Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA/Arrow/Marlin/Mortimer Solictors **WON**


zamtaff
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5256 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not been able to put the story on site before as in one letter received Mortimers stated that they were looking at the site. SO I HAVE PUT THIS ON THE SITE IN HOPE IT WILL HELP

 

Anyway we won in court £3800.

 

The judge was not particularly helpful and suggested that the application form from MBNA was a credit agreement even with that funny signatute in the top left hand corner. WE discussed what all 4 corners meant as not everything can be put on two sides of the paper. I asked him then were is the clause 11 of T&C refereed to on the front of the application. This was quickly move on.

 

Further,i received a NOA which had the Date of assignment 00/00/00 stated The Judge said i did not need to know the date of assignment as it was commercial sensitive. Beats me why it said the case quote was irrelevant and does not affect that the debt is assigned.

 

DN this was a one that cracked me up the original send to me which i had should a date of 22 Aug 2008 to get the arrears paid, but when i asked for disclose the DN came back with this date being 25 Aug 2008, which would provide the 14 days necessary under s87. This was the only document that was different when i brought this up with the Judge, he was well its a screen dump and the date is an automatic entry Ok but the fist DN notice must stand. We then had a discussion about case law. The case then went to only the arrears being owed. I also gave the Judge my credit file and showed him a entry by Arrow which was before the date there said they owned the debt on the POC. He said so what this is a matter for the IOC.

 

We also had Rankine thrown in.

 

At last we got to were are the statements to show how any of this debt was calculated. None could be produced in Court.

 

After a 10 min rest the judge said unenforceable. On leaving he told the Claimenants solicitor to look up case 8QC52414

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was LIP

 

The T&C were the one's of the Microfiche the Standard issue. Whta i was saying that on the front of the application form is a section "read clause 11" well no where on this form front back is a clause 11. The DJ was try to say the T&C on the microfiche were with the application form. Which we all know is not the case. He did harp on about my signature in the box and that constitutes a credit agreement. I simple asked what was the credit limit how did MBNA work out the APR when must i pay. Anyway 2 hours and 30 mins what a waste of the courts time. but it must have cost Arrow a few bob.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

yesterday 23 Dec 09 I got a letter from Arrow. They have send me

1 Copy Agreement

2 Terms and Conditions

3 Statement of account

 

The letter goes on to say " Please provide your proposal for repayment of your debt. Failure to do so will result in the continuation of collection activity, which in your case may include ligation."

 

I do not like this Arrow Global, what can we do I happy to go all the way

Link to post
Share on other sites

yesterday 23 Dec 09 I got a letter from Arrow. They have send me

1 Copy Agreement

2 Terms and Conditions

3 Statement of account

 

The letter goes on to say " Please provide your proposal for repayment of your debt. Failure to do so will result in the continuation of collection activity, which in your case may include ligation."

 

I do not like this Arrow Global, what can we do I happy to go all the way

 

Is this to do with MBNA ?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I don't have access to the quoted court case.

 

However, as the Judge has ruled the agreement unenforceable, I would point this out to Arrow and point out the issue of estoppal.

 

If they persist, tell them you will return to court to obtain a stop and desist order; with Arrow being liable for the full costs.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...