Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
    • They are finding new ways to cut back on household spending as China’s economy loses steam.View the full article
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GE Money PPI on Mortgage & a Secured Loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4712 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks for the reply. Yes I would like some help with the POC please as I have not done this before, and I am looking to do with with cap one also :)

 

Your help is very much appreciated :D

 

Hi, Delcarik,

 

I think you'll enjoy the process, and the result even more!

 

Is your claim against Cap One a credit card charges claim? If so, have you got the statements for the last 6 years?

 

BAE :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, have the N1 form now and wanted to know what I put in the brief details of claim. Am I just putting there that I am claiming back charges relating to my account being in arrears ? Do I need to word it in a certain way?

 

Thanks for any help. Also, BAE are you able to help me with the POC? I don't know where to start with this :confused:

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Deli,

 

The brief details of claim section should specify the amounts you're claiming - so you need to do an estimate of the interest they've charged, (on their charges!) too. Don't get too wrapped up in getting a precise figure; if they complain about it being too much, they will have to provide a figure themselves.

 

Because it's at the court claim stage, you're also allowed to charge them 8% interest on the charges. Again, don't worry about getting an exact figure, just work it out as best you can.

 

* you can get rid of this part if you like - it's simply saying that you want to also claim from now until the day of judgment any further interest that is accrued. You work this out by doing the calculation below:

 

Amount of Claim x 0.00022

 

(so if amount of claim is £1200, you do £1200 x 0.00022 = £0.26 per day

 

So, something like this will suffice:

 

This is a money claim for the return of charges and associated interest applied to the Claimant's mortgage account, number XXXXXXXXXXXX by the Defendant.

 

Charges £xxx.xx

Interest on charges £xxx.xx

 

Interest at 8%, under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 £xxx.xx

*(and at a daily rate of £x.x until date of judgment)

 

TOTAL £ xxx.xx

BAE :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

. . . Just thought, the asterisk*** part of the previous post should be at the bottom!

 

Another thought - you can claim charges on your secured loan and mortgage on the same form, in case you weren't sure.

 

Now for the Particulars of Claim:

 

Below is a template which you can adapt to your circumstances - copy, paste, edit!

 

I would suggest you should also add a whole new paragraph to the PoC regarding the recent FSA fines etc, of which you will know more than me!

 

 

 

IN THE XXXXXX COUNTY COURT

 

 

BETWEEN

 

 

 

XXXXXXXX

 

 

Claimant

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

GE Money

 

Defendant

 

 

 

 

PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

 

 

 

 

 

The Agreement

 

 

1. The Claimant entered into an agreement with the Defendant on X/XX/XX, whereby the Defendant advanced a sum to the Claimant under a mortgage account, Account no XXXXXXXX

 

Summary

 

2. Throughout the course of the Agreement, the Defendant has added numerous default charges to the Account for the Claimant’s failure to make the minimum payment on the due date and / or if a payment is returned. (Full particulars are set out in the attached schedule of charges sent to the defendant on XX/X/XX ).

 

3. The default charges were applied in accordance with the standard terms of The Agreement, which were:

 

a). A penalty payable on breach of contract and thus unenforceable: and or

 

b) An unfair term under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (“The Regulations”) and therefore not binding on the Claimant.

 

4. The Claimant is accordingly entitled to repayment of the sums wrongly added to the Account.

 

 

The Charges

 

5. The Charges consisted of various amounts of £XX, £XX and £XXX. For each of these charges, the defendant merely sent out one electronic letter to inform the claimant of the charge, which I estimate at costing approximately £1.00.

 

(Add any further details here on what GE money actually ‘do’ when you’re in arrears, eg phone call, letters. You are basically attempting to prove that their costs are much lower than the charges!!!)

 

6. The amount of the Charges exceeded any genuine pre-estimate of the damage that would have been suffered by the defendant in relation to the Claimant’s transgressions. This is confirmed in law in the case of Castaneda and others vs Clydebank Engineering and Shipbuilding Company. Ltd. (1904) when the House of Lords held that a contractual party can only recover damages for actual or liquidated losses incurred from a breach of contract. This was confirmed in Dunlop Pneumatic Co vs New Garage and Motor Co. Ltd. (1915), which held that a penalty clause is void in its entirety and therefore unenforceable.

 

7. Therefore the Charges were punitive and a penalty and thus unenforceable at common law.

 

 

 

 

 

The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999,

 

8. At all material times the Claimant was a consumer within the Regulations.

 

9. At all material times the terms of the Agreement providing for the Charges were unfair within regulation 5 of the Regulations in that contrary to the requirement of good faith they caused a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations to the detriment of the Claimant.

 

10. Without prejudice to the burden of proof, the Claimant will refer to the following matters in support of the contention that the terms are to be assessed as unfair as at the time of the conclusion of the Agreement, and of each revision to the Standard Terms.

 

(a)The terms relating to Charges were standard terms; they would not be individually negotiated.

 

(b)The Charges were a penalty for breach of contract.

 

©The Charges exceeded the costs which the defendant could have expected to incur in dealing with late payment or returned payment.

 

(d) Accordingly the Charges were a disproportionate charge incurred by the Claimant for their failure to meet their contractual obligation and thus within the ambit of Schedule 2 (1) (e) of the Regulations and indicative of an unfair term.

 

(e) As the Defendant knew, the Charges were of subsidiary importance to the customer in the context of the Agreement as a whole and would not influence the making of the Agreement.

 

(f) As the Defendant knew, the Claimant had no means of assessing the fairness of the Charges.

 

(g) Hence, the effect of the Charges would be prejudicial to the customer who incurred them, and cause an imbalance in the relations of the parties to the Agreement by subordinating the customer’s interests to those of the Defendant in a way which was inequitable.

 

11. Without prejudice to the burden of proof, the Claimant will contend that the terms imposing the Charges are not core terms under regulation 6 of the Regulations, and will rely on the following matters:

 

(a) The assessment of fairness does not relate to terms that define the main or core subject matter of the Agreement.

 

(b) The assessment of fairness does not relate to the adequacy of the price or remuneration as against the goods or services supplied in exchange (in other words, whether or not the relevant services were value for money).

 

12. By reason of the said matters the terms were not binding under regulation 8 of the UTCCR 1999 Regulations.

 

13. The Defendant wrongly applied Charges and Interest to the Account, estimated at totalling some £ XX.XX between X/X/X and X/X/X. The defendant attaches a copy of the schedule of charges sent to the defendant on X/XX/XX.

 

 

 

The claimant’s attempts to settle the dispute:

 

 

14. On, XX/X/X, XX/X/XX and X/XX/XX, the Claimant requested repayment of the sums wrongly applied. (put details of GE’s response here)

 

 

In Conclusion:

 

15. Therefore the Claimant claims:

 

(a) Payment of the said sum of £XXX.XX plus the amount of interest accrued between XX/XX/XX(date of first ever charge) and X/XX/XX,(date of last charge), which the claimant estimates at £XX.XX. Total £XX.XX

 

(b) Interest of £XX.XX, pursuant to the County Courts Act 1984 (s69) at the rate of 8%, and claimed up to X/X/XX, and thereafter at the daily rate of £X.XX to the date of judgement or sooner payment.

 

© Court costs.

 

 

 

 

I believe that the facts stated in these particulars are true.

 

 

 

 

Dated

 

 

 

 

 

Signed

 

BAE :)

Edited by Blossomandebony
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 8 months later...

Well, I am back, I have been poorly for some time now, had a really bad few months, and as a result have not been able to do this. Can I still proceed or will I need to go back to them and tell them my intentions again? Thing is, I have just had to put another complaint into them for their shoddy work, I have just cleared my arrears, had a letter stating that I only owed them £35 yet they took almost £90 extra which is what we had been paying, so of course I queried this only to be told we still owed another £155! I was mortified, apparently its arrears on PPI??? first I have heard!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

Can I just check whether there are certain things to "look" for when trying to claim back mis-sold PPI?

 

I have a secured loan and a mortgage with the same company and both have PPI on them, I remember being told in both cases that we would not be considered for either the loan or the mortgage if we did not take it.

 

I have recently written to the mortgage department with regard to PPI as I want to cancel this, it is more than double I would pay if I took it elsewhere, am i able to just claim back what I have paid or is there more to it than this?

 

I haven't been on the forum for a while and it has all changed and I am still trying to navigate round it, any help pointing me in the right direction would be great.

 

Regards

Deli

Link to post
Share on other sites

with regard to PPI

 

i would certain use the PPI complain form on the FOS website

 

and have a read of the various 'example' case loads there too

which will outline the correct route/calc to do.

 

i pers, would do the complaint form and anSOC for each one

and fire it off to whomever you paid your premuims to

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...