Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3987 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

After having to deal with a supposed HCEO I find he is not on any published list. Therefore I have to assume it is someone acting on behalf of the HCEO.

 

The question is therefore what would his title be? Surely if he claimed he was an HCEO he is misrepresenting himself? If he is acting on someones behalf what qualifications or registrations should he hold?

 

Confusion reigns.

 

PT


Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very doubtful that a HCEO will ever knock on your door it i a field officer working on his behalf they all say they are HCEOs it makes them feel big some how, i have a case going on now and that is one thing I intend to bring up.

just to add you usualy need half a brain to have qualifications if they did they would not be in this trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Thebailiff

There is no law stopping an ASSSISTANT high court enforcement officer from identifiying himself as "hi, im mr ....., im a high court enforcement officer, and calling with regards to......" its one small word at the end of the day. they have the smae powers as the HCEO so what the problem.

 

and to be honest if it was ever brought up, its ones word against another and not something that would get you anywhere in court. It would just make you look petty.

 

Now, someone calling themselves an enforcement officer for the high court would land himself in a world of dog poo if it was proved he said that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Thebailiff

And most HCEO and their assistant are very brainy chaps. ALL HCEO have a law degree or passed simillar test to become an HCEO and all assistants have to attend courses throughout the year to deal with all aspects of the job. Daily, they deal will b/ruptcy, insolvancy, fraud and a host of other things that need a quick and robust brain to deal with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no law stopping an ASSSISTANT high court enforcement officer from identifiying himself as "hi, im mr ....., im a high court enforcement officer, and calling with regards to......" its one small word at the end of the day. they have the smae powers as the HCEO so what the problem.

 

and to be honest if it was ever brought up, its ones word against another and not something that would get you anywhere in court. It would just make you look petty.

 

Now, someone calling themselves an enforcement officer for the high court would land himself in a world of dog poo if it was proved he said that.

 

We will see

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Thebailiff
We will see

 

What was said to you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A field officer has been ordered to attend court to answer to his actions and one of them was telling me he was a HCEO and worked for the high court. but said it in a police station on cctv with sound so, Oops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Thebailiff

yep you have him over a barrel but the barrel can easly roll away. if a judge decides to see the lack of Assistant as petty and that technically he does work for the high court, and was not really lieing but stating what he thought was right, then he wont be in trouble and you might get a reduced debt. its a 50/50 one really. Good luck with it though. he has twisted the truth and should be held accountable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...