Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hi all can anyone help with Welcome finance ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Loan amount £7000 to be repaid over 5 years .

Initial charge for loan £3000 .

Monthly repayments £280 .

Payments to date £2800 .

Current outstanding balance £9000 .

 

I have just recieved my first annual statement and it seems i am paying £280 a month but £180 of that is being deducted in charges so only £100 monthly is subtracted from loan .

 

Surely this can't be right , i have never missed or been late paying but i am reluctant to contact Welcome as the loan is secured on my house .

 

I would be very grateful for any advice as to what i should do ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, minus-millions.

 

I'll move this thread to the Welcome Finance Forum :)

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Minus,

 

my suggestion is, if you are able to scan your agreement and the statement removing all personal info and that way people can see what the charges are for and work out if there is anything wrong with the contract or the charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have scanned my letters into com but how do i post them on here ?

 

 

I think the way the guys suggest doing it is to get a photobucket account and copy them to that then post on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok please see below the only 3 letters i have from Welcome Finance that relate to me personally , the first is the offer i accepted , the second a copy of the agreement i recieved after i had agreed , and the third this years only statement which causes me alarm .

 

 

http://i999.photobucket.com/albums/af119/minus-millions/TheOffer.jpg

 

http://i999.photobucket.com/albums/af119/minus-millions/Agreement.jpg

 

http://i999.photobucket.com/albums/af119/minus-millions/AnnualStatement.jpg

Edited by minus-millions
Link to post
Share on other sites

Minus, the £180 a month isn't a charge but the interest on the loan. Welcome are charging you 22.20% per annum according to the statement - that works out at roughly 1.85% a month. So, after your payment, the balance is £9843.43 and 1.85% of that is around £184. As the balance goes down, the amount you pay in 'capitalisation/interest' will decrease so 1.85% of £8900 is £165 or so.

 

You may find this link useful -

 

Excel functions for calculating loan repayments

 

I notice in your agreement that you're paying PPI, though. Get this cancelled immediately, even if you do nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had probloms with about 5 yrs ago if you miss a payment you will be taking to court well i missed a payment and won the court case due to not contacting for change of d/d though bank the judge throw the case out on reading the statement from my bank /and my self he advise w/f to closed my acct as i had being overpaying them advice pay off loan douggie company lots of luck oh yes judge awarded me £1500 cost

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you get the PPI removed you need to ensure they restructure your loan - so the monthly payments reduce not that they take it off the back i.e. payments stay the same but you pay X number of months less.

 

Remember RESTRUCTURE not REWRITE - do not sign a new loan agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have to think about restucture , if i continued to pay £280 monthly once PPI was removed the loan would be settled in 2.5 years rather than 5 years , surely this would allow me to avoid considerable interest ?

 

I would need legal representation to go to court that doesn't come cheap !

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - if they don't restructure you are still paying interest as remember the PPI is front loaded.

 

and why do you say you need legal representation there are plenty of people that do it themselves - me being one of them. Eveything I have learned I have learned on here and using the internet.

 

Anyway as i have said court is a long way off and you are speculating ahead of the game - first you need to send the letter to reclaim PPI. You can assess your options when you get a response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Re: Agreement Number

 

I purchased the above policies from you in connection with the loans referenced above.

 

I believe that I was miss-sold these policies for the reason(s) given below, and wish you to investigate my complaint according to your normal complaint procedures.

--------------------------------------

Despite it being explicitly required under the rules of the Financial Services Authority (FSA) the following terms of service were not met :-

 

1, At no time did Welcome Finance ask about existing insurance cover .

2, At no time did Welcome Finance advise the PPI was optional .

3, Welcome Finance did not comply with disclosure rules as they did not disclose the

amount of interest that is payable on the premium .

4, Welcome Finance failed to explain or bring attention to the exclusions and

Limitations of the policy .

-------------------------------------

I personally was not able to make an informed decision as a result of Welcome Finance failing to act within the rules explicitly required by the FSA .

To further underline this I had at the time of application an existing insurance policy that offers far greater cover than your own , this policy is a requirement of my mortgage and it seems reasonable to assume that Welcome while acting as an insurance broker and being aware of the mortgage should have suspected this and questioned the need for PPI of their own accord .

 

Of course I am now aware that your sales advisors receive commission upon the sale of insurance products and therefore their actions cannot be impartial. This should have been made clear to myself at the time of the insurance being sold.

 

Please now investigate my complaint within the eight weeks allowed to you. I expect that you will uphold my complaint and refund all premiums paid plus both statutory and compound interest and compensation . I would expect the loan to be restructured to take into account these changes but will view any attempt to rewrite the loan as grounds to forward my complaint to the Ombudsman .

 

I am advised because i dealt solely with Welcome Finance when the loan and insurance was approved that Welcome Finance is responsible for any third parties involved .

 

If I have not received a satisfactory response within 8 weeks I will contact the ombudsman who is already dealing with an unrelated complaint (fsa number *****) on my behalf to discuss court proceedings .

 

Do you think this letter covers everything or does it need altered again ? Comments please .

Edited by minus-millions
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...