do? but thank you very much for your replies ..oh and yes iv read the CAB report its helped but not enough to make me feel confident about writing to them

Edited by elizabeth.t
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Elizabeth

 

The family business in which I work is retail so I can see the situation from the other side, but I am on your side. You have already admitted it was wrong, and have learned from it. It is time to move on and stop beating yourself up. Look on the bright side; at least the cookie didn't find its way onto your hips!

 

From here on out it should be business. M&S chose not to take criminal proceedings and they did that for business reasons, not out of any compassion for you as such.

 

This business of civil recovery is all about two things, making money out of you and setting an example, and you should have no compunction in my view about avoiding that from happening, simply because it is a business matter and not criminal.

 

Whatever other CAGers suggest to you to get out of it as much as possible you should consider and follow if it seems like a good idea.

 

Any restitution you may want to make can be done after the event and could for example be a donation to charity (Find out what M&S gives to) or something like that if you feel you need to "re-pay". Or you could volunteer to help others as others on here are enriching their lives by helping you.

 

I hope other CAGers do not interpret my post as an endorsement of crime. This is trying to be about forgiveness and positive restitution. (Hope this lot doesn't sound too pompous!)

 

Anyway, good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thursday, 14 January 2010 Specialist debt litigation law firm Drydens has acquired commercial recovery specialists LCL Collections Limited and merged the business and its workforce into the Drydens practice. This brings the number of staff employed by the niche, top ranking firm to 165.

The move will provide a significant boost to Drydens’ commercial debt recovery offering and signals its intention to become a key player in the sector. Drydens already has a significant presence in the consumer finance recoveries market and the acquisition of LCL will provide instant strength in depth in the commercial area.

 

Drydens’ Executive Chairman Philip Holden explained, “Drydens has a small team servicing the commercial recoveries market and we identified this as an area with considerable growth potential. We already know the LCL team, their client base and their operating system which is the same as our own. There are a lot of synergies between our two businesses and it makes sound commercial sense to put the two together to create a sizeable business from which to grow. We believe our combined strengths will make a market leading proposition in this very competitive sector.”

 

Tim Pope, an Insolvency Practitioner and insolvency lawyer with LCL has transferred his insolvency law practice to Drydens taking on the post of Director of Legal (Insolvency). He will be responsible for developing an insolvency offering to support the firm’s client base.

 

LCL director Gerard Barron will become Director of Commercial Business with fellow LCL director Andrew Langton taking on the post of Head of Commercial Business.

 

“Being part of a larger organisation will bring lots more benefits and opportunities for our clients and staff and I am delighted with the move,” says Gerard. “There are many exciting development opportunities on the horizon for us and the new structure will enable us to seize these and build a business which delivers the best debt litigation solutions for its clients.”

 

(Source - Drydens News Release)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...