Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Abbey Hardship Letter


scared001
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5328 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all

 

please can i have some help?

 

i wrote to abbey re financial hardship and they have sent me a letter today saying that as a 'goodwill' they will send me a cheque for £500 bearing in mind my charges total in excess of £8000 going back to 2001. theyve given me 14 weeks to respond.....

 

they are still going to apply charges as usual after 29 oct. i have closed my account with them, back in april when they took it upon themselves to take my JSA without permission.

 

they close the letter by saying my case remains on hold pending outcome of test case. does this mean i get £500 and thats the end of it or does it mean thats what im getting for now until the case has been resolved?

 

so has anyone experienced this or does anyone have any suggestions as to what action should i should take?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to deal with the whole case if its under hardship, as stipulated by the FOS, the payment just adds to culpability.

If you have typed right and it amounts to £8K send them a Statement of Finances proving hardship and a letter similar to below...

 

Date: XXXXXX

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

Account number: XXXXXXX

 

I refer to default charges applied to my account amounting to [insert total of charges], which I have requested you pay back before the end of the OFT test case as I am currently experiencing financial hardship.

 

I wrote to you on [insert date], making the original request [include if you have already sent a financial statement or delete and I completed a financial statement on [insert date], but I am yet to receive a satisfactory response.

 

As stated in my previous letter I am [enter full details of why you are in financial hardship and the effect is has on your life, for example are you missing mortgage payments, needing to take cash out on a credit card to pay for day to day goods] but I do not think you havetaken this into consideration when looking at my compliant.

 

I am writing to ask that you reconsider my complaint or I intend to take my case to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

I look forward for a full response to this letter within 7 days.[/font]

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, scared001.

 

I'll move this thread to the Hardship Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

they close the letter by saying my case remains on hold pending outcome of test case. does this mean i get £500 and thats the end of it or does it mean thats what im getting for now until the case has been resolved?

 

 

They will give you the £500 now, and your total amount claimed will be reduced by this amount when the 'test case' is resolved.

 

I'll have a look around this Forum, see if I can find anything similar.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a good look around this Forum, yourbank gives sound advice ;)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a smiliar stituation to mine. I received a response from Alliance and Leicester yesterday. They are offering around 10% of my claim and then they will deal with the rest once the test case is over. They have even credited my account with this amount to give me all the more reason to stop.

 

Martin Lewis says this is a common step and you should write back saying that you "acknowledge the money without prejudice" but you only accept this as a partial settlement and not and full and final settle. Say that you will continue with the claim, which includes going to the ombudsman. At this stage you can also mention how much you would be willing to accept as a settlement.

 

That's the advice from Martin Lewis when the a bank goes down this route.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

You should find a suitable letter in here, you might have to edit a bit...........

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates/139-rejecting-offers-

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a smiliar stituation to mine. I received a response from Alliance and Leicester yesterday. They are offering around 10% of my claim and then they will deal with the rest once the test case is over. They have even credited my account with this amount to give me all the more reason to stop.

 

Martin Lewis says this is a common step and you should write back saying that you "acknowledge the money without prejudice" but you only accept this as a partial settlement and not and full and final settle. Say that you will continue with the claim, which includes going to the ombudsman. At this stage you can also mention how much you would be willing to accept as a settlement.

 

That's the advice from Martin Lewis when the a bank goes down this route.

 

I don't agree with Martin Lewis and I think the Hardship Guide on MSE is unclear(yes I have had words with MSE team) because it is not correct.

The way you argue financial hardship is very simple, a lifestyle event(unemployment, loss of overtime, separation from a partner) lead to charges which took money out of your budget for priority creditors(rent, mortgage, utilities, council tax) leading to debts to these essential outgoings. Whilst you can reclaim every single charge since the account was opened, only the charges since July 2001 are counted for financial hardship purposes. You need to count the charges since the lifestyle event occurred and if that adds up to their offer then the FOS is unlikely to agree with you. If the only argument you have is that it is not 100% of the claim then you are doomed to failure on that approach.

Martin Lewis' guide is not clear enough and leads to rejections of offers unnecessarily. Not sure how many times I keep writing on the reclaims board....."Never reject a hardship offer"

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree with Martin Lewis and I think the Hardship Guide on MSE is unclear(yes I have had words with MSE team) because it is not correct.

The way you argue financial hardship is very simple, a lifestyle event(unemployment, loss of overtime, separation from a partner) lead to charges which took money out of your budget for priority creditors(rent, mortgage, utilities, council tax) leading to debts to these essential outgoings. Whilst you can reclaim every single charge since the account was opened, only the charges since July 2001 are counted for financial hardship purposes. You need to count the charges since the lifestyle event occurred and if that adds up to their offer then the FOS is unlikely to agree with you. If the only argument you have is that it is not 100% of the claim then you are doomed to failure on that approach.

Martin Lewis' guide is not clear enough and leads to rejections of offers unnecessarily. Not sure how many times I keep writing on the reclaims board....."Never reject a hardship offer"

 

I'm new to this forum but I do trust what Martin Lewis says. We'll see what response I get back. But their offer conveniently works out at 10% of my claim and does not reflect my mums change in circumstances. Plus, we are willing to risk £130 as we want the full amount or as close to that as possible. £130 isn't good enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you have read the advice here form moneysavingexpert:

 

Bank Charges Hardship: Reclaim NOW inc template letters...

 

It explains some of the common responses from the banks and yours matches this one:

 

You’re offered a refund, but not the full amount

 

Again it’ll almost certainly be a “goodwill gesture”, but the fact it’s willing to make an offer is good news – the cash till is open. Do remember this is all about negotiation. What are you willing to settle for? How much is it willing to pay out?

 

Consider going back and asking for more, both by phone, eg, saying: “You owe me £1,400, you're offering £1,000, I'll take £1,200." Then write a more formal letter, perhaps detailing the amount of priority debts you have. This can, and has, worked. Banks need to balance the ongoing costs of a claim against simply paying out.

 

If it’s not willing to pay what you’d settle for, there’s a temptation to say to yourself: “Fight the good fight and take ‘em on”. Yet it’s more important to protect your pocket. Let’s say you’re asking for £2,000 back, and are offered £1,200. Don’t think: “I’m £800 short” but that you’ve got £1,200 that was gone forever. Would this cash sort your financial burdens?

 

While it looks likely the law will be resolved in reclaimers’ favour, that’s not 100% certain, so if cash now would be valuable your ultimate decision should be a combination of whether you want the hassle of continuing versus getting the cash. Accepting a partial amount does not mean you forgo rights to the rest though. The FSA waiver has an important clause saying:

 

"if the outcome of the test case produces a result that is more favourable to the complainant, the firm must take all reasonable steps to pay any difference in the amount of compensation actually received by the complainant and that that the complainant would have been entitled if his claim has not been settled by the firm then;" Source: FSA Waiver

 

In plain English, this means if we win then you'll be able to ask for the remainder of your claim at the end of the Test Case and banks must make up the difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm new to this forum but I do trust what Martin Lewis says. We'll see what response I get back. But their offer conveniently works out at 10% of my claim and does not reflect my mums change in circumstances. Plus, we are willing to risk £130 as we want the full amount or as close to that as possible. £130 isn't good enough.

My username is NatWestStaffMember on MSE and I have worked very hard to have a full understanding of how financial hardship works. As I stated before, his hardship guide is confusing to be blunt with you.

You have to argue lifestyle event(loss of hours, unemployment, separation from a partner) lead to a drop in income leading to the inability to repay priority creditors(mortgage.rent, council tax, utilities) and then charges which lead to arrears. The charges should be current and still have the effect of taking money out of essential outgoings. You can choose the advice of Martin Lewis over mine, that's fine and dandy. I get results and he hardly posts on the forums apart from politicians letters which are meaningless.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont see why we still have to argue our case when quite cleary abbey have received the I&E form and also are well aware of my discussions with CCCS. this is money they have unlawfully taken and i intend to take every single penny back, wasnt it bad enough that they took it upon themselves to take my JSA without permission let alone charges and fees dating back 2001...its a disgrace, sorry but i feel very strongly about these bank charges and i am struggling day to day at the moment....i think that martin lewis is doing a good job also....the more readily info we have the better.... us poor people can only but fight our cause....

 

ps:did anyone else get an email from the bbc re fin hardship?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...