Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage Express appoint LPA Recievers Walker Singleton to scare tenants off!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4085 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi chillinlong

 

I was 1st made aware that a proerty was about to be sold when I received a redemption statement from MEx, I called to ask why they'd sent it & was told that the property was being sold.

 

I found out that the others were up for sale (all with agents local to the properties) when I looked on the web site for Sequence & Fox & Sons.

We have contacted LPA twice now via e-mail & recorded delivery letters asking for details of pending sales, copies of 3 valuations, HIPs reports, insurance details, details of viewings etc....the list goes on.

I don't think any of you will be surprised to know that I haven't had any kind of reply.

I asked dear old MEx what was going on...usual reply, 'we don't know, contact receivers as they are your agents' yeah right!

 

Regarding form n244, I have read through loads of posts both on this forum & in general on the web & it seems as though people have had limited success getting a court to agree to letting the borrower sell when a receiver is in place.

I will pm 'nukum' to see how he got on, but in the meantime does anyone have any personal experience of success or failure in going down this route?

 

Thank you for your support, how are you getting on with your fight?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Evening all

 

I think the idea of all making complaint to FOS would at least highlight there is a problem with Mex & Receivers. However they are funded by the banking industry and I am not entirely sure they are particularly effective. It seems that if a lender/bank throws in an objection on grounds of time etc they back off. Mex are masters of the art of delaying tactics and misleading.

 

Mungo's Mum - am I right in understanding that no notification of sale was received by you from anyone?

Regards

Meerkat One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Meerkat One

 

I think everyone making a complaint FOS at around the same time would be a really good idea, at least then FOS may be able to 'join up the dots' and see a picture emerging.

I wonder if we maybe should also all write to our MP's, again I don't expect much to be done but if across the country they were all individually made aware of the situation then our situation may be raised when they are having drinks together in their private watering holes, and there is an election looming!

 

You are correct in your understanding, I received no notification of a sale. All I have ever received is a redemption statement and then yesterday a letter telling me how much I now owe due to the shortfall.

 

I don't know about you but I am pretty sure that much of this has to be airing on the side of illegal, what I don't know is how to go about fighting any of this and good solicitors are just far too expensive at the moment.

 

We could do with some sharp youngster who wants to make a name for themselves on the legal front who will put up a fight and then charge us when the fight is won.

I've spoken to firms who occasionally do 'Pro Bono' work but they are not interested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mungo's Mum

That is something I am working on! The trouble with the law firms is they do not want to lose their banking customers. I am sure if you are the legal owner then surely you should have known what was going on? It just makes it all the more underhand.

 

Meerkat One

 

 

 

Meerkat One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Meerkat One

 

I agree, as the owner I should be told what is going on. Unfortunately this seems to be normal conduct with both MEx and the receivers.

I am having a row with 'Templetons' LPA at the moment trying to get information out of them as to whether or not they have insured a property. It has been wrecked by water damage from burst pipes during the very cold weather. The ceilings are down, flooring has lifted, the new kitchen is totally destoyed etc. My arguement is that I would have had to have the property insured and I would have claimed under the insurance.

I am begining to think that they did not have insurance (even though in their letter of acceptance of receivership they state they will insure the properties) they are very coy about providing me with the insurance details. I was under the impression that under the terms of the mortgage contract the property had to be insured for the life of the mortgage.

 

On a slightly different note, we believe that we may have something to challenge both MEx and the receivers regarding their contracts. It's not about securitisation. I know it may seem as though I'm being paranoid but I don't really want to go into too much detail here. I have been in touch with Bona who has given me the details of a good contract QC they used a while ago to successfully challenge MEx albeit on a different contract matter.

I'll p.m you with more details later in the week once I've hopefully had a chance to speak with the barrister.

 

Mungos mum x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received letter from MEx telling me that they have sold one of my properties leaving me with a shortfall of around £60k.

This is the first of quite a few they have up for sale.

As they have emptied the properties of tenants and let them fall into various states of disrepair all are up for much less than I owe.

 

I am still waiting for a reply from the receivers regarding claiming from their insurance as at least 2 of the properties have been totally wrecked by pipes bursting during the cold spell.

 

Caro do you have any idea how we could go about petitioning a judge to put a temporary halt to furture sales? I really do need to buy myself some time before they sell all my properties, leaving me with nothing worth fighting for.

Many thanks

MM x

 

You need to SAR both MEx and WS if you haven't already. If you have and they haven't complied in 40 days then send an LBA informing them you will take them to court for non-compliance and then do that if they still fail. Also complain to the Information Commissioners Office.

 

Phone RICS as a matter of urgency for advice. They have a code of conduct for their members and I hope would want to know about this. Ask them what you should expect of an LPA, and if they can't help you, ask them for contact details of an organisation that can help you.

 

I don't know much about them or how effective they are, but it may be worth looking at the Residential Landlords Association. It does cost money to join them but once you've paid (I think about £70) they have a free advice line, and forums for members which may help you find people with similar experiences.

 

Hi All Have just been catching up. I have a complaint with FOS and mex have tried every trick to stall even claiming my complaint was out of time with FOS (6 months). Have more info so it is ongoing. The Receivers have not stood down whilst complaint going through and it appears everytime I start again with mex they make contact again. You have to ring every day and ask any questions you can. I did a SAR with mex and received half of the info am now pushing for rest. Contact their legal department direct not case managers.

 

FOS will take forever, and it's not unusual for them to take in excess of a year to respond. Phone FOS, and also contact the Office of Fair Trading.

 

While I understand caggers concerns about the site being monitored by those they are fighting, if people do not post openly others cannot help. Those experiencing similar problems will also find themselves in the same situation as you are now. By bringing these issues into the public domain, and getting an understanding of the scale of them (I suspect this is affecting an awful lot of people), there is more chance of fighting these immoral (and quite possibly unlawful) practices so that these companies are forced to change their ways, helping everyone in the long term.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caro Thanks for that advice. You are right about the FOS. In my case although they are acknowledging there is a case they are allowing MEX to claim the 6 months time limit. It is no coincidence that MEX has now sent me the information I requested over a year ago which proves my complaint. This information proves my case. I will now refer to FSA and OFT.

Regards

Meerkat One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you explain about the 6 month time limit. Is it because you left it too long before complaining?:confused:

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caro After the lender has sent their final response you have six months in which to complain to the FOS. After this time they are unable to investigate the complaint. In my case there were a number of issues and I did not feel that a final response had been given as these were uncovered as I delved deeper. Each time the lender was "investigating" the issues as I uncovered errors. Having thought they genuinely were looking to see if errors had been made I now realise they were not and just playing for time so when I made my complaint to FOS they claimed it was out of the six month time limit. They then sent me all the information I had been requesting for over a year which proved the errors I had been claiming. It was a lesson learned - the rules of fairness do not apply to Banks and they will use any means whether underhand or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah I understand now. Thanks. They usually say 8 weeks or a final response if sooner I think, but as you say, it was a lesson learned. FOS and FSA are made up of bankers so brings into question their impartiality in dealing with complaints, so I don't set great store by either I'm afraid.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a letter from our local council today saying that as a property I own has been sold they will not require payment from me for the council tax!

 

This is the 1st I'd heard of it, I didn't know it was up for sale, let alone sold.

 

Contacted MEx who told me to call receivers...I explained, yet again, that receivers are not responding to my e-mails or letters and that I would not deal with them on the 'phone in case conversations are misinterpreted.

I was told by the person I was dealing with that they could see the information regarding this property on the screen. I asked for a copy of all the info on the screen...oh no I have to do another subject access request and wait for the usual 40 days (if I'm lucky) for them to comply.

I've asked what other proprties he could see on the screen that have been sold....."very sorry" he said "I'll have to get authorisation from someone higher up to divulge that information". I'm afraid to say that by this time I was so cross that I shouted at him saying that it's MY information & then hung up on him. Not a sensible thing to do I know, but I'd just about had enough of listening to the garbage coming out of his mouth.

Still I suppose I'll find out about the next property that's been sold by someone such as our local milkman!

 

Sorry for rant but I am so fed up with dealing with all of these crooks, that I'm getting to the point of just wanting to walk away, let them take everything and then spend the rest of my life on benefits. I really can't see much light at the end of the tunnel at the moment.

 

MM x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand how angry you must be feeling. Do you know who the property was sold to? If you haven't received any responses to your SAR either to MEX or Receivers within the 40 days inform the Information Commissioners Office. You should not have to do another SAR - this is mex stalling tactics. Phone lending complaints directly 0844 8921913. Surely in order to sell a property the Lender/Receiver has to apply for repossession to take legal ownership? I am trying to find out the process and any information you can give me would help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Sorry Ive not been around in the last few days.

 

Mungos mum, I would contact Police and report damage to them of the proeprty, get a crime reference number and then send a letter to LPA along with a copy to MX and that you expect them deal with their insurers to get the property repaired otherwise you will be holding them liable for all losses incurred on this property. They always say they cannot do anything unless they have this, there is no excuse if this is provided up front.

 

Another way to check if properties are sold is to do a land registry check on each one, costs £4. Is that the sole agent that are selling the properties for MX? and are they selling for market value.

 

When you recieved the letter from the LPA recievers, is there an email address you can report to on there? then this keeps your copies of writing to them requesting info.

 

First thing to do is to complain to MX chief, then they will have to look into what is going on. I never do anything by phone either as I do not trust any of them.

 

Would be interested for your barristers details if he thinks anything of these cases as I will pursue if I can, I approached a few solicitors, but they say it is too much work and that LPA recievers are experts in bringing so many excuses as the law backs them. But I do not agree as their tactics are clearly wrong so I am not giving up and will fight them to the death.

 

Please dont give up and keep trying, as Winston Churchill was it:

 

"Never give in! Never give in! Never, never, never, never - in nothing great or small, large or petty. Never give in, except to convictions of honour and good sense."

 

Meerkat one, are you sure they have provided you with everything for example conversations with LPA recievers etc, if they have not get on the phone to infromation commisioners office and say that you are still waiting for details 6 months later. Then they might start a request with them and then if more paperworks comes along the 6 month rule does not exist as fresh case.

Edited by chillinlong
Extra comments
Link to post
Share on other sites

No they did not provide telephone conversations. I am still waiting for MEX to send me any information re receivers - letters, notes invoices relating to my accounts. When they sent the first half then eventually the second half nothing relating to receivers was included. I have been in contact with their legal dept and also sent in all the original letters requesting this info. They are trying to claim I have to submit another SAR but told them it was all part of original and as they sent the other in dribs and drabs they can get on with this. Will get onto them today as they have had time - trying to claim it may be stored in their archives in a form they cannot send! What rubbish!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write a letter to MX tell them as part of the original SAR request you are still waiting for the telephone conversations etc.

 

Then report to FOS and say that you are still waiting on MX providing info and that you have taken this up with information commisioners office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

Been on Holiday, Sick, made redundant, Sick so had a lot going on suffice to say in the meantime MEX have been busy, After having the eviction notice cancelled they sent me a letter to say that an LPA would be instructed on my property soon ..lo and behold I get a letter from MovewithUs telling me that they've been instructed to manage the property. Now I got their letter on the 10th Feb but I've just spoken to my management agency and they tell me that MovewithUs got in touch with the tenant directly on 1st Feb And when I spoke to Ms C Hull on the 11th of Feb no mention was made that they had been in contact that early. So we now have another group of f*cking turds to add to the mix with S&W and Templetons and they haven't wasted anytime trying to scare off the tenant.

 

I'm on the phone now with MEX trying to find out whats going on (11.20)

I think this is further proof that they have no interest in "helping you manage" I mean the easiest thing to do would be just to tell my management agency to pay them direct but that would too easy and it would mean that I could hang on to my property.

 

But they want the whole thing so that they can sell it and get you of their books.

 

Now They're going to raise a complaint and get back to me within 15days I'll eat my mum's hat if that happens.

 

dOOTS

Edited by doots14
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Doots, sorry to hear about this.

 

I would not speak to them on the phone as nobody has a clue as to what is going on there.

 

Try to write to the chief executive of MX outlining your problems and and that you want an explanation to what they are now doing? If they do not know then you want to know what the LPA recievers are doing, it is their responsibility to find out for you. The problem is they think the hand lies with the LPA reciever once appointed as it protects them from any legal issues, the law backs the LPA reciever very strongly as they can come up with excuses all day long that protects them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Doots

 

Very sorry to hear your woes. Don't know how much luck you had with MEX yesterday. Don't wait for them to raise a complaint go direct to Lending Complaints 0844 8921913/01274 554093. Otherwise they will continually fob you off with " we are investigating" etc for several weeks whilst they work on your properties. The intimidation does not stop whilst they look into the complaint. The Receiver is obliged to provide info as are MEX. They are both in regular contact and MEX receive reports. I know that WS/Nutrade keep visiting my properties and it is now bordering on harrassment. Their sole aim is to intimidate the tenants so they leave and you know the rest.

 

Regards

 

Meerkat One

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4085 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...