Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fighting A Charging Order MBNA/RESTONS after Redetermination


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK Patrick, thank you, will do but....just wondering........

 

I spent today looking at the papers MBNA sent, my SAR request specifically asked for many things, well everything going back to the time the account was first opened which was 1995.

Just want to vent some frustration now........

as well as no agreement......

the only things they sent me are

1. the COMMS LOG going back to 2003

2. the statements going back to 2003.

3. a few letters telling him how they understand he is having difficulties etc dated May 2009

 

THAT IS IT!!!! They didnt send anything else :

NO DEFAULT NOTICE

NO TERMINATION NOTICE

NOTHING!!!!

I was expecting it to go back to 1995........

 

Is it worth me writing back to them asking them to comply with my request and send me everything within say 7 days? Then go for the set aside?

Should I at least give them a chance to respond back otherwise they can turn around and say I didnt give them time.

The SAR stuff came 3 days before the 40 day deadline.

I am so annoyed now, so much missing it's unbelievable. How could we ever be expected to audit the account if this is what they do. Also dont forget I did ask them for the charges info before and they faffed about with that back in October and didnt send me anything until January and even that only went back to 2006!!! :x:x

 

This will all stand me in good stead if and when they start the same ball rolling with my credit card debt!

 

Cheers

 

This is why you need to go for the ,set a side, let me be clear without the docs they would not have got very far if you had defened.

icon6.gif

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 315
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ok a little note.

 

Restriction

 

 

The restriction which can be entered on the register where a charging order is made against one of joint proprietors is in the following form :-

No disposition of the registered estate is to be registered without a certificate signed by the applicant for registration or his conveyancer that written notice of the disposition was given to [name of person with the benefit of the charging order] at [address for service], being the person with the benefit of [an interim] [a final] charging order on the beneficial interest of (name of judgment debtor) made by the (name of court) on (date) (Court reference.…).

 

 

 

You are therefore correct in saying that when the Land Registry receives an application to register, for example a transfer, we will not ask to see the consent of the person who has the benefit of the charging order. We will only want a certificate from the applicant for registration or his conveyancer that the person who has the benefit of the charging order has been given written notice of the transfer.

 

If both joint owners sell the land to a third party the restriction will be cancelled when the transfer to the purchasers is

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok a little note.

 

Restriction

 

 

The restriction which can be entered on the register where a charging order is made against one of joint proprietors is in the following form :-

No disposition of the registered estate is to be registered without a certificate signed by the applicant for registration or his conveyancer that written notice of the disposition was given to [name of person with the benefit of the charging order] at [address for service], being the person with the benefit of [an interim] [a final] charging order on the beneficial interest of (name of judgment debtor) made by the (name of court) on (date) (Court reference.…).

 

 

 

You are therefore correct in saying that when the Land Registry receives an application to register, for example a transfer, we will not ask to see the consent of the person who has the benefit of the charging order. We will only want a certificate from the applicant for registration or his conveyancer that the person who has the benefit of the charging order has been given written notice of the transfer.

 

If both joint owners sell the land to a third party the restriction will be cancelled when the transfer to the purchasers is

 

So sorry Lilly, please can you explain this, I have read it 3 times but just dont get it, I think I need a break away for a bit, been reading and making notes all day!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think simplistically it means........

 

If you decide to sell, your solicitor is only obliged to inform the land registry / creditor of the sale 14 days before completion. This does not give the creditor time to apply for his chunk. House is sold, CO automatically drops off at the point of sale. You've got all the proceeds, claimant gets nothing - it's too late.

 

This only applies if the house is joint, but the debt is in one name.

 

Even though it may be a final CO, it only carries the "weight" of a restriction

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think simplistically it means........

 

If you decide to sell, your solicitor is only obliged to inform the land registry / creditor of the sale 14 days before completion. This does not give the creditor time to apply for his chunk. House is sold, CO automatically drops off at the point of sale. You've got all the proceeds, claimant gets nothing - it's too late.

 

This only applies if the house is joint, but the debt is in one name.

 

Even though it may be a final CO, it only carries the "weight" of a restriction

 

Oh I see! Many thanks hatesdebt!

We still havent heard of a court date yet for the final CO hearing..........the interim order was awarded on the 4th March.......anyone know how soon we will hear of a new date for the hearing.....or does it depend on how busy they are?

 

Also, going back to my letter to the Land Registry above, should I add about the missing documents etc or leave that out?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think simplistically it means........

 

If you decide to sell, your solicitor is only obliged to inform the land registry / creditor of the sale 14 days before completion. This does not give the creditor time to apply for his chunk. House is sold, CO automatically drops off at the point of sale. You've got all the proceeds, claimant gets nothing - it's too late.

 

This only applies if the house is joint, but the debt is in one name.

 

Even though it may be a final CO, it only carries the "weight" of a restriction

 

Would you part with your money if there was a caution placed on a property your were buying

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL

 

Right, first thing's first, I need to get this letter off to the Land Registry tomorrow, this is what I have written, havent gone into more details because they just wanted to know if I object and the grounds I have :

does this sound ok, is there anything that I shouldnt put or anything I should add (like the missing agreement and lots of other stuff missing that has prevented us from auditing the account?)

 

Many thanks,

 

Dear Land Registry,

 

Title Number : xxxxxxx

Property Affected : xxxxxx

 

I am writing to confirm that I object to the application to register a restriction against the above property.

 

My reasons are as follows:

 

1. I object to a CO being placed in that I have a beneficial interest in that I jointly own this property.

 

2. When this house was purchased I paid the deposit and have been maintaining the mortgage payments.

 

3. We have a payment arrangement in place with our other creditors, which MBNA refused to be part of and this would be upset by an order being made.

 

4. Our other creditors who have accepted pro-rata payments and have reduced or frozen the interest would be unduly prejudiced.

 

5.Our mortgage is a joint mortgage but this debt is only in one name and I do not wish to be penalised for X's debt.

 

6.Do I say here about not being able to audit the account as MBNA have failed twice now to send me the info I require? (missing agreement, list of unfair charges going back to the time the account was opened) ?

 

anything else I need to add? This is going to the Land Registry only I think, I have emotional reasons too but does the Land Registry need to hear that or is something I save for later?

 

Many thanks again for your time

 

Me again, :)

Morning all ,

Iwould like to get the above letter off to the Land Registry today if poss,

pls can anyone advise me if I can add number 6 above or leave it out? (seeing as this is my objection about the CO and the SAR was his request for his account.....even though I did all the work LOL)

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK guys and girls,

 

I'm writing the response letter to my incomplete SAR, it's all done but I have a question....

you now they said that they can't provide a copy of the original signed agreement.......do I need to make a reference to that at all in this letter?

And if so, what do I say exactly? I'm asking because I am highlighting all the missing info and the agreement is missing but they have said they cant provide it so do I need to make a reference to it in this letter at all?

 

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Northstar,

 

I read this entire thread last night as I'm in a similar situation to you [OH is sole debtor - house is jointly owned] but we've already got to the final CO stage - it's a major worry so I really sympathise with you going through it yourself. I wanted to let you know that I understand what you're going through/been through I wanted to bump this thread as things seem to have gone a little quite.

 

I would say that I'd be inclined to say nothing about the missing CCA - as from what I've read on various threads on this forum, it seems failure to provide it means you have a better case, although I think that applies moreso at a much earlier stage of proceedings that where you [and me] are currently at. The lack of a CCA would have had some clout if you'd had it right at the start, as a means of defence. That's my understanding anyway, someone can correct me if I'm wrong.

 

Looking forward to your update on all of this and seriously hoping that you get a better result than we did :smile:

 

OK guys and girls,

 

I'm writing the response letter to my incomplete SAR, it's all done but I have a question....

you now they said that they can't provide a copy of the original signed agreement.......do I need to make a reference to that at all in this letter?

And if so, what do I say exactly? I'm asking because I am highlighting all the missing info and the agreement is missing but they have said they cant provide it so do I need to make a reference to it in this letter at all?

 

Many thanks!

"Someday a real rain will come and wash all this **** off the streets" - Travis Bickle

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Stardeed,

 

Many thanks for writing and your support. Yep, all gone a bit quiet now as I sent MBNA/Restons the letter back telling them what was missing (didnt mention the CCA as they admitted already they didnt have it LOL)

so I focussed on the missing default, missing termination, missing all sorts of other stuff.

Their deadline is in a few days so I will post back here when they respond as I will need some advice on what to do next. In the meantime the Land Registry have received my objections to the CO and they said they have passed it onto Restons.....so it's a waiting game now!

 

So sorry to hear you had to go through the same. It makes this all the more harder when you get into this problem through no fault of your own, which has happened to us. But, I am a fighter so will keep going until someone actually restrains me and says ENOUGH, YOU CANT DO ANYMORE! :D

MBNA and Restons thought they could bully my old man.....but they didnt know he had a wife with a big mouth and one who will fight to defend her rights! ;)

Have a lovely weekend. Many thanks again

 

I will be back everyone.....just waiting to see what comes in the post now. The ball is in their court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Everyone!

 

Hope you all had a good Easter.

Well, Im back and here is the update:

 

MBNA/Restons have ignored my reply to their incomplete SAR so I am now looking into making a complaint with the ICO......anything else I should be doing?

 

We still havent heard of the final court hearing court date. I know they go the interim CO on the 4th March.

 

The Land Registry received my objections to the CO 2 weeks ago now and said that they have passed it onto Restons so I need to wait to hear from them.

 

Feel a bit in limbo now, I will work on the complaint to the ICO this week....then I guess it's a waiting game?

 

Cheers!

 

Also forgot to say : when do I actually go for the set aside as discussed in my earlier posts, should I wait to see what the ICO do?

Edited by Northstar68
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone!

 

Hope you all had a good Easter.

Well, Im back and here is the update:

 

MBNA/Restons have ignored my reply to their incomplete SAR so I am now looking into making a complaint with the ICO......anything else I should be doing?

 

We still havent heard of the final court hearing court date. I know they go the interim CO on the 4th March.

 

The Land Registry received my objections to the CO 2 weeks ago now and said that they have passed it onto Restons so I need to wait to hear from them.

 

Feel a bit in limbo now, I will work on the complaint to the ICO this week....then I guess it's a waiting game?

 

Cheers!

 

Also forgot to say : when do I actually go for the set aside as discussed in my earlier posts, should I wait to see what the ICO do?

 

yes write to them that unless they produce what you want within 7 days you will make an application to the court (but don't make the threat unless you intend to carry it out)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx diddidikcy,

 

I have been through all this though, 3 times they have ignored my requests for all the info so now the letter to the ICO is going tomorrow detailing all the missing info.

Should I wait to hear back from them or start the ball rolling for the set aside?

 

I will fight on and am prepared to take the next step necessary to get MBNA/RESTONS off our backs legally.

Just want to be sure I am doing things in the right order.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have refused to comply with the SAR and you have the proof of delivery of the request then i would make an application to the court to order them to produce the information. and that no further proceedings take place until you have been provided with the information

 

this would have the effect (IMO) of giving grounds to delay any hearings until that information is provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well here we go! We have a final charging order hearing date!

 

Now it's here I feel sick,.......but from what everyone has said here we have a good chance to get them legally off our backs.......

The hearing will be in about 6 weeks........

 

The letter of complaint to the ICO will go special delivery Monday.

 

Now, with this timescale, I know I need to get my objections written down to send to the court the week before.........

 

This set aside thing......do I start the ball rolling now? How? (I will read through my thread again of course!)

 

I'm all over the place now, not sure what I should be doing first, slight panic mode as the letter just arrived today.....so I need to calm down and fast, I know I can do this, with your help of course, please can you just tell me the order of events now, what I should do first and by when.......

 

I have about 5 weeks to prepare, 6 weeks to the hearing.

Huge thanks as always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK me again,

I have read through loads of things here, got lost on the way.

 

Thinking aloud :

 

1. letter to the ICO going Monday special Delivery

2. in the next week or so I will sort out my objections.

3. go for the set aside.......wahaaaaay

 

so for number 3, how do I go about that please? I have opened up so many links and boxes here that I'm lost now and suffering info overload, if anyone could advise me on how I begin the set aside process I would be so grateful.

Thanks so much as always.

Drinks on me ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for writing lilly white.

 

I am DEFINATELY continuing the fight and won't stop until one of you good people here says to me 'enough, you have done all you can' or the Judge rules in our favour (big chance we may have the same judge), not sure if that's good or not seeing as he ruled forthwith last time!

 

All I need is the push behind me that I have enough to have this business set aside then I will go for it. MBNA AND RESTONS have been downright, nasty, bullying, used delaying tactics to stop me auditing my husband's account and much much more, plus the rubbish advice the CCCS gave us.....I've got so much I'm unhappy about as you have all read above.

 

So bring it on I say!

 

I will be studying the link later tonight and start again with it tomorrow.

Thank you so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...