Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case  when he penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA CCA credit limit ... CCA received


johno23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I have a CCA back from MBNA not sure if it is enforceable, but will scan up later.

 

However it is very difficult to read and also it states the credit limit is £3000 and I have signed this document.

 

The balance is actually over £9000 with them still adding interest from their default of a CCA from October.

 

Can i take the interest of the 3000 and offer them a F&F for 1500.

 

Is it right that if the agreement was enforceable it would only be for the credit limit of 3000 stated on the signed agreement.

 

ManyThanks

 

Johno23

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi johno

 

an enforceable mbna agreement, enough said

 

it would seem the balance is charges and interest

 

claim them back

 

and no, they cant add charges etc while in dispute, but they do

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a credit agreement is at £10000 but an agreement stated £3000 limit would you only be legally responsible for the £3000 stated in the signed agreement.

 

ManyThanks

 

Johno23

Link to post
Share on other sites

i take it the original credit card was 3 grand and over time they increased it to 10 grand

 

you would be liable for the 10 grand

 

i take it we are talking about a credit card account which is a rolling credit account and not some loan or hp

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a credit card with an agreement which was signed for 3000 credit limit but was increased to 10000.

 

Any way will scan up the agreement in a couple of hours and hopefully it is still unenforceable.

 

The agreement is very small does it have to be a certain size document ie A4

Link to post
Share on other sites

mbna are not very good with agreements

 

to upload the agreement google photo bucket

use the upload link for message boards with out thumb nails option

 

deleate personel details

 

photo bucket is very good for edditing etc

 

it does it for you a lot of the time

Link to post
Share on other sites

The question here is one of construction of the agreement.

 

To be enforceable, it requires a credit limit, interest rates and repayment terms - but they all have to be part of a single signature document to be enforced in Court.

 

We've seen this in other MBNA threads, where the signature appears to be on a different document to the prescribed terms. It would be worth your while looking through some of the MBNA success threads and coming back here with any questions.

 

Oh, thread renamed... :p

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok from reading other threads what I can gather from the two documents attached is that they are not related.

 

The first document states when assessing your application. So i have signed an appliaction form.

It also states before signing the agreement you must read section 11 in the terms and conditions provided.

It also states that we will use our credit scoring system to assess your application.

 

The second document states that the rest of your terms & conditions paragraphs 4 - 19 can be found in the full copy which is enclosed.

also why does it only state interest APR for 1,000, 3000 & 5000

 

so not in the full signed agreement.

 

Not sure though if all the prescribed terms are in the second document.

 

Can someone please help and look to see if i am on the right lines here!

 

Much appreciated

 

Johno

Edited by johno23
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are, yes.

 

The prescribed terms cannot be in another document - they have to appear as part of the agreement document that is signed by the Debtor to be enforceable

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks all for your excellent advice.

 

I have read another thread with the same CCA as me and all comments state it is unenforceable.

 

So will just sit back and wait for their next step!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Interesting the letters i have received recently from MBNA

 

Notice of a potential court order on your property - our intintial investigation indicate that you are a homeowner.

 

We have undertaken a credit enquiry and we have noticed you are making regular payments to some creditors

 

Are they allowed to undertake a credit enquiry

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

ok very little communication from MBNA teally, apart from a phone call now and then.

 

MBNA make contact now on mobile phones so very hard to bar all numbers.

 

however they at the moment keep making threats that they are going to sell the debt.

 

still waiting for their next move

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Johno, I have been sent a CCA exactly the same as yours (except mine is for £15,000). I've subscribed to your thread. Maybe we can help each other?

 

I received mine as part of a S7 DPA request, so I've sent a formal CCA request with £1 to see if they send me the same thing.

 

I can see no evidence that the two halves of the document fit together.

 

(my CCA is here)

 

Cheers

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...

Hi All

 

I have just looked at my credit report with Call credit and I have a default put on my file last year.

 

Well my report states a default for the last eight months, are they allowed to put a default on every month, especially as the account is terminated.

 

Thanks

 

Johno

Edited by johno23
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi all

 

Would like some help if possible please!

 

I have Experto Credite chasing me for a debt of over £10K.

 

I asked Experto for a copy of the credit agreement and default notice.

 

Experto have been assigned the debt by MBNA.

 

The credit agreement I received was unsigned.

 

The default notice was for the arrears dated 9th october 2009 to remedy the breach by the 26th October 2009.

 

I am not sure if this was first or second class.

 

The letter of assignment they sent to me was dated 21st June 2010 as they say this is the date they sent it because the info is computer generated from the date it was ordered from MBNA.

 

Please can someone give me some advice on the dates as the 9th October was a friday. Also if I should send a letter of unlawful recission.

 

Have just donated to this wonderful site again

 

Many Thanks as always!!

 

Johno23

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Cerbs

so i will send the letter that i accept unlawful recission of contract.

is that sent to original creditor or experto who now own the debt

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I realise that I need to send unlawful recission of contract letter due to an invalid deafult notice.

 

Now I have just checked my credit files and a default and termination of the account occured on the 30th Sept 09.

 

Now the default notice was only sent on the 9th Oct 09 for the breach to be remeded on the 26 October 09.

 

What does this mean that they have terminated and defaulted before the receiving of a default notice.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi

 

I have just had a letter sent to me by Fairfax solicitors, debt was sold to credite experto who have now got fairfax to contact me.

 

Are fairfax likely to go to court if a ignore, or do i need to respond.

 

Anyone got any ideas of a letter i should send.

 

Thanks

 

Johno

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...