Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds Loan - Default Notice & Solicitors Letter


JRP1414
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5266 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am after some help with my other half's personal loan from Lloyds TSB if I can please? We have come across a problem with it and are now struggling to work out the next step.

 

The loan is a few years old and everything was running smoothly until my other half went on maternity leave in Feb 2009 and struggled to make the monthly £230 payment. She spoke to Lloyds who agreed to accept £30 per month for the duration of her reduced income.

 

This started off well but after a couple of months, without warning, Lloyds suddenly increased the monthly Direct Debit to £230. There was insufficient money in her current account to cover this and consequently the figure was returned unpaid and a charge of £30 levied by Lloyds. My other half contacted Lloyds, who after a lot of passing around departments agreed it was a mistake, cancelled the £230 direct debit, refunded the £30 and set up a new direct debit for the agreed £30.

 

For the next two months, exactly the same happened again and £230 was debited from her account, but this time, along with the agreed £30. At one point, despite cancelling the direct debit, Lloyds actually forcibly set up a new one without my other half's permission. This time I wrote to them to complain about breaches of the direct debit guarantee. Lloyds upheld the complaint, apologised for their mistake and awarded £75 compensation.

 

As we had completely lost faith in Lloyds being able to manage a direct debit, my other half insisted that she pay manually in future and after some negotiation, Lloyds furnished some account details for her to make payments to.

 

Unfortunately, however, in November 09, she was taken into hospital and missed the £30 payment. She received a call from Lloyds who said that she had broken the agreement and that they now required in excess of £110 per month from her. She explained she couldn't pay that much and asked to be put back on the agreed £30. Lloyds said that they needed her incomings and outgoings to make this decision, which she gave over the phone. The man did some calculations and agreed that she could stay on the £30 and the call was ended. 10 minutes later, he called back and said he had made a mistake and they could not accept less than £110. She again said she could not pay this much and was told that she would therefore be hearing from their collection agents.

 

On 17th December 09, my other half received a default notice, dated 14th December, demanding the full outstanding balance on the account of over £6600 and giving her until 4th January 2010 to pay it. I have attached a scanned copy of this notice here, pages 1 & 2:

 

http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp192/JRP1414/LloydsLoanDN1.jpg

http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp192/JRP1414/LloydsLoanDN2.jpg

 

On 5th January 10, she then received a letter from SCM Solicitors also demanding the outstanding balance in full:

 

http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp192/JRP1414/LloydsLoanSCM.jpg

 

We have checked her credit file on Credit Expert and there is no default registered. It does however say that she is 6 payments late, which cannot be correct.

 

I did request a copy of the Credit Agreement a little while back, which is attached here:

 

http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp192/JRP1414/LloydsLoanCCA1.jpg

http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp192/JRP1414/LloydsLoanCCA2.jpg

http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp192/JRP1414/LloydsLoanCCA3.jpg

 

and going through the FOS, successfully managed to get the PPI refunded.

 

Since looking through the statements that were sent with the CCA, I have spotted a couple of inaccuracies with the account, where it seems that they have charged back the returned £230 monthly payments more than once, thus incorrectly increasing the debt. They have also charged some fees in relation to this that have not been refunded. So its possible that the amount in debt is disputed too.

 

We have not yet replied to the Default Notice, nor the Solicitors letter and really do not know what step to take next. Should we consider a complaint to Lloyds that cancelling the voluntary agreement after missing one payment, when they took incorrect amounts several times seems quite unfair? Or should we simply contact the Solicitors to see if they will be reasonable and accept the agreed £30?

 

Any help would be gratefully received!

Link to post
Share on other sites

eric.daniels@lloydsTSB.co.uk

 

That would be my port of call, CEO Office.

I can truly appreciate what you're going through, having problems with a similar issue ourselves, just awaiting a response from eric :)

Well his secretary ;)

Somebody else may have alternative suggestions, but that would be mine for starters.

Just explain everything to mr daniels that you have here, and you should have a reply rather sharpish.

 

Best wishes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mills, that's certainly worth a try. I hadn't even considered complaining to the top. You just get to the point where you simply cannot see an end to the ridiculous situation!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JRP:)

 

It is definitely worth a try and I do wish you every success. From my own personal experience of sending both an email and a letter to Mr Daniels, I would say the chances of a response from his office are slim. A similar complaint with the added bonus of referring to apalling verbal abuse on the telephone by a LTSB staff member met with my complaint merely being passed to Customer Service Recovery in Hove. The response received (from a 'Senior Officer') stated that it had been passed to them for 'special attention' and then proceeded to inform me that they had nothing to add to any previous letters I had received in relation to my complaint:(

 

However, let's just hope Mr D and his staff have made New Years resolutions to be more sympathetic to their customers and you receive a more positive reply. Let us know how you get on!

 

Best wishes,

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Landy. I just don't know how these guys excuse their behaviour. I can't imagine a customer writing to the Chief Exec at my work and not receiving a thorough reply to their concerns! What a way to run a business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Landy. I just don't know how these guys excuse their behaviour. I can't imagine a customer writing to the Chief Exec at my work and not receiving a thorough reply to their concerns! What a way to run a business.

 

Ah yes, but this is LTSB we are talking about and I wouldn't trust them as far as I could throw them:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I would not alert them to the problem with the DN - they have certainly ballsed it up arrears must be the arrears and not the total balance.

 

This would become very useful in court if it gets that far.

 

If you alert them they could easily come back with the correct DN and then you are stuffed so to speak I would not contact them regarding this but this is my personal opinion.

 

HH

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...