Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap
    • Evening all looking for bit of advice again , currently doing my own debt management , but think may have burgered up on 1 of the creditors (creation loan) had got sold to Intrum around nov 23 and havent paid anything to it since then , it never went to default ( I thought it did  , now checking credit file , intrum is there and says 1 missed payment and doesnt say account defaulted can i let that go and intrum will default it? hope that makes sense what i have said
    • Hi. You've left the PCN number on the 22nd March letter and your name on the one below that. It's best to cover those up please. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA/Reston threating court action


jason_mnm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 430
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

CB suggested this on the last page and I think it'll do fine:-

 

Its is respectfully requested this case be allocated to the small claims track. It is a straight forward case and is easily resolved on production of the required documentation by the claimant, should the claimant not have the documentation required to progress this case I suggest that there will be no case to answer

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please comment if the following is enforceable othet than legiblity issue:

 

The first page of the aplication form:

 

MBNA Application form-1st page picture by jason_mnm - Photobucket

 

The reverse side of the application form

 

MBNA Application form-reverse side picture by jason_mnm - Photobucket

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit Limit or manner in which it will be determind is there

 

Term stating how the debtor may discharge his obligations by making payments is there

 

term stating the rate of any interest is there

 

 

Therefore the prescribed terms are there and unless you can put forward a positive assertion that shows the front is not the same document as the back ( see Carey v HSBC) then you will not have a hope in hell of arguing this document is unenforceable

Link to post
Share on other sites

They "should" bring the true copy to court with them but in my case they didn't & no matter what I said on the day to see the orig document it was down to the judge lottery (family one) & he favoured Restons even when there was a faulty DN in with it all too.

 

....if you havent got a copy of the orig yourself then have you not got your initial statements to see what interest was on them at the start of the acct opening (were these provided to you in your SAR request)

 

As I can't read the docs posted up due to them being quite faint if the T & C have £12.00 charges on them, then I dont think they were applicable until May 2006 so that in itself could prove the T & C could not have been on the reverse of your document. Just a thought??

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

As expected Restons denied settlement and applied for summary judgement. What should I do now?How can I avoid summary judgement and get full hearing instead?

 

But fact is even if they get the judgement in their favour (which I hope not) they will not get nothing from judgement after looking at my income and expenditure summary prepared by CCCS. It also agreed by most of the lenders even by Tomlin order. In fact they might get nothing for ages or peanut from Judge compare to what I offered them.

 

The house is already under a Tomlin order who owns more than the euqity of the house.

 

Anyway plz tell me how can I avoid summary judgement hearing and get a full hearing instead?

Edited by jason_mnm
Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume you mean Restons turned down your settlement offer and have said they intend to seek SJ against you.

 

You should be able to avoid this because they have, so far, failed to to make a proper claim against you - ie it is not adequately particularised.

 

Have Restons shown no interest in reaching settlement outside of court and have they not suggested a figure they'd be willing to consider or accept.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the difference between Tomlin order and Consent order.

 

What happens if the consent order is signed by Litigant in person?

A consent order is an agreement between both parties that is drawn up and signed by both parties, its then sent into court and if the judge agrees becomes binding on both parties...

Usually its confidential and yes sometimes its called a tomlin order. There is normally a caveat in the agreement that states either side can apply to court if the terms are not kept to.

Shadow done one with Crapone and found it fine. It needs to be read properly and you need to make sure you are both agreeing to the same thing, i.e. it has to be explicitly stated for it to be bound to. Could they alter the monthly amount without your consent No, not without your agreement, hence the consent bit.

 

A Consent Order if drafted in the form of a Tomlin Order acts as a stay on the proceedings and should contain words specifically stating that the action is STAYED on terms. If it is a Tomlin Order it should contain a provision giving liberty for either party to apply which means basically that any party can ask for the stay to be lifted and the matter to be brought back to court for determination at trial in the event of e.g default in making payment.

Had all this copied from the forum ages ago for knowledge which I hope helps explain it for you too.

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could they alter the monthly amount without your consent No, not without your agreement, hence the consent bit.

Can u explain the above plz? U mean they can change the monthy amount without my consent?

 

Thanks to both of u. Also Can Litigant in person sign the Consent order? and also can consent order have schedules?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would consent to an order that you pay £xxx per month. The order cannot be changed without your agreement (consent).

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Consent Order if drafted in the form of a Tomlin Order acts as a stay on the proceedings and should contain words specifically stating that the action is STAYED on terms.

 

Now can u plz tell being Litigant in person can I sign the above kind of Consent order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Consent Order if drafted in the form of a Tomlin Order acts as a stay on the proceedings and should contain words specifically stating that the action is STAYED on terms.

 

Now can u plz tell being Litigant in person can I sign the above kind of Consent order?

 

Hi Jason have you pm'd the shadow, as mentioned he'd done one so he may be able to advise you more on this?

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Annabella,

 

Defending above or below £5K should not affect how complicated or difficult it is. Being well prepared and understanding what you are doing, regardless of the amount you are defending against, is the key to success.

 

However, the cost implications of losing a claim over £5K which is allocated to the Fast Track or Multi Track could be significant if you lose and costs are made against you.

 

The small claims track in civil courts (Leaflet EX306)

The fast track and the multi track (Leaflet EX305)

 

Sorry, Jason, for the hijack. :cool:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Westie whom should I Pm?

 

Jason, I have pm'd the_shadow to pop on by to assist you on your consent/tomlin queries in more detail. Maybe his experience of one will help you further on this. MDAW

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen the PM, if the consent order is open ended then imvho a judge shouldnt allow it as it favours one side over the LiP too much.

 

I cant seem to find the order to look at but if its as described and states they can increase the amount "in the future" then basically you would be signing up to agree to pay whatever they tell you when they tell you otherwise they could bring you back to court for the case to continue.

 

I would suggest you write back and state that as the tomlin/consent order is open ended you cannot commit to anything that puts you in a worse state than you are at present. Again re-iterate any offer you have given previously but state that this is the only viable solution and you would urge them to re-draft the tomlin/consent order in line with your suggestion.

 

HTH

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...