Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just noted that in Section 4 of the ebay powered by packlink T&Cs, there is a link to a list of webpages for each Transport Agency including Evri. When clicking on this, it redirects to Evri's send terms and conditions, which says: Our contract with you When you send a parcel with us, you enter into a contract with Evri. These terms and conditions set out your responsibilities and our service commitments to you, along with some legal bits about our liability and how you will be compensated in the unlikely event that things go wrong. Link to Evri send T&Cs: https://www.evri.com/terms-and-conditions the extract highlighted in bold above is pertinent as in Evri's own T&Cs, by sending a parcel with Evri, the sender and Evri have entered into a contract. Screenshot of the above extract attached. Screenshot_20240524_030834_Chrome.pdf
    • Hi, Evri provided a copy of the Ebay powered by Packlink T&Cs in their WS/Court bundle - this is already uploaded in post #246 yesterday. I copy and pasted the actual wording of clauses 3b and 3c from there into my post #246. see points 3b and 3c in Section 3 (General) through this link to the T&Cs:  https://support-ebay.packlink.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360004768420-eBay-Delivery-Powered-by-Packlink-Terms-and-Conditions#h_01HFXQJBTB441YZGPB7CQP9KFV Screenshot attached below. I cant answer why its not been picked up before. In my opinion, this is called Ebay powered by packlink T&Cs so it could be intepreted to mean Ebay and Packlink's T&Cs rather than Packlink and the delivery couriers T&Cs. In regards to seeing Evri/Packlink's entire contract in original form, in my WS, Evri has been invited to provide this. They have not provided the contract in their WS/court bundle. Screenshot_20240524_024259_Chrome.pdf
    • yes, and he has since emailed them to say he wants it done with a hearing
    • Do I take it that you had already informed the court that you wanted the case settled on the papers rather than by way of a hearing before you came here and told us?
    • This is a very important find. I don't understand why nobody has picked up on this before. It's a shame that you have only just found it but please will you get a screenshot and also give us a link to the page which contains this and if possible a link to the actual passage. This makes a huge difference because if this is right that the third party actually has a direct contract with the courier company then they can rely on their consumer rights rather than commercial rights. Also as you seem to have pointed out, even if  their commercial contract does exclude third-party rights, the clause that you have found on the eBay site directly contradicts that And this should be pointed out to the judge.  Please will you screenshot the passage. Give us a link and then stand by for a response later on today. We will have to send this additional piece of information to the court and don't worry we will manage to do it before the 4:00 pm deadline. And in any event, you will certainly want to see the entire contract in original form and receive clarification as to when their third-party exclusion close was included in it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£50k CC/loan debt and job loss


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5412 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hiya,

 

read this about the egg agreements:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/188093-egg-credit-agreements-what.html

 

the others that have snet the t and c's you can send the letter in post#22.

 

and if you are happy to go the cpr route then yes. using this was will at least make them show if they do have a valid cca or not

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

and if you are happy to go the cpr route then yes. using this was will at least make them show if they do have a valid cca or not

 

 

Ida, please can you explain what you mean by this? I have read some of PT's CPR thread but I'm a bit confused. If I've already CCA'd them can you then ask for the the CCA via CPR as well?

 

Also what do you recommend I send the ones that haven't sent a CCA?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya,

 

ok, you can request a cca freom any of your creditors but there are some loopholes with this and they could keep providing you an appliaction form saying that is the agreement, if they take you to court then they would need to produce the original agreement.

 

using cpr this is basically forcing their hand by going through the stages then actually applying for the court for the cvourt to tell them to produce one so if they do have one at this stage you would know for deffinate rather than sending account in dipute letters back and forth.

 

 

and yes you can ask both ways

 

let me know if i have explained it better?

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Ida that makes a lot of sense.

 

I've been reading a lot of egg threads and I keep finding out about debts passed to DCAs then back to egg then to other DCAs then back to egg and so on!

 

After reading the first post in PT's CPR thread above I thought I'd messed up as I'd asked for the CCA under CCA act.

 

In a nutshell - If I send letter from post 22 and then don't get an enforcable CCA I should use the CPR route?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anybody take a look at my natwest CCA and let me know where I stand?

 

I think there may be a problem with the split loan? and also it's non cancellable (I think that's a problem as well?) But is it unenforceable?

 

They sent me some standard terms and a card carrier for my credit card, hopefully they have'nt got the original!!

 

Thanks

http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...oan-cca-p1.jpg

 

http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...oan-cca-p2.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

are the two links front and back?

 

 

the repayment of your loan would come under restricted use:

 

11.—(I) A restricted-use credit agreement is a regulated consumer credit agreement—

(a) to finance a transaction between the debtor and the creditor, whether forming

part of that agreement or not, or

(b) to finance a transaction between the debtor and a person (the " supplier") other

than the creditor, or

© to refinance any existing indebtedness of the debtor's, whether to the creditor or

another person,

and " restricted-use credit" shall be construed accordingly

 

 

and the cash for you would be unrestrcited use,

 

 

so it would be a mutilple agreement

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/171037-multiple-agreements-falling-within.html

 

So, s.18 CCA comes into play thus:

18. Multiple agreements.—

(1) This section applies to an agreement (a "multiple agreement ") if its terms are such as—

(a) to place a part of it within one category of agreement mentioned in this Act, and another part of it within a different category of agreement so mentioned, or within a category of agreement not so mentioned, or

(b) to place it, or a part of it, within two or more categories of agreement so mentioned.

(2) Where a part of an agreement falls within subsection (1), that part shall be treated for the purposes of this Act as a separate agreement,

So, because all items haven't been separated out agreement is unenforceable.

 

 

Your claim/defence is on the basis that the Loan Agreement, is the subject matter of this claim herein is regulated by the Act and is irredeemably unenforceable as follows -

(1) The Agreement is a multiple Agreement within section 18(1)(a) of the Act.

(2) The parts of the Agreement must be treated as separate Agreements.

(3) The regulated parts of the Agreement are improperly executed and irredeemably unenforceable

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read This first ,

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/211974-what-do-when-debt.html

Then

You might want to send them this ( only to debt collectors/solicitors though) not to a "Principal" "creditor" though. There is another letter i have available you would need to send to them

 

 

 

in Care of:

Your address

Your address

Near: Your post code

 

Name

Address

post code

Of the DCA

 

 

Today’s date

Notice of Request to Cease Harassment

 

Your Reference Number: 123456789

 

Dear ???????,

 

Please read the following notice thoroughly and carefully before responding. It is a notice. It informs you. It means what it says.

 

I refer to your letter dated (date)

 

I feel this matter is serious and wish to deal with it in writing.

As you are a third party intervener in this matter acting without authority, I DO NOT give you permission to interfere in my commercial affairs as you have no legal standing. I do not have a contract with you and any permission that you believe you may have from me is hereby withdrawn. If you believe that you have power of attorney to act on my behalf you are hereby fired, and any consent that you believe you may have, tacit or otherwise, is hereby withdrawn.

 

I am familiar with the terms of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. And I believe, should you continue in contacting me after my request for you to cease your activity, that you will be guilty of harassment and blackmail, and you will be in breach of these acts, and you will be reported to the relevant bodies.

 

I am well aware of Section 40, sub-section (3) which you may consider entitles you to proceed. However upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury you will need to supply the following Proofs of Claims:

 

1. Proof of Claim that your actions are reasonable.

 

2. Proof of Claim that any obligation on my part is due, or believed by you to be due to you, and not to some other party.

 

3a. Proof of Claim that any obligation on my part is to yourself by providing sight of the appropriate contract, or

 

3b. Proof of Claim that any obligation on my part to persons for whom you act by providing sight of the appropriate contract.

 

4. Proof of Claim that any obligation on my part protects you from any future loss.

 

5. Proof of Claim that any obligation on my part is enforcement of a legal process on a Human Being under Common Law jurisdiction, who cannot possibly have such liability under said jurisdiction.

 

6. A hand signed invoice in accordance with The Bills of Exchange Act 1882

 

You would of course need to provide these Proofs, including showing full accounting, if you choose to go to law.

 

Please provide sufficient evidence within ten (10) days from the above date,

Should you provide that I owe your organisation or your client any outstanding amount and that you can provide proof that they have assigned you agency, I should be happy to pay any verified claim in full.

 

Your said failure to provide verification of your claim constitutes your agreement to the following terms: that you are a third party interloper; you have no legal standing; no first-hand knowledge of this matter; your claim is fraudulent; any damages I suffer, you will be held culpable; that any negative remarks made to a credit reference agency will be removed and that you will no longer pursue this matter any further.

 

You will be deemed to have been served notice of my request and I will deem it served three(3) days from the date of this letter. This has been sent by recorded delivery. I am advising you that any communications from you including but not limited to letter, phone calls and text messages received after this date will be recorded/noted with the intention of them being used as evidence.

 

Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity

 

 

By: XXX-YYY :of the ZZZZ family

 

Authorised Representative All Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved.

 

-----------

notes on this Doc... the bits in red are important to you, send exactly as is, read below

 

Do Not sign this letter, there is no need to sign anything that is not a contract

 

 

At the bottom of the document if your name is John Smith

You print John:of the Smith family

 

if your name is John Martin Smith

Your print John-Martin: of the Smith Family

 

Use uppercase/lowercase exactly as on the document for the RED sections.

 

also look at the address section in RED

 

the "In Care of:" your address

 

"Near" your postcode

are important also

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]....Please don't bother my master 'cos my sister & I might bite you...

 

I DO NOT offer legal advice

-

"I just say what I say because everyone is entitled to my opinion!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that nuke em- definitely an interesting read

 

None of my debts are with DCAs (yet)!

 

oh i have another that you send to the Original Creditor, i'll sub this thread and post it up later

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]....Please don't bother my master 'cos my sister & I might bite you...

 

I DO NOT offer legal advice

-

"I just say what I say because everyone is entitled to my opinion!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

here you go.. letter to Original Creditor ( the OC )

 

In Care of:

Address

Address

Near:Post code

 

The CEO ( always send it to the current CEO)

Bank / card co Name

Address ( send to their registered office)

Post code

 

CC: whoever, Collections Department ( send another original with the stamp as below to their collections address as well)

 

Today’s date

 

Re: Account no 123456789

 

Dear CEO,

 

I would be happy to settle any financial obligation I might lawfully owe, as soon as I have received the following documentation from you:

 

1. Validation of the debt (the actual accounting);

2. Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice in accordance with The Bills of Exchange Act 1882);

3. A copy of the contract signed by both parties and therefore binding both parties.

 

I hereby give you ten (10) days to reply to this notice from the above date with a notice sent using recorded post and signed under full commercial liability and penalties of perjury, assuring and promising me that all of the replies and details given to the above requests are true and without deception, fraud or mischief. This notice has been sent by recorded delivery.Your said failure to provide the aforementioned documentation within ten (10) days, from the above date, to validate the debt, will constitute your agreement to the following terms:

 

1. That the debt did not exist in the first place;

OR

2. It has already been paid in full;

AND

3. That any damages I suffer, you will be held culpable;

4. That any negative remarks made to a credit reference agency will be removed;

5. You will no longer pursue this matter any further.

 

 

 

 

Please Note: I wish to deal with this matter in writing and I do not give your organisation permission to contact me by telephone. Should it do so, I must warn you that the calls could constitute ‘harassment’ and I may take action under Section 1 of The Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity

 

sign here, put a unused Stamp here ( any value) and sign through it with blue ink/ blue pen

 

By: XXX: YYYY; Authorised Representative

 

No assured value, No liability. All Rights Reserved.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Notes on this Doc... the bits in red are important to you, send exactly as is, read below

 

re the "XXX: YYYY;"

At the bottom of the document if your name is John Smith

You print John:of the Smith family

 

if your name is John Martin Smith

Your print John-Martin: of the Smith Family

 

Use uppercase/lowercase exactly as on the document for the RED sections.

 

also look at the address section in RED

 

the "In Care of:" your address

 

"Near" your postcode

are important also

 

Finally , send recorded delivery

Edited by nuke em

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]....Please don't bother my master 'cos my sister & I might bite you...

 

I DO NOT offer legal advice

-

"I just say what I say because everyone is entitled to my opinion!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Nuke em,

Like the letters, especially the bit about signing across a stamp.

 

Hello Consumerchicken,

As the need arises, it would be worth starting individual threads in each creditors forum area so you will get input from people who have experience with the particular companies as well.

The methods of dealing with them tend to be the same but different companies will respond in seperate ways.

 

Good luck.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...