Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
    • Paula Venomous refused to resign for 16 months and eventually did only because a doctor threatened to resign. Interesting snippets and insights in the article. Paula Vennells clung on to ‘plum’ NHS role after Horizon scandal ARCHIVE.PH archived 19 May 2024 21:49:07 UTC  
    • Just use the print option 'print to pdf' which will save a copy of email as pdf document on your device. If you lived at address as partner when the liability was not settled, then it would be Council Tax legislation they would use. This is designed to stop tenants or owners of a property resident in a property not to pay tax due, when the normal bill payee does not pay the liability due. If you want to know the exact legislation wording, suggest you search for it online, as the legislation is available to view online. If you did not live at address as partner at the time, there is no law they could use.
    • Last week, Washington announce new tariffs on Chinese imports including electric cars and solar panels.View the full article
    • Hi all,   Thank you for your advice. Following the recent developments surrounding the appeal route via Starbucks/Euro Garages, I have not pursued this route. Following my original post I have since received a "PARKING CHARGE FINAL REMINDER" but will just proceed to ignore this as is my right to do so. It is helpful to upload this for others to see? As the registered keeper, I am happy that I am not liable for the parking charge as the notice has not been served in accordance with Schedule 4 of POFA: specifically paragraph 9(2)(f) (warning to registered keeper that creditor has the right to recover from the keeper) and paragraph 9(4) (serving notice within 14 days of alleged contravention). I look forward to seeing MET Parking Services in court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Attempting to recover our deposit help please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5298 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning

 

Just found this website by chance and hoping I maybe able to gain some assistance from your goodselves so here goes:-

 

Our tenancy agreement was due to fiinsh on 1st November 2009. I contact Landlord by telephone (who lives next door) to state that after 12 months at the property we would like to leave, due to excessive noise and anti-social behavoir from other properties in the block, and as shift workers (both myself and partner work for emergency services) this was becoming an issue.

 

He agreed and said he was sorry and I asked him about notice he stated 1 month was fine and this was confirmed by me by letter and posted through his door by hand.

 

we have now recieved a letter from them stating we did not give two months notice and they are withholding £950 from our deposit for 1 months rent in lieu of notice.

 

This was sent 10 days after our departure.

 

Can anyone advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say "Our tenancy agreement was due to fiinsh on 1st November 2009".

 

If you left on or before then, you don't need to give any notice at all!

 

Was your deposit protected? If it was, raise a dispute with the relevant scheme. If it wasn't, then you can use the threat of a 3x penalty for failure to protect as a negotiating position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes deposit was protected and have started the dispute process but this is our first time with this and are unsure what to expect!!!

 

Can you expand on this no notice required suggestion anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, if the landlord accepted one month's notice then that should be that. But obviously you may need to prove it, and I don't know where the burden lies. So the following assumes you cannot prove you gave notice:

 

What date did you leave the property?

 

Your contract was for 12 months. If you want, you can leave on or before 12 months as long as you pay for the 12 months. You don't have to give notice.

 

You cannot end the tenancy before the 12 months are up unless there is a break clause (which might be one, two or whatever months' notice - whatever you agree with the landlord).

 

If you did not leave until after 1st November it would have become a "statutory periodic tenancy" where to end it one rental month's notice is required by you or 2 months' notice if the landlord wants to end it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve M some really helpful information there copyed and pasted this from the "Short Term Tenancy Agreement"

 

1.6.1 The Term shall be for a definite period of twelve calendar months from and including 1st November 2008 to and including 31st October 2009.

1.6.2 If the Tenant remains in the Property beyond the end of the initial fixed term and no new fixed term

Tenancy comes into being then the Tenant will have a Statutory Periodic Tenancy by virtue of Section 5 of the Housing Act 1988.

1.6.3 The “Term” is to include any extension or continuation of the fixed term (but not a replacement tenancy for another fixed term) or as a Statutory or Contractual Periodic Tenancy.

However further on the tenancy agreement states

 

 

2.5 Tenants Break Clause

 

 

2.5.1 If the Tenant intends to vacate at the end of the fixed term he must give the Landlord at least two months notice in writing.

2.5.2 The Tenant may bring the tenancy to an end at any time (but not within six months of the commencement date) by giving the Landlord at least two months notice in writing from the rent due date stated in clause 1.7.4.

 

 

 

 

Is what you have already said still valid?

 

They are also attempting to claim for alledged damages that were already present how do we stand on that?

Edited by andycuk
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you left 31 October, then NO notice was required. If you left after then (1st Nov?) then you had to give a minimum 1 months notice ending on the last day of the month. This is called a Statutory Periodic Tenancy and overwrites any notice periods specified in your tenancy agreement. Therefore, if you left on 1st Nov you are responsible for rent until 30th November.

 

With regard to deposit deductions for damage - was an inventory carried out when you moved in, did you sign it? If the answer is no then the LL will not be able to prove that the damage wasn't there when you moved in, and as such you have nothing to worry about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that we left on the 31st October at 1500 and have a letter from the LL confirming that.

 

Sorry to be a pain but why does it overwrite what is in tenancy agreement?

 

You entered into a "Fixed Term" of 12 months (section 1.6.1 of your agreement) as such, you can not be penalised for not staying longer. At the date of signing, you agreed that you were only staying for 12 months - in effect you gave 12 months notice!

 

Having left the property on 31/10 you didn't enter into a SPT and therefore it doesn't overwrite it but section 2.5.1. is unenforceable because of what I said above.

Edited by Snorkerz
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with Snorkerz. But also you should bring the following document from the OFT on Unfair Terms in tenancy contracts to the attention of your landlord or the dispute resolution service. See 3.78:

 

"A tenant is not required to give notice to bring the tenancy to an end at the end of the fixed term... "

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/unfair_contract_terms/oft356.pdf

 

PS. This document is very useful for checking lots of other requirements in tenancy contracts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with Snorkerz. But also you should bring the following document from the OFT on Unfair Terms in tenancy contracts to the attention of your landlord or the dispute resolution service. See 3.78:

 

"A tenant is not required to give notice to bring the tenancy to an end at the end of the fixed term... "

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/unfair_contract_terms/oft356.pdf

 

PS. This document is very useful for checking lots of other requirements in tenancy contracts.

 

Useful link Steve_M. Would add for OPs benefit that this is 'guidance', not 'law' so they should be careful how they use it. ie it's fine to say "the office of fair trading say" but its dangerous to say "the law is..."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...