Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Certificated Bailiffs name is not registered


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I have been visited twice by a bailiff and they have charged me £50 on each visit. Each visit was within 24hrs. I was out both times. I have looked at the name printed on the letters and then tried to find out whether they are registered. However, his name doesn't seem to be listed on the on-line court cerificated bailiff data base. Is this the normal trend? Or is this a con by the bailiff. The charges seem extreme £50 for a letter posted through the door X 2 in 24 hours. Banks cannot get away with their charges so why should they? They haven't been back since, and also the letter seems tricky as in BOLD print it states "Any arrangement to pay by instalments is made subject to our bailiff calling to your property and completing the relevant paperwork( this will incur a statutory fee) AND you making an immediate payment"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello lets fight bailiffs, thanks for your reply. The debt is for council tax arrears from last year. They called last month. The company is Jacobs and the letter says NOTICE OF ATTENDANCE TO SEIZE GOODS. The letter says " TAKE NOTICE we are in possession of a Liability Order issued by the Magistrates Court and have today attended your property to seize goods for the above debt and costs."

There is no name of the court or evidence of court orders.

I have tried contacting the council however they say I have to deal with the bailiffs and not them. I have no intention of contacting the bailiffs. I want to pay but ther council will not deal with me directly and I don't have the total amount payable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how effective this is but if you have online banking you can set up a one off payment to the council or go into your bank and try and get them to set it up. That way the money gets credited to your Council Tax account and the council can't decline acceptance of it. You will need your council tax account number and the bank account number and sort code of the council account. This maybe found on the forms they provide with payment details or available on the council web site, or someone on here may know if they are from your area.

 

But if this is a court appointed baliff and there has been a court case, it is probably not a good idea to ignore them. You should be able to go to the court and pay the money there directly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you need to talk to your council again and tell them you have never received a court order and ask them what court it was held at and what date was the order made against you and if you have never received a court order then you need to get in contact with the court and inform them you need to isue a statutory declaration to the court as you have never had any notice to attend or order of judgment and this will hand the whole thing back into the hands of the council and rid any fees or costs to date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you need to talk to your council again and tell them you have never received a court order and ask them what court it was held at and what date was the order made against you and if you have never received a court order then you need to get in contact with the court and inform them you need to isue a statutory declaration to the court as you have never had any notice to attend or order of judgment and this will hand the whole thing back into the hands of the council and rid any fees or costs to date.

 

There isn't much point in doing that if the CT is owed. Don't complicate it, just refer back to the council and refuse to pay the bailiffs. You don't owe them anything. The council is your creditor and has a duty to accept your payment proposal. You need to speak to a senior person instead of one of their muppets. Be polite but firm and they will call the bulldogs off.

Edited by Crapstone
Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't much point in doing that if the CT is owed. Don't complicate it, just refer back to the council and refuse to pay the bailiffs. You don't owe them anything. The council is your creditor and has a duty to accept your payment proposal. You need to speak to a senior person instead of one of their muppets. Be polite but firm and they will call the bulldogs off.

 

I am sorry but this information is not right.

 

First the DEBTOR cannot refer back to the council. It is for the BAILIFF to do this !!

 

The council have obtained a Liability Order and Statutory regulations laid down by Parliament provide that this must be enforced by a Certificated Bailiff.

 

Crucially, and this is vitally important.............Any money paid under Laibility Order MUST first be applied to discharge the bailiff fees!! What this means is that if you do pay the council direct then the council is DUTY BOUND to send part of you bailiff to the bailiff co to repay their charges!!!

 

PS: On the matter of the charges applied by Jacobs of £50 for EACH VISIT. This is WRONG. A first visit fee can ONLY be £24.50 for "attending to levy where no levy was made" and a second such visit can be charged at £18.00.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry but this information is not right.

 

First the DEBTOR cannot refer back to the council. It is for the BAILIFF to do this !!

 

The council have obtained a Liability Order and Statutory regulations laid down by Parliament provide that this must be enforced by a Certificated Bailiff.

 

Crucially, and this is vitally important.............Any money paid under Laibility Order MUST first be applied to discharge the bailiff fees!! What this means is that if you do pay the council direct then the council is DUTY BOUND to send part of you bailiff to the bailiff co to repay their charges!!!

 

It must just be me that it works for then. I've never paid a penny in baliffs fees or for court costs. The council needs a push but they are quite capable of agreeing to take payments directly and they usually do if you agree to set up a DD.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the council can take a payment but the bailiff fee is still due and more often than not the bailiff will still levy on the fees as it is part of the ORDER so they are payable one way or another by the debter. the council can't rid any bailiff fees only the court can.

 

The bailiffs I had were private and not court appointed ( Bristow & Sutor). Each case varies depending on your LA and how much you argue. I've found my own LA to be reasonable and they easily came to an agreement without the bailiffs being involved or paid. Their intentions are to get as much money as they can and they know what could be going towards council tax or business rates is wasted if it's to pay fees or costs. It also doesn't look too good on their overall recovery figures v expenditure.

 

The behaviour of the bailiffs can also be called into question and LA's are not fond of complaints or SAR's. In my region I've dealt with private bailiffs and LA's for years and I haven't had an outcome that went other than in favour of the debtor and an agreement made to pay or the case dropped ( business rates).

 

A bailiff can only levy on something they can touch and if you don't let them they have no option but to go away. When the bailiffs fail the LA has to use more costly and riskier enforcement tactics, so it's far better for them to agree and get something rather than nothing.

Edited by Crapstone
Link to post
Share on other sites

with council tax it is not the same as a debt from say a phone company and just because it is B&S they still collect on order of the couny court.

the law is also not the same as with council tax they can force entry if you refuse them and can also end up with a prison sentense fact because CT will end up as an arrest warent.

but there are councils that will help you i was talking to a manager for a council legal team on wednesday and they are the same he tells me all his staff are advised to take any money offered and also informed me that if i hear of any staff not accepting a payment he will deal with it.

 

and to answer the last question a magestrates bailiff has 6 months to registure so he could be quite new to the job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...