Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RCI Finance ccj


navy paul
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5244 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Recieved my AQ today anf have a couple of weeks to return it. Still no word from RCI.

I'm a bit concerned about any fees, i have already paid £75 to have the ruling set aside and the AQ makes reference to fees payable?

Also on the "other information" should i just list the amount of requests that i have sent to RCI for the POC and their lack of response/acknowledgment?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore the fees part, that's for RCI to pay.

 

In the "other information" box, or a seperate letter if it is lengthy, you can request all the documentation you need for your defence ( Credit Agreement, Default Notice, Notice of Assignment etc.)

 

Have a look at these links for completing Allocation Questionnaires (courtesy of 42man) -

 

Link Financial County Court Summons - N150

 

Directions for N150 or N149 Allocation questionnaire - Paul's guide to N149 & N150 AQ's

 

Allocation Questionnaire...Urgent help needed please!!! - N150

 

Court papers received- what now??!!**WON**CASE DISMISSED - N149 (with draft order for directions)

 

upto the eyeballs v CL Finance No CCA IN COURT ** Help ** - N150

 

The dreaded court claim came today... - N150

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok so now something quite strange has happened.

i returned my AQ to the court a couple of days ago and today i received a copy of a letter from RCI (original sent to court) confirming that they have no objections to the set aside. They also attached a photocopy of the original agreement showing the excess mileage charges and confirmed that the total amount owing following "re-calculation" is significantly lower than the original judgement amount ( 2/3 lower)Now i'm thinking that either they were attempting to fleece me and have now realised that they are dealing with someone who knows what they are doing legally(thank you caggers) or they have made a massive error? Now the new amount required seems justified, do i let the court know of my intentions to settle and pay RCI the amount or do i await contact from the court?

Edited by navy paul
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK so now i get a letter from the court telling me that unless RCI submit their AQ within a week the claim will be struck off?

Does this mean that RCI will have to reissue the claim again or call it a day? also does this mean that my credit history will revert backto normal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

RCI have now complied with all of the courts requirements and the couret have permitted me to file an amended defence.

Rci have not supplied a full breakdown of the costs of the original action but have sent details of an amended excess mileage charge.

As this is the only tangible figure that i have had from them do i make reference to this in my ameneded defence and settle the claim or do i need to persue any further form filling or processes?

 

Thaks

Edited by navy paul
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply supasnooper.

 

Ive attached a copy of the amended defence, hopefully rci will finally get their act together.

 

In the xxxxxx County Court Case No xxxxxxxxxx

Between:

RCI Financial (Claimant)

V

(Defendant)

Amended Defence

I, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx make this statement as my amended defence to the claim brought about by RCI Financial Ltd.

Particulars of the original claim have still not been disclosed to the defendant and the correspondence received to date from the claimant is incredibly vague despite CPR 31.14 request.

The Claimants submitted letter dated xxxxxx to the court confirms a recalculated figure of xxxxx for excess mileage, as proof of the suggested mileage was not attached I am at a loss to advise further.

The Claimant has also failed to stipulate if the recalculated figure is an amended settlement.

It is my opinion that the claimant is trying to frustrate matters in refusing to disclose the documents requested and they have ignored my CPR request for the account completely. It is submitted that the claimant taking this course of action places me at a clear disadvantage and there is no apparent reason why the claimant would seek to withhold this documentation from me.

I respectfully request the court orders full disclosure of the claimant’s particulars of claim with supporting proof and supply written confirmation of any recalculated settlement figure to the court.

I will then be in a position to file a fully particularised defence and respectfully request the courts permission to amend my defence accordingly.

I, believe the above statement to be true and factual

Signed: xxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...