Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Two Years 6 Months After Cca Request Court Claim Received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5268 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have also posted this in "Tale of a dodgy DN"

 

 

 

I have a question?

 

Request cca from card company 2 and a half years ago along with a subject access request.

 

To this day nothing received apart from invalid default notice and letter saying "we are trying to obtain a legal copy of your agreement"

 

In the two and a half years since cca request I have received voluntary charge on house forms/requests from solicitors followed by a statutory demand which I set aside.

 

A letter from solicitors saying they are trying to obtain a legal copy of my agreement and all action on hold till they get copy.

 

Six months later another letter from solicitors saying " you set aside SD 6 months ago , would you now care to pay us this unenforceable debt".

 

Alleged debt sold on to another company represented by same solicitors which are all connected.

 

Another default notice issued from new company by same solicitors two years after original default notice.

 

County court claim form received demanding full amount.

 

 

Do I bother with any default notice issues in my defence or just no CCA game over, obviously listing the previous two and a half years of harrasment etc.

 

Regards

 

Santos

Springfield

Link to post
Share on other sites

Santos,

 

In the first instance you would need to submit the acknowledgement of service stating you wish to defend in full (if that is what you are going to do).

 

You will then need to send a CPR31.14 request letter to the claimant/solicitor asking for all relevant documentation, including Default Notice, agreement, Notice of Assignment, Deed of Assignment, statements of account etc.

 

Please provide more details of the case if possible.

e.g post up the particulars of claim and D/N minus personal details to give people a better understanding of what is going on.

 

When was the claim form dated?

 

Regards

-

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, my comments are based on information learnt or

obtained and from my own experiences.

-

Case 1 - C L Finance - Court Case 'Stayed' :-). Stay Lifted - N149 AQ Received & Filed. Case Struck Out :grin:

-

Case 2 - C L Finance - Defence Filed. N150 AQ Received & Filed. Case 'Settled by Consent' :)

-

Case 3 - EOS Solutions - No Agreement - Account Closed ~£3500. :grin:

-

Advice & opinions offered freely but informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment and seek advice from a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Santos,

 

In the first instance you would need to submit the acknowledgement of service stating you wish to defend in full (if that is what you are going to do).

 

You will then need to send a CPR31.14 request letter to the claimant/solicitor asking for all relevant documentation, including Default Notice, agreement, Notice of Assignment, Deed of Assignment, statements of account etc.

 

Please provide more details of the case if possible.

e.g post up the particulars of claim and D/N minus personal details to give people a better understanding of what is going on.

 

When was the claim form dated?

 

Regards

 

Hi GD

 

AOS= done

 

CPR 31.14 = done

 

Default notice = invalid

 

POC = usual, default on credit agreement, served default notice, terminated agreement, full amount due etc etc.

 

All time scales adhered to.

 

Regards

 

Santos

Springfield

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GD

 

AOS= done

 

CPR 31.14 = done

 

Default notice = invalid

 

POC = usual, default on credit agreement, served default notice, terminated agreement, full amount due etc etc.

 

All time scales adhered to.

 

Regards

 

Santos

 

Hi Santos,

 

How long do you have left before the 28days is up on the AOS?

 

As I understand it, they have sent you nothing for 2 and a half years so i'm assuming that they sent nothing with the POC!

 

In that case, you still cannot defend so your next course of action would be to submit an embarressed defence. Will give them an outline of your defence or your intent to defend and you may (or may not) hear anymore. Have a look around some of the other threads along these lines. If you're still unsure i'd be happy to point you in the right direction but hopefully someone a little more knowledgeable than me will be along soon.

 

As GD says, get as much info up as poss and you'll get plenty of help.

 

M

Edited by MandM
typo

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

update

 

cpr request sent and I received 8 years of statements, an application form and copy of NOA and a copy of a second default notice because they dont need to rely on the original which terminated the account 2 years ago and is invalid which I still have in its original envelope.

 

I thought once an account was terminated it cannot just be kept live as it were. They terminated account 2 years ago and I said fine take me to court and let the courts decide how much I pay you and 2 years later here I am going to court. Talk about dragging things out why didnt they do it 2 years ago?

 

I have been threatened with all kinds of nasty things and even set aside a statutory demand from these people. Can I counter claim for harrasment or anything else?

 

When I do the defence can I keep it short and sweet in reply to their POC and just note down where certain rulings on certain cases came from in relation to the CCA and certain laws and when it gets to court just have the full transcripts etc in triplicate for me the judge and the claimant.

 

Any ideas as always appreciated

 

Regards

 

Santos

Springfield

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, can you scan and post up a copy of the agreement and default notice ensuring all personal info is removed.

 

In the CPR 31.14 letter did you state you would supply the defence 14 days from receiving the response?

 

As to the termination, the account can only be terminated once... you'd have to argue the toss with them in court, but they have terminated the account once, if its not live how can they terminate again..... and if they have terminated wrongly then its unlawful recession of contract I believe.

 

If you post up the docs it'll help people advise.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shadow

 

Thanks for the response. I do not have access to a scanner at the moment but the application form is just that, an application form with no prescribed terms etc.

 

The terms and conditions accompanying it could be from anywhere. There is nothing to tie the two together.

 

The account was definately terminated and the claimant confirms this in their POC.

 

I am baffled as how to proceed it seems they contradict everything they have set out in their POC.

 

Regards

 

Santos

Springfield

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...