Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Other case law relied upon " On other record of reasons "
    • Page 2 – document 10 and 11 – you should include the fact that it is a Law reform commission report. Best to give it its full name if you can I suggest that you move paragraph 10 up to the first position – paragraph 5 and move everything down. I think other than that – it is good to go. I suggest you don't bother to do any more drafts. Simply rearrange the paragraphs as I suggested above then the title of the documents that you are relying on in the index page. Send it off and post your final version here so that everybody can see. I'm sorry about the delay. Thanks for reminding me
    • I have recently found myself in financial difficulties and with the help of forum members in another thread regarding this, I think I can get myself sorted. My query here is how to deal with a Cifas marker that has been logged against me by one of my creditors for "evasion of payment". Admittedly yes I did get a £5000 loan with them and have not paid any payment but at the start of the year, which is when the loan landed, I realised I was going to be struggling to repay that and other debts and I contacted MCB to ask if there was any way I could extend the loan from 24 months to 36 months. I explained my situation and that I was going with a DMP and asked them if they could help me with this. They did not reply. I then emailed them again a month later explaining that my DMP was going ahead and could they confirm that the direct debit was indeed cancelled. Again, they did not reply. The DMP fell apart and so did everything else thereafter. My bank withdrew my overdraft and said I could not stay with them (I thought initially that it was because of the DMP) so I opened another account (Starling) and set up all my direct debits etc with the new bank. A month into being with the new bank, they contacted me and said they were closing my account in three months. So I started applying for other basic accounts and every single one of them either refused or revoked.  Through the help in the other thread, I requested a SAR from Cifas and discovered that I have this marker against my name for "evasion of payment". I have logged a complaint with MCB on the advice of other forum members, but my query really is do you think the marker is fair given that I did ask them for help and I did explain that I was going to be struggling financially to repay the loan over the original two years, and is there any way that I can get it removed? I fully admit that I have yet to make a payment to them and I suppose in my naivety and panic I thought if I emailed them early on they could extend the loan and help me out, but they didn't even reply  I did manage to open an account with Monzo before the marker was in place, but I am very concerned that if Monzo do what Starling did, I will have no bank account to pay my bills or get my wages paid into.  Realistically based on the information I have given here, what do you think my chances are of getting this marker removed? Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated x
    • Thank you dx, that is what I intend to do now. I have gone through all the SAR documents, a lot of which I am seeing for the first time! As per my previous post #116 letters and statements alleged to have been sent to me, as recorded on their system notes I have not received. Letters I have sent requesting information and account statements have not been recorded as being received by them, all were sent either by Recorded or Special Delivery. I have all the proof you menrtioned from my files for payments and from their SAR info for fees added. Thanks t
    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Msa V Halifax ***SETTLED IN FULL***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

Sent off Halifax S.A.R 19.07.06, recieved letter saying statements would follow but havent got them yet. I have had a look through the forums to see if there is a template letter to remind them of the time scale limitation, cant find one, i know its still early days just wondered if anyone has had this problem and what did you do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Statements have finally arrived, i added up the charges which came to over £700 (for 1 account) over the weekend, typed out my prelim letter and list of charges and sent them off this morning recorded delivery. Will see if they are any quicker at replying to this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Got a letter friday offering a settelment figure and brochure with information on banking charges. i am really happy that i am starting to see some progress and the halifax is paying me for a change! tempted to accept but i think ill take them to the cleaners. Just about to look through the forums on what to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats really good to hear Tarisa, did you claim the full amount?

 

Also am a little confused so if anyone could clear this up for me i would be grateful. i received the standard settlement offer of just over half the ammount 2 days before the 14 day deadline was up and i read under step by step instructions that there is no need to send another letter, just start the moneyclaim, am i correct in thinking that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

only just received the first offer, so still have half the battle left to fight! no there is another letter to send accepting the offer only in part payment and you will be claiming for the rest, you will find it in the library templates! good luck!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

But I would limit their response time to 7 days, no more.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks jonni2bad,

 

Halifax letter came today, just another standard reply letter i think, saying "we will not be refunding the money as you did not wish to accept it", thats funny i am sure i said i would but still persue for the full amount!

Anyway i have registered with money claim so i guess i will double check i know what i am doing and get on with that.

 

Time from starting this whole process upto now 2 months 10 days, but i am making progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post back if you need help with the Particulars

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok just to confirm and inform any confused souls

 

On MCOL "money claim online" you register, enter your details, as the person claiming you are the claimant and then enter the banks details they are the defendent.

 

Keep following the instructions step by step, as i understand you enter no under the human rights act question, and yes under the reserve the right to claim interest (if you have decided to claim your interest).

 

I then entered this as my short statement:

 

I am claiming back charges in the amount of

£xxxxx deducted from my account because i

now understand that they are unlawful at

common law. I will also be claiming back the

costs i have incurred during this process

which include the £10.00 cost for the subject access request and court fee of £80.00.

And added the total costs in the calculation boxes provided below.

I couldnt find any info on CAG site about filling in MCOL but i suppose it pretty simple to understand and fill in, this is just incase your wondering plus could a moderator or someone in the know please confirm i have done it correctly. THANKS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I then entered this as my short statement:

 

I am claiming back charges in the amount of

£xxxxx deducted from my account because i

now understand that they are unlawful at

common law. I will also be claiming back the

costs i have incurred during this process

which include the £10.00 cost for the subject access request and court fee of £80.00.

 

This is a little sparse as Particulars of Claims go. You could try this which may need a little tweaking to fit

:

Claimant has account (A/C No) with Defendant from (Date a/c opened) conducted on their standard terms and conditions. Claimant is claiming the return of (£0.00 = amount of charges claimed) taken by Defendant in charges over (X) years. The Defendant’s charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. They are also invalid under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.Para.8 and sch.2.1.e.

In the event that the charges are not a penalty they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. Defendant has declined justification of charges despite repeated requests. Claimant claims interest under Sec.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from(Date of 1st charge) to (Date of filing claim) of (£0.00 =The interest in the 8% spreadsheet calculation) and also interest at same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of (£0.00p = Amount of charges claimed x 0.00022).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i might of messed up or am just being paranoid, sent LBA off dated 24.09.06. Recevied halifax reply saying "i confirm we will not refund all the charges" on 30.09.06. I then assumed because they have clearly stated they will not be refunding me i could start my MCOL so i did and entered it yesterday, 7 days before the 14 day deadline.

All the other threads seem to be waiting the full 14 day deadline before entering it, will that cause any problems? thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you enter here?

 

Do you wish to enter Judgment by Default or by Admission? Please select one of the options below:

spacer.gif The defendant has not filed an admission or defence to my claim

(Judgment by Default)

spacer.gif

You will need to decide, how and when you want the defendant to pay. You can ask for the Judgment to be paid by instalment or in one payment.

spacer.gif The defendant admits that all the money is owed

(Judgment by Admission)

spacer.gif

If the defendant has given a new address on the form of admission to which correspondence should be sent, update the defendant's details within the following Judgment request.

 

 

Sorry for been thick, help please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in over my head!!!

 

I thought i had really done well up to this point, i was uisng the CAG site to do research and double check everything without having to ask questions every 2 seconds but now am at a loss.

 

Questions:

Once the claim has been issued on MCOL am i right in thinking that you send off the schedule of charges to Northampton County Court straight away?

 

Do i click on start under judgement in the claim menu on MCOL website, or is somthing suppose to happen first like the bank replies or you give them the fourteen days?

 

If you do click on start straight away, what is the answer to the above post?(because it is the first option you get)

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't send any copies, really don't think you need to at this point. Your MCOL claim is complete - where it now says 'issued' will change at some point over the next 19 days (the court will write to you shortly informing you of their deadline to respond). It will probably change to 'acknowledged' within this time. You need only use the default function (where is says 'start') if the Halifax miss thier deadline so don't worry about what you have asked in post #23. You really won't have to do much over the next few weeks, so sit back, give yourself a pat on the back, and don't fret!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...