Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Grattan - unfair late payment charge?


LooopyLoo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4553 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

on 16th Sept I received a payment reminder from Grattan, telling me I hadn't paid my bill from my august statement so they would be adding late payment fee of £12 on to my account (to be paid by 15th sept!). I haven't ordered anything from grattan recently, so i sat on their custmer services line for about 30 minutes (0845 Grrrrrr!) and got through to the rudest cust serv person ever! It emerged that last Oct I ordered 3 magazine subscriptions on a '3 for £3' deal. (true). I paid for these immediately. However, I received a further 2 or 3 mags after the initial 3 issues as I forgot to cancel them. They decided to charge me for these in August but I never received a statement, hence the £12 late fee. I want them to refund the charge as I didn't know I owed them anything, they said I should have realised that my aug statement hadn't arrived (although I wasn't expecting one!) so I still have to pay the late fee!! I've now paid the balance of the account, £15 odd, minus the £12 late fee. Where do i stand on getting this late fee wiped??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol....... typical response from them, you have to remember that half of them will be out of work by crimbo so they have no real interest in getting this right. The ones that can still be ar**d are following the company line to save their jobs.

 

If you can hang on for a few weeks till I get my cheque I'll forward you a contact number for their head office and legal department. Fold pretty easily when it comes to the crunch.

 

Don't suppose you live in Devon do you? got loads of statements for some poor bugger down that way :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I had the same problem but had just forgotten 1 payment ( i owed about £7) and they owed me £17 in commission! In past i have received a polite reminder letter or phonecall and have always paid immediatly with an apology. This time less than 2 weeks after the missed payment i received the nasty letter with the £12 charge. I rang customer services asked to be put straight on to a supervisor who after listening knocked the charge off but even so I closed the account and wont touch them again. I know i missed the payment but over the years I always paid more than minimun and think that unless they go back to polite reminders before the charge everyone should cancel their accounts. we are only human and it is easy to forget.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 months later...

sorry if this is posted in the wrong place. i'm new!

 

I am having some problems with Grattan, I had an account with them some time ago and moved house, sent them a letter to change my address, heard nothing, repeated this 2 more times...still nothing, i checked my credit file to find a default from a company called eos solutions, after alot of waiting on the phone i found this to be the Grattan account( eos could not give me a statement of this account) So i called Grattan and asked to discuss the account and to have a statement of the account sendt to my new address. Rita at Grattan said she could not discuss the account, could not put me through to anyone in collections and that i must speak to Eos. i argued that i had given my address to them and its their fault if they did not update. I had tried. Advice please, Eos have now taken the account from the £229 to over £330. there was no reason for this debt to be sold on as i i had given Grattan my new address and asked them to send me statements so i could pay.

 

HELP

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi everyone,

I am also having problems with Grattan which I think may be caused by the new payments system, they kept sending me statements saying I was behind with my payments and everytime I paid what they asked for I woulkd get a letter saying I hadnt paid and a default payment. I tried to access my online account to check my payments and it said my status would not allow me to access the online account management facilities. I then had an email from them saying my online statement was available to view (I didnt even know they sent online statements) but when I tried to access it the same thing, your account status means you cannot access your account. So in desperation I emailed them (I object to paying for phone calls to companies that I am sending money to) I had an email back to say that because I hadnt made the required payments on time they had transfered my account to a company called EOS solutions and I should contact them. My query is that no 1 can they do that without letting me know first and no 2 if they no longer own my account how can they still be accepting my payments (the last one being made six days ago through my bank and accepted by them) I am very confused and quite angry as well and I have emailed them back asking for written confirmation of my last 4 payments.

Can anyone help or shed any light on whether their practices are legal and what I should do?

 

Many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...