Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Family Business Loan - Signed Promissory Note - SD Failed - Now a Claimform


rippedoff15
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1484 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

the SD would have simply be download by should have been served IN PERSON by a process server

or

at court they'll need to produce a statement witnessed and signed by the process server to say he was unable to serve in person for the above reasons.?

 

an SD at this stage has not been near a court

and a court will know nothing about it.

 

this is very much like the way lowells used to operate years ago by issuing SD's as a debt collection tools like confetti.

they got castigated for it.

 

the way to deal with it is in our legal section of the library.

 

worry about any wrong dates/poor service later.

just get the forms in.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Family LOan - Wife Signed Promissary Note for My Business loan - Now SD issued
  • 3 months later...

please complete this:

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the most imp thing is missing particulars of claim please, verbatim. ...minus pers ID.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Family Loan - Wife Signed Promissory Note for My Business loan - Now Statutory Demand issued

urm I wonder where the interest comes into this...a promissory note...does it state any interest?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Manxman in exile said:

I'm sorry to have to say it, but the OP hasn't really followed the advice given over the years, and they keep on disappearing for months or years, and then come back with a partial update that doesn't quite continue on from their last posts leaving unexplained gaps

:pound:

welcome to a typical cag thread...

 

dx

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

its by 4pm on day 33 whereby the date of issue is 1 in said count.

 

and just for clarity...

 

it's a civil debt, which is not a criminal matter, so to all intent and purpose there is little any bailiff, be them County Court or High Court can really do.

with civil debt their is NO RIGHT OF FORCED ENTRY. stuff in a garden might be at risk, but unless its gold plated.

 

Cars owned by the named debtors(s) could be clamped and seized, but unless they are gold plated roll-royces are of little interest to them for a debt of this magnitude.

 

as for your defence, ideally you should not mix anything with a statute barred defence.

SB defence is absolute, it either is or it isn't.

 

if there is confidence here that the promissory Note is Immaterial, then simply file SB.

 

 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

 2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 
.
If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.
.
 3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.
..
..ends..

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3.The final such payment of £125.00 was made on 1st September 2014. No subsequent payments have been made.

 

so can't be statute barred then...??

 

is the above correct? payments were being made until this date?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/01/2015 at 11:09, rippedoff15 said:

Well today we have had a letter from a solicitor informing myself & my wife that they are now intending to recover the debt,

 

 

he is asking for a mediation meeting as we are not speaking ( 6 years now ) not realistic ,

 

 

The other party paid to my business £20k which was paid directly to the business bank account

the business went into administration.

 

 

After the business went bust i myself following an illness was declared bankrupt and lost everything including our house.

 

 

They demand we sign a promissory note for the debt,

to date we have repaid over £11k

however as they are adding interest the debt claimed is now back to £20k

 

I have been repaying every month £125.00 which is all we can afford

and now they have instructed a solicitor,

therefore we are now at a point and totally unsure what we action we can take apart from filing joint bankruptcy.

 

Can anybody help in this matter

looks like you were paying them..not sb'd

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Family Business Loan - Signed Promissory Note - SD Failed - Now a Claimform

forget any paperwork…enforceable or not...immaterial ... if they cannot PROVE you have made payments within 6yrs from the claimform date, that will allow your SB defence to win hands down.., and nothing else they come up with will matter, not even the note..

 

it's for a claimant to prove a debt is NOT SB'd, not for a defendant to prove it IS.

 

i'm a bit concerned if you read from post 1 again (which is all the info WE have to go by) you appear twice , at the relevant time or within it (6yrs) , to have been making current payments.

 

go read, p'haps it might jog your memory then check your data again...

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will bet this payment was made under duress?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...