Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hamlins charges


masmit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5439 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

could someone give me some advice please.

we have had arrears with our abbey mortgage, which have been a nightmare. They sent our account to litigation (Hamlins) because because they wanted payment of arrears in full.

We agreed £300 on top of our interest only mortgage but felt pressured.

We made payments for 2 months then run in to difficulty(robbed peter to pay paul) now they have sent papers saying their asking the court on the 6th July for repossession because we have missed the last two months.

The arrears are £987, my wifes parents have offered to settle the arrears, which has been a great weight off our minds.

I want to settle these arrears but not any charges off Hamlins, can we do this.

can they still ask for possession to reclaim their charges, or would they not be linked to our property.

any advice greatful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, they can't take you to court for charges as you can't be in arrears with them, they should be added to the outstanding mortgage amount. If you pay the arrears in full then there will be no court hearing - if there are no arrears they cannot continue with the claim for possession.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, they can't take you to court for charges as you can't be in arrears with them, they should be added to the outstanding mortgage amount. If you pay the arrears in full then there will be no court hearing - if there are no arrears they cannot continue with the claim for possession.

 

Thank you Ell-enn for the advice, i shall pay the arrears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, there is little you can do about Hamlin's charges as there will be an indemnity within the mortgage contract allowing them to debit your mortgage account with their costs. There is case law backing up this.

 

Sorry!!

 

Mark

Hi mark,

can you advise?

Are people taking mortgage lenders on claiming unfair charges.

I think i have read about this & its a long old slog, but before it comes to court the lender settles.

Is this possible or will it be made possible when the bank's lose on appeal at the house of lords on unfair charges.

When i spoke to hamlins they came across as nothing more than in house DCA for abbey, i know they will have a department of solicitors, but i believe no solicitor has dealt with my account to date, & £265 litigation charge is unfair. plus more charges for them asking the court to here why they want to repossess our property.

We have recieved no correspondents off the court, just hamlins paperwork.

Any advice would be greatful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn,

Could you advise on the above points,

Is there nothing i can do about the charges like Mark say's.

if i refuse to pay them would they take me to court for the charges seperately.

Sick of being kicked when down, do i have any chance of beating these charges.

any help would be greatful

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the key difference here is between charges and costs. What Hamlins have charged Abbey is clearly going to be applied to your account and there will be a generaly indemnity within your mortgage conditions that this can happen. There is nothing the Court can do about this, and I have been in many a hearing where the Judge confirms this to be the case. The case I was trying to remember was Gomba Holdings v Minories Finance. However, in MY view costs are different from charges.

 

As an example....say Abbey send your case to Hamlins, who do some work preparing for court at a charge out rate of £120 per hour. Each hour is split into units of six minutes. So in total someone spends an hour and a half of your case, and they issue proceedings. They are entitled to bill for their time and the costs of issuing the proceedings (in this case it would be £180 plus the issue fee (£150), plus no doubt the dreaded VAT.

 

Now, I think the bits that could be challenged is if, say, the Abbey have charged you £300 for referring it to their solicitors. I would suggest that that may well be an unfair charge and would be challengable. The problem is that if its in the contract you signed, then it would be up to you to prove that it is an unfair contract term, and that may or may not be made easier following the result of the bank charges claim.

 

I'm not trying to pour water on your claim, believe me I enjoy taking on lenders and beating them down. In fact I have several going on for friends at the moment against Welcome Finance, Yes Car Credit, Capquest etc etc. Just don't want you to think this will be particularly easy.

 

Hope that helps.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, you can't be taken to court for charges! However, as Mark says if it is in your mortgage contract that they can make these charges then the only thing you can do is claim them back as unfair same as bank charges. While they have the right to make these charges - they should only represent the actual cost to them, not their inflated cost.

 

Re the legal costs - you have the right to ask for a statement of these costs showing a breakdown of how it is calculated.

 

Wait until you have paid the arrears then check they have cancelled the court hearing, we can then get to work on the other issues.

 

Ell

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...