Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A&L Financial Hardship Payout YEEEEPEEE


Rachlouie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5299 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Friday 16th October I gathered my spreadsheet of bank charges £1450 in one year!!! I completed my financial hardship letter and posted it for the attention of Alison Reilly at A&L normal address, Bootle.

3 weeks later I was starting to think why haven't I heard anything, when on my doorstep was a letter complete with Income and Expenditure form to complete. I was very honest with the details on this form and in my opinion my husband and I are in a sinking ship at the moment with some many bills like waves and they are all shouting louder and we are struggling to be able to last the month without having to take some item to cash converters for the cash on a buy back. I received the form saturday morning and by saturday afternoon it was back in the post 1st class (their expense). I did enclose letter's from our Housing Association with an Intent to Seek Possession, council tax forms showing how behind we are, car finance letter's - the works. Tonight I have just checked my bank account and there is over £1000 in there. I do believe that they have refunded £1015 of my £1450. I am so exicited and can't believe this sort of thing happens to me. I was only sat here thinking earlier of how I was going to afford Christmas let alone pay bills. :D I now have to use this money wisely.

Abbey - Sent Data Protection Act Letter 14/06/06

Received letter 26/06/06 microfiche argument

Sent microfiche argument letter 27/06/06 recorded delivery

Received bank statements for 15 months 30/06/06

Received printout of charges for April / March 2005 06/07/06

Sent LBA 07/06/06 (Template 1)

Re-sent LBA to two different addresses 18/07/06

Received another fob off microfiche story 20/07/06

:o Sent LBA in answer to microfiche again 26/07/06

Received another two fob off microfiche letters 26/07/06

Sent LBA Template 2 26/07/06 wait seven days

Went to court with N1 forms 10/08/06 Claimed served on 12 August abbey have until 29/8/06

:DReceived microfiche statements back to 2000 !!!

:-oSending letter before action with schedule of charges today 28/09/08.

Claim acknowledged Abbey have until 24/10.

Received 50% offer 25/10 along with defence

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant news. Well done.

In these days of doom and gloom, it's good to hear something positive, occasionally.

 

Regards, Rooster.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Or maybe they have a feeling what the outcome of the test case will be. Or rather I should say they know the attempt to overturn the earlier legal judgement is doomed to fail. If the court rules that the OFT doesn't have the power to rule on charges well then its a bit pointless them existing really isn't it???

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Rachlouie. This is brilliant news, but make sure you still claim for the rest of your charges. If you could still do with more to help you out of your hardship, then let A&L know that, otherwise put a claim in at court for the rest of what you're owed.;)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Rachlouie. This is brilliant news, but make sure you still claim for the rest of your charges. If you could still do with more to help you out of your hardship, then let A&L know that, otherwise put a claim in at court for the rest of what you're owed.;)

Caro, I refer you to the FSA Waiver on bank charges point 13.16:

 

"(16) if the firm attempts to resolve a relevant charges complaint after 27 July 2007:

(a) the firm must not seek agreement from the complainant that the resolution is in full and final settlement of the matter;

(b) in relation to such complaints, if the outcome of the test case produces a result that is more favourable to the complainant, the firm must take all reasonable steps to pay any difference in the amount of compensation actually received by the complainant and that that the complainant would have been entitled if his claim has not been settled by the firm then; and

© the firm must explain the implications of its approach and commitment;"

 

relevant part is highlighted in bold.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

There you go rachlouie. Yourbank has confirmed what I've said, so don't let A&L fob you off if you could do with the rest of your money now instead of waiting for the test case and OFT investigation to finish.

 

If you quote the part yourbank has highlighted in your letter to them, they can't argue that they don't need to do more.

 

Thanks YB.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There you go rachlouie. Yourbank has confirmed what I've said, so don't let A&L fob you off if you could do with the rest of your money now instead of waiting for the test case and OFT investigation to finish.

 

If you quote the part yourbank has highlighted in your letter to them, they can't argue that they don't need to do more.

 

Thanks YB.

 

No problems but the OP has only had a Full and Final settlement of the hardship part of the claim. The rest is still live subject to the OFT test case issues resolution.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problems but the OP has only had a Full and Final settlement of the hardship part of the claim. The rest is still live subject to the OFT test case issues resolution.

 

What makes you say it's F&F settlement of the hardship part of the claim YB. If the OP is still suffering hardship she should tell the bank if the settlement is inadequate for her needs now.

 

Is there anything to say that customers can only claim hardship once and have to accept the banks first offer or part settlement?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What makes you say it's F&F settlement of the hardship part of the claim YB. If the OP is still suffering hardship she should tell the bank if the settlement is inadequate for her needs now.

 

Is there anything to say that customers can only claim hardship once and have to accept the banks first offer or part settlement?

 

On the first part of what you have said the question needs to be asked to the OP, ie does it meet their needs. From post 1 I think the OP is certainly happy with it thus far.

The Hardship guide you have written makes no mention of negotiation and there is no provision or guidance given to banks that they have to refund 100% of the charges if the person is in financial hardship. They don't have to accept the offer but the OP got a payout of over 50% of the claim which, unless they can prove that charges further back, caused their current hardship, would be difficult to argue. Personally, I think the payout is pretty good.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the first part of what you have said the question needs to be asked to the OP, ie does it meet their needs. From post 1 I think the OP is certainly happy with it thus far.

 

The Hardship guide you have written makes no mention of negotiation and there is no provision or guidance given to banks that they have to refund 100% of the charges if the person is in financial hardship. They don't have to accept the offer but the OP got a payout of over 50% of the claim which, unless they can prove that charges further back, caused their current hardship, would be difficult to argue. Personally, I think the payout is pretty good.

 

It certainly is pretty good and I'm sure the OP is delighted to have got something, but the point of my original post was to let her know that if it isn't enough to get her out of hardship, she can ask for more.

 

Speaking personally, my hardship lasted in excess of 20 years, and I'm sure I'm not alone in that bank charges were probably one of the main reasons for it due to the spiral effect.

 

I think the points made are now clear and fully explained for rachlouie, but if you want to continue to debate the issues on another thread Yourbank, perhaps in the hardship forum, I'll try and take a peek when my daughter has returned to uni after her weekend visit home. :-)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It certainly is pretty good and I'm sure the OP is delighted to have got something, but the point of my original post was to let her know that if it isn't enough to get her out of hardship, she can ask for more.

 

Speaking personally, my hardship lasted in excess of 20 years, and I'm sure I'm not alone in that bank charges were probably one of the main reasons for it due to the spiral effect.

 

I think the points made are now clear and fully explained for rachlouie, but if you want to continue to debate the issues on another thread Yourbank, perhaps in the hardship forum, I'll try and take a peek when my daughter has returned to uni after her weekend visit home. :-)

 

The issue re hardship is about when income becomes insufficient to cover "reasonable living expenses and meet financial commitments as they become due;"

Reasonable living expenses would not include loans, credit cards, store cards, etc,etc, but would include mortgage or rent, council tax, utilities, HP on a car used for work, Income tax bill, or collectively known as priority debt arrears. Let's be honest, there are times when we are very very brassic but it doesn't necessarily lead to missing those essential payments. I doubt you have been evicted for the last 20 years or threatened to be imprisoned for the whole of the last 20 years.

Furthermore in advice give by the FSA to firms who use the waiver from March this year "a consideration of a refund of charges, in particular where the charges may have added to the FD during, or immediately before, the period of Financial Difficulty"

 

So income minus charges lead to less money to pay priority debt arrears leading to arrears and therefore refund should be considered.

 

I hope that makes sense. As for the rest of the stuff. I think you know what I think of the financial hardship guide based specifically on the fact of innuendo and lack or real advice on what they need to do(thread announcing the guide is shut so can't discuss the issues in a constructive manner).

I assume, as a complete aside, that the washing machine has been on most of yesterday if your daughter is back from uni for the weekend ;)

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue re hardship is about when income becomes insufficient to cover "reasonable living expenses and meet financial commitments as they become due;"

Reasonable living expenses would not include loans, credit cards, store cards, etc,etc, but would include mortgage or rent, council tax, utilities, HP on a car used for work, Income tax bill, or collectively known as priority debt arrears. Let's be honest, there are times when we are very very brassic but it doesn't necessarily lead to missing those essential payments. I doubt you have been evicted for the last 20 years or threatened to be imprisoned for the whole of the last 20 years.

Furthermore in advice give by the FSA to firms who use the waiver from March this year "a consideration of a refund of charges, in particular where the charges may have added to the FD during, or immediately before, the period of Financial Difficulty"

 

So income minus charges lead to less money to pay priority debt arrears leading to arrears and therefore refund should be considered.

 

I hope that makes sense. As for the rest of the stuff. I think you know what I think of the financial hardship guide based specifically on the fact of innuendo and lack or real advice on what they need to do(thread announcing the guide is shut so can't discuss the issues in a constructive manner).

I assume, as a complete aside, that the washing machine has been on most of yesterday if your daughter is back from uni for the weekend ;)

 

You can assume and doubt what you like yourbank, but you know nothing about my situation. You are entitled to your opinions and I'm entitled to mine which are based on my knowledge and experiences. We don't have to agree. This site is about empowering people by giving them information to make informed decisions.

 

Rachlouie is very happy to have got some of her money back. She has had a positive result, and we've both reminded her that she still has choices that she can make. Let's not spoil her moment of pleasure.;)

 

If you wish to add further to your issues over the advice on this site Yourbank, please do as previously requested and start a thread in the appropriate forum.

 

Apologies rachlouie for the hijack of your thread.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If anyone feels that CAG has helped get their money back and can spare a little, donations are always appreciated.;)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...