Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My autistic son brought a van from a private seller. ( there was 5 other cars on his drive and another van, plus loads of machanic tools in his hallway,  so he probably is a unofficial dealer).  He gave the van a once over, he checked for any warning lights that might be on, there was none. He checked underneath for any rust etc, it all looked fine. The body was rough, but you'd expect that for the age of the van.  He got his brothers machanic to give it a pre mot check, as the van was old so he expected it to have a few problems. The van is a deathtrap, the seller had blacked out all the warning lights that were on the dash,  and I mean all.  He had also painted some kind of black stuff on the underside, to hide all the damage there.   My son drove it for over 2 hours to get it home. The machanic said he's surprised my son is still alive. Iv asked the seller for a refund and for him to have the van back, but he is refusing. Is there anything we can do.
    • First of all it sounds as if your retailer is very decent and very responsible. This itself is unusual in these kinds of circumstances and I think we need to bear this in mind. The guarantee is not particularly relevant and in fact the dealer had a statutory duty to exercise a certain responsibility for your computer – probably for several years as their obligation under the consumer rights act. The dealer may not have known this and it simply acting out of a sense of moral responsibility and that is even more noteworthy. You've already suggested earlier that you didn't really want to cause problems for your retailer. I think that you will need the help of your retailer as well in order to get information and evidence. I suggest that you proceed against DPD – but before you do that – I suggest that you have a discussion with the retailer. Tell them that this is what you are going to be doing and you would like to have a copy of anything they have which relates to the special instructions which apparently your dealer has already informed you about in relation to where item should be left. Secondly, maybe you should tell your dealer about this site and also about this thread. I can imagine like many dealers who are frequently sending items by means of couriers, they have had things go missing. Tell them that we will be very happy to help them recover money for lost or damaged or stolen items – and that is regardless of whether or not they have purchased insurance. Apart from being very pleased to help your dealer recover items which have been lost by irresponsible parcel delivery companies, I think we need to encourage the complicity between you and them so they will be pleased to support you in your claim against DPD. It will be helpful if you can get a copy of the instructions that you have referred to above, and also if you can get some written evidence of your own instruction that your laptop should be left in a safe place. Have you done the reading on this sub- forum? You will need to do lots of reading of many of the similar stories on this sub- forum. They won't necessarily be against DPD but the principles will broadly be the same. Also read the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum in order to understand many of the principles involved. Getting your money back but be quick – but your chances of success are better than 90% that you can bank on it taking anything up to a year. Have you got anything in writing from DPD either refusing you or telling you that they won't discuss with you?  
    • Thank you for telling us the text of the letter you had from the police. As we don't seem to have come across this before, it would be really useful for us to see the original please. HB
    • Pasco has recalled 104,000 packs of sliced bread after rat remains were found in at least two packs.View the full article
    • UPDATE I went rooting through an old box of paperwork I have and I've found the original Default Notice. It is dated **/**/201*, however.. The copy of the Default Notice that they sent with the LBC has a completely different date on it 😮 Can they issue 2 default notices for the same debt? Where they have changed the date on the copy, they have also changed the amount owed through failed payments and how much is required to be paid by a certain date. In addition, they sent (with the 1st LBC) a copy of the termination of the agreement, which I cannot find the original. However, the termination date is 3 days after the date given on the (doctored) Default Notice, by which monies are to be paid by. So, they gave until the 'x' date to pay the arrears, then terminated the agreement 3 days later. I bet a dollar to a dime they've doctored the termination date also.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Argyle V Barclays


argyle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6317 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All.

Just would like to start saying what a great forum this is and how very supportive to each other everyone here is, will probably need your support in the time ahead.

Hopefully your support in the unknown time ahead will get my nerves through my claim to the end.

 

This is my first post and though i have been following other people's cases closely and reading the faq's this is the first time i actually feel ready to take on Barclays.

I do have a couple of questions before i start and was wondering if anyone could advise me.

 

Firstly i have setup a parachute account and have statements received for the last 6 years, which i have checked over and highlighted all those unfair charges.

 

My first question is do i need to send the DPA letter or can i start straight with the letter for approach for payment seeing the bank has sent my statements, with my calculations enclosed with the letter?

I have decided with the wife that i will not persue the interest charges on our account as i feel this to be adequate fees to cover Barclays expenses and all i require is the payment of those £20,£25 & £30 charges back.

 

Finally this came about after a conversation with a customer advisor from Barclays, after requesting my statements on the phone he advised that i send the letter for refund of charges to the Leicester Branch :o , must admit his remarks knocked me out of step for few seconds until i composed myself again and politely replied that the request was for my records only and that he was wrong to presume why i wanted our statements ;) .So my 2nd question is will the Leicester Branch be ok to send my letter to or am i being setup?

 

Thankyou all in advance of any replies and support.

 

Argyle:)

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays Bank PLC

Leicester

LE87 2BB

This is Barclays central processing, so no it wasn't a set up.

 

If you have your statements and know all your charges you can go straight to the prelim letter. V. wise re: claiming charges interest, it's a minefield.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Argyle

 

Just to say that I have sent all my correspondence to leicester.

 

Glad that you have all your satements as it does save time.When you send your lba keep a hard copy and put it in a seperate file, also send all your letters recorded/special delivery.I have done this with all my letters inc Abbey ( see thread ).

 

Anyway the best of luck and start thinking about that holiday :D :D :D

 

Andtroy

N1 forms delivered to court for Barclays

50% rejection letter sent to DLA

( Abbey )

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Comrades.

Just an update for you all.

Received a letter from Barclays today goes as follows.

 

Dear Argyle.

We are sorry you have had to contact us about the level of service you have received from Barclays.

Thankyou for taking the time and trouble to do so.

We are looking into your concerns and will let you have an answer or update as quickly as possible(Yeah right what does Barclays know about the word quick), but no later than 12th September.(Thats more than the 14 days i gave them so they obviously never read my letter). In the meantime if you wish to contact us to discuss this matter further please call us.....BLAH BLAH BLAH.

 

As you all will see a standard letter as expected C'mon Barclays get with the program Pay up & at least change your responses so we as customers feel different and appreciated.

Well just to let you know looks like they will be getting my LBA before they reply properly to my premliminary letter.

 

Keep up the fight comrades.

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Comrades.

Just to bring you all upto date with my situation.

Sent preliminary letter on the 14th August had the usual reply, so i waited 14 days and sent the LBA on the 30th August.

Today (5th Sept) received a reply from Lawrence White offering me 50% of my claim.

 

Must admit i am a little set back at the offer and wondering what my next step should be.

I know i should reject the offer and then submit my claim to moneyclaim when the LBA runs out however "Wifey" is worried that should i reject the claim we could end up with nothing..

Can somebody give me a pep talk and some further information regarding the length of time from submitting a claim with moneyclaim to the point of payday from Barclays, what i mean is could i be waiting for Barclays to pay up this side of Christmas or will it be into 2007???

 

I must admit now am getting to the sticky bits i.e court stuff i am getting a little nervous probably because i feel i will stuff up the claim if and when i come to doing it.

Some real advice from those of you who have gone this far and further would be very helpful, also is it normal for me to feel this apprehensive???

 

Thanks in advance for your help "peeps"

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Argyle

 

Firstly you have to convince YOH that she is wrong to think that you will end up with nothing. I have not yet come across anyone on this site who has got to the Court stage and got nothing, or in other words lost the case.

 

It will take time, especially with Barclays, as they seem to have a policy of procrastinating right down to the wire, and then settling in full within days of the date set for the hearing. All the banks are panic stricken about appearing in court and defending their actions which they all know to be unlawful.

 

Also if you look at all the different banks that are named on the site, you will see that there are over 14000 different threads running, (and that is just for this site, I know of 2 other sites that are operating in the same way). Now obviously not all these will progress to the Court stage, but the majority probably will, and this must have an effect on the normal operation of the court system. This means that court dates are pushed further and further into the future. So you will probably find that if you are at the initial stages, and file your claim, say mid September, you may not get a court date until end of 2006 or early 2007

 

So my advice would be, (if you are prepared to wait), to reject the 50% offer, or rather accept it, making it clear that you intend to claim the balance, and then issue proceedings, according to your own timetable.

 

Also it is worth reading through some of the other threads, especially ones with a lot of posts, as many of them reproduce the correspondence sent and received, and also the details they entered on the N1 form and Allocation Questionnaires. And there are all the templates and guidance notes in the Bank Templates Library. All this info should help you put your case effectively,

 

Good luck

Preliminary Letter sent to Woolwich 05/06

LBA sent 19/06

Court claim filed 04/07 : Total £824.75

Acknowledgement of Service 27/07

Defence received 08/08

AQ filed 11/08

Barclays AQ filed 05/09

Hearing date 20/12

SETTLED IN FULL £840.49: 14/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your support Essjaysea.

After reading your post and discussing the issue regarding to rejecting Barclays offer with the MOH, i have decided to go for it.

Therefore Saturday 9th sent the rejection letter off.

Now on Friday(probably unless Barclays settle LOL) i have to start my claim through Mcol can anyone tell me if the following (Particulars of claim - - hard copy version )in the bank letters templates is what i have to copy onto my claim?

Just want to makesure i start properly.

Also am i right in thinking Barclays have to acknowledge my claim in 14 days and if they don't i win by default or do i win by default after 28 days if they don't submit a defence?

I assume the Particulars of claim - - hard copy version is the correct wording to put on my claim and i just need to edit the particulars.

Would be grateful if someone could give me some further reassurance and guidance.

 

Thanks "Peeps"

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of claim - - hard copy version This is a version only suitable for filing with form N1. MCOL is much more limited for space.

 

This should fit:

 

Claimant has account (A/C No) with Defendant from (Date a/c opened)conducted on their standard terms and conditions. Claimant is claiming the return of (£0.00 = amount of charges claimed) taken by Defendant in charges over (X) years. The Defendant's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. They are also invalid under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.Para.8 and sch.2.1.e.

In the event that the charges are not a penalty they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. Defendant has declined justification of charges despite repeated requests. Claimant claims interest under Sec.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from(Date of 1st charge) to (Date of filing claim) of (£0.00 =The interest in the 8% spreadsheet calculation) and also interest at same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of (£0.00p = Amount of charges claimed x 0.00022).

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou very much Michael.

That was the info i was looking for to copy onto my claim,very much appreciated.

 

Final question, now am i right on the 14 day and 28 day issues regarding acknowledgement and defending?

 

Thanks

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All.

Just an update.

Received letter (13th Sept) from Barclays regarding my rejection letter to their goodwill gesture of 50%.

They basically have said that they will not increase the offer and they also stress this offer is a full and final settlement seems to be the same reply that other posts have had.

So it appears that Barclays want to do this the hard and more costly way.

So Friday i will start my Moneyclaim as that is when my LBA runs out.

 

Thankyou to you all who have helped me get this far.

Will keep you posted.

 

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kburch.

 

LBA stands for Letter Before Action.

This is the letter you need to send when the 14 days is up for your preliminary letter.

Should find it here with the following link.http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-letter-before-action-consumer.html

 

Good Luck.

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You

 

I ahve read through the LBA and some doesnt apply and also i dont have an amountthat i have been charged over the last 6 years ( though i am looking toward a 4000 figure) Do i need to request this from Barclays first and can i edit the LBA as they did answer my initial letter .

 

Sorry to be a pain but bit confusing:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kburch.

Sounds like your going the wrong way about things.

If you read the FAQ's there is a set and proven way of starting this.

You will need your statements and a figure for all the charges incurred over the 6 years.

In your premlimary letter you should have requested this total.

After 14 days the next stage would be your LBA.

You might then get a letter offering a sum as full settlement of which i rejected on the 9th, Barclays will then send you a further reply like i received today.

After the 14 days has passed since you sent the LBA you will need to submit a claim.

Some of the parts in the LBA did not apply to me either, just edit the template and adapt it to your circumstances.

You will need your statements with the highlighted charges for possible court date and for your claim when you submit it.

If you read from my first post you should have an idea of what u need to do.

 

Argyle.:)

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All.

 

Lba time is up.

I need to submit my moneyclaim asap.

Can somebody tell me which address i should get Mcol to send the documents to i have been using the Leicester address to date but i did read somewhere that one should use the London address.

Could someone please advise me.

Thankyou.

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Michael.

When i get my claim number should i inform anyone from the site?

In the middle of doing this MCOL now would like to get it done tonight.

Thanks

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

MCOL Submitted.

Fingers crossed now i can relax a little for a bit (i think????)

 

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Err!!

 

Hi All.

Is this normal?

My Mcol claim has been issued to Barclays on the 18th and i have just checked my status and it now says claim acknowledged 20th.

I thought Barclays left it late to acknowledge???

Do you actually think they have caught up with the claims?

And finally is an early acknowledgement Good News???

 

thanks for any comments "peeps"

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all normall - it means they've got the claim. In 14 days or so you should expect them to tell you that they plan to defend and then in 28 days (from the date of service - which is 7 (I think or 5?) days after you submitted your claim) they have to defend, which they normally do at the very last minute.

 

They'll do everything they can to bore us into giving up ... but we know we won't!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi All.

 

Just an update for you on my progress.

Barclays true to form submitted their defence on the last day possible(28th day).

So should get my AQ shortly.

So any newbie's reading this thread and worried about what happens next watch this space.

Barclays are fast becoming my Ex bank with their lack of customer care.

I have noted that Barclays have yet to step into a court maybe I could be the first to see them there.

 

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All.

 

Received my allocation questionaire and Barclays laughable:lol: defence which follows.

 

1. The particulars of the claim do not provide details or particulars of the precise charges alledged to have been unlawful, or the date thereof. To the extent it is alledged that the Claimant incurred bank charges on his account for unauthorised borrowings (where unpaid fees for returned cheques, "Paid refferal fees" or any other such fees), the Defendant puts the claimant to strict proof of each charge and date thereof.

2, The defendents standard terms and conditions give the claimant a fair and transparent view of those terms and the charges applicable for unauthorised borrowings (including where the account is overdrawn without an overdraft limit or where the claimant exceeds his authorised overdraft limit)

3. If and to the extent it is the Claimants case that the failure to make necessary payments and / or failure to remain within authorised overdraft limit, failure to arrange an overdraft limit constituted a breach of terms applying to the account and that the contractual entitlement to debit charges from the claimant account constitutes a liquidated damage cause, the same is denied. The charges constitute payments the claimant agreed to make by reason of the terms and conditions of his/her account and were consideration for the defendant advancing credit to the claimant, which the defendant was under no obligation to advance. The defendant was entitlted to impose such charges and interest when the claimant incurred the overdraft.

4. Accordingly, it is denied that legal principles relating to liquidated damages clauses and penalty charges are relevant or application to the facts set out above. Further or alternativly it is denied that any such charges constitiute unlawful penalty charges or are in breach of the unfair terms in consumer contracts regulations 1999 (particularly but without limitation to, paragraph 1(e) of schedule 2, or are in breach of the unfair (contracts) terms act 1977 (or any other provision)

5. Therefore, it is denied that the charges were unlawfully debited from the account

6. If and to the extent the claimant incurred charges on his account, this was caused by the claimant having gone into overdraft without having agreed to with the defendant and authorised facility or to increase the overdraft limit and his failure to make payments to bring the account balance back into its credit limit.

7. It is averred that the said charges and interest are and remain lawful and enforecable and that the defendant was entitled to debit the same. Accordingly, the claimant is not entitled to a declaration by the court as to the enforeceability of the said charges.

8. The defendant denies that it is liable to the claimant for the sums claimed and interest as pleaded by the claimant or at all. In the alternative, which is denied, if the said charges asserted by the claimant to have been applied to the account prior to 18th September 2000 would not be recoverable for the reason of exhaustion of time in bringing contractual claims from the date of the accrual, pursuant to the limitation act 1980.

9. In the alternative, and without prejudice to paragraph 6, if (which denied) the said charges and interest or any part thereof are unlawful or unenforceable as alleged by the claimant or at all, the Defendant has nonetheless suffered loss and damage as a concequence of the claimants breach of contract in allowing the account to go into unauthourised overdraft.Accordingly,in the event the defendant is unable to rely on its express entitlement to enforce the charges as set out in paragraph 2,3 above it will seek to recover to the extent necessary such loss and damage as it actually suffered, which will not necessarily be limited to the value of the said charges, and the defendant seeks to set off such sums against any liability owed hereunder to the claimant.

 

 

It does look like this is a standard defence of Barclays.

I do have some questions for you all.

 

1. when i fill in my AQ should i send an updated schedule of charges to the court?

2. Also i assume that i should send a copy of my charges to Barclays litigation offices?

3. Finally is it too early to send my court bundle or do i await the court date to send my court bundle?

 

Thankyou all in advance.

Argyle.:-)

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...