Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • [URL=https://meettomy.site]Pretty Girls in your town[/URL]
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

paypal and cca's


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all,

 

after nearly having a heart attack whem i reliased how much i owed, i finally made the leap and contacted Payplan today and looks as if i will take up a DMP with them.

 

I take it payplan are a good company to deal with?

 

I have used another company (last year before i found this fourm) to cca lloyds for me and this is ongoing.

 

can any one tell me, how much do you get in the way of phone calls and demanding letters from the credit card companies and loan companies whilst setting the DMP up and after its been set up?

 

also, i was thinking about cca'ing barclaycard also, i have had a card with them since 1987.

 

I owe about £40 k, 3 cards and one loan, i am desperate to get them sorted but hubby isn't awear of the total amount outstanding and i think he will walk if he knew the final amount, so really trying to not let him know.

 

 

also when you have a DMP with payplan, can you still CCA the cards? will cca'ing the cards make the companies refuse to let you have much lower payments and not freeze the interest charges?

 

any help or advise would be good please

 

also i have heard that if you are paying a lower amount through payplan, that the card companies can and proberly will send you default letters and threaten to take you to court, if you have CCA'd them and they haven't as yet been able to produce the origional signed document, can and will they still try and take you to court?

 

or is it something that could force thier hand in trying to prove that they have the origional signed agreement?

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

also, i was thinking about cca'ing barclaycard also, i have had a card with them since 1987.

 

Don't think! CCA everyone, than think!

 

also when you have a DMP with payplan, can you still CCA the cards? will cca'ing the cards make the companies refuse to let you have much lower payments and not freeze the interest charges?

 

When talking with payplan, I asked them what shall I do when my biggest creditor does not have proper CCA's and that my intention is to stop any payments until the creditor is no more in default. Payplan said that I shall initiate a court action and get a judgment in my favor, only than I shall stop the payments.

 

Well... after that I told Payplan to take a hike. Those who think that that CCCS and Pyplan are acting in their interest are either naive or banks. The truth is, debt "charities" are paid by the banking cartel.

 

Nevertheless, for many people payplan/cccs route might be quite a good choice. Please do not let what I told you to prevent you from talking to payplan/cccs. Just be aware.

--------------------------------------------------

Yorkshire Bank ~1200£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~350£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~4000£ flexiloan CCA request sent May 2009, 'sorry, we do not have your CCA' letter received June 2009, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC ~9000£ CC CCA request sent May 2009, no response, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC - preliminary letter for about 300£ of unfair charges plus interest sent May 2009, LBA sent June 2009, N1 POC and Schedule of charges submitted July 2009

Egg - CCA, SAR, "no more calls" letter, DMP offer sent July 2009. Got a DN from Egg - wont say a word on this one until court papers are received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Winston44,

 

I agree with Readalot, you should CCA all of your creditors! If a debt is unenforceable then you will have more money available to pay your other creditors.

 

I have heard mixed reports about Payplan and setting up DMP's. They will only help if you have a minimum disposable income of £100 per month.

 

Have you considered contacting your local "Christians Against Poverty"? Although their case workers are not trained, they will refer to a central department in Bradford who will set up a savings account for you, which they will administer, to pay into on a regular basis and they will negotiate with your creditors and set up a DMP. Their case workers supply pre paid self addressed envelopes for you to send threatening letters etc to them to deal with. You don't have to be religious to access the service!

 

Unfortunately, with a DMP the creditor there is no guarantee that the creditor will freeze the interest.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well... after that I told Payplan to take a hike. Those who think that that CCCS and Pyplan are acting in their interest are either naive or banks. The truth is, debt "charities" are paid by the banking cartel.

 

 

This is mis-information. Both Payplan and CCCS are not working in a cartel in the banks at all. They are independent of the banks and work to help individuals arrange reasonable repayments. They are not there to help people challenge the enforceability of agreements as most people are happy to repay what they have borrowed. I must also add that Payplan are not a charity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sequenci,

 

I agree with you completely.

 

However, I suggest that it may be a good idea to challenge the enforceability of the agreements in any event irrespective of whether a DMP is in force or not. If any of the agreements are unenforceable then there will be a greater sum available to pay the other creditors and thereby reduce the time the DMP is in force.

 

Again, I would suggest trying Christian against Poverty for help. I went to a seminar in Chichester recently and was impressed with there service proposition which is entirely free and dependant upon donations.

 

For the record, I am a registered intermediary with Payplan in the course of my employment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sequenci,

 

I agree with you completely.

 

However, I suggest that it may be a good idea to challenge the enforceability of the agreements in any event irrespective of whether a DMP is in force or not. If any of the agreements are unenforceable then there will be a greater sum available to pay the other creditors and thereby reduce the time the DMP is in force.

 

This is certainly worth doing. I will stress that it isn't the job of any of the debt advice charities to suggest that people CCA their creditors as most people acknowledge that they have borrowed the money and wish to pay it back. This is also compounded by the fact that more and more credit agreements are going to have been taken out after April '07 which unenforceability arguments significantly more difficult.

 

Again, I would suggest trying Christian against Poverty for help. I went to a seminar in Chichester recently and was impressed with there service proposition which is entirely free and dependant upon donations.

 

I concurr, we use a lot of their materials in the day job; they are excellent.

For the record, I am a registered intermediary with Payplan in the course of my employment.

 

I work for the Money Advice Trust :)

 

Welcome to Money Advice Trust

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the record, I am a registered intermediary with Payplan in the course of my employment.

 

I was in Grantham not long ago at your offices, you guys put on a good spread :) MUCH better than Experian's LOL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

 

many thanks for your replies, i didn't think that payplan would be able to cca the card companies, but really just wondered if it would effect the DMP is i cca'd them seperatly from payplan?

 

using Christian against Poverty doesn't really look like an option as it looks as if hubby would need to be involved and if he knew the full extent, he proberly would walk, hense trying to sort it myself:eek:

 

also

also i have heard that if you are paying a lower amount through payplan, that the card companies can and proberly will send you default letters and threaten to take you to court, if you have CCA'd them and they haven't as yet been able to produce the origional signed document, can and will they still try and take you to court?

 

or is it something that could force thier hand in trying to prove that they have the origional signed agreement?

 

can any one tell me, how much do you get in the way of phone calls and demanding letters from the credit card companies and loan companies whilst setting the DMP up and after its been set up?

 

and

 

also when you have a DMP with payplan, can you still CCA the cards? will cca'ing the cards make the companies refuse to let you have much lower payments and not freeze the interest charges

 

sorry if it looks like i am repeating myself but dont think these questions have really been answered!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Winston44,

 

Using Christians against Poverty will involve home visits by their case workers so you are are right about the problems it may cause with your husband.

 

Unfortunately, a DMP does not mean that your creditors will stop contacting you by letter or telephone. However, the frequency should reduce. Have you asked your creditors to remove your telephone number from their records? similarly, a lot of creditors use ex directory numbers to phone from in which case you could contact your telephone service provider and call bar these numbers.

 

If all else fails and you are harrassed, you can always refer the creditor / dca to Trading standards. I understand that there may be a template letter available from the forum.

 

Having a DMP will not prevent you from sending CCA requests to your creditors and your creditors are under no obligation to freeze interest charges although they often do.

 

You are correct, it is my view that whilst the CCA request is outstanding, the creditor will have difficulty enforcing the debt.

 

I hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...