Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Littlewoods - sent me a letter admitting no cca what now?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5472 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please can someone give me advice re Littlewoods, please forgive me this is my first thread and you've guessed it i am a newbie to all of this.

 

I originally had 2 accounts with Littlewoods and got into difficulty paying them, i contacted Littlewoods and they merged two accounts into one debt in 2007, so overall i have got 3 account numbers. I want to reclaim

my charges back so contacted them and received alll statements back for the third account only, they were really difficult to understand but i managed to work out they owed me about £275 but they were all charges for £5 £10 or £12, i wrote to them and asked for these back but they said no due to them being under £12 and the fos would not investigate as they were in the guidlines, so i telephoned them and requested the rest of the statements for before 2007, I have been told that these statements are not available because they are old accounts and due to the first account

(which was an index store card) the shop no longer in existance they do not have the details, they also tried to tell me the first original account did not exist but i have proof i had all these accounts because i was sat

looking at them on my experian credit file while i was on the telephone talking to them and sure enough at that time they were 3 2 or 1 month in arrears all year. So Littlewoods have requested i print it off and send it to them for proof of the accounts. What do i do now the charges prior to 2007 will be the bigger ones but i dont know what to do. I also have a letter from them stating they do not have the cca agreement.

This debt is also with NDR I only owe £160 pound now and i want to carry on paying this as i want this debt finished asap.

Oh yes one more thing they did send statements back to 2003 but prior to 2007 all statements had £0 owing, they also admitted in telephone conversation that they had missed a few charges off

Any help will greatly appreciated also any template letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi

To start send an SAR http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca.html

 

You could include the account No's, the fee is £10.00 once you have all the information ask for all charges back.

 

Regards

 

andy

Edited by old_andrew2007
added link
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already issued them with a sar and the statements they sent back were to 2003, but there were only charges on the statements back to 2007 all the other statements simply said £0 as if i hadnt purchased any goods from them, but on my credit file it clearly shows that i was in arrears

for 3, 2, and 1 month all the way through the year on the 2 accounts before they merged them into the one account which i am paying off now.

if these accounts were in arrears then prior to 2006 i am sure the charges

would be higher than the £10 and £12 thats on the statements that they say are legal charges, littlewoods even told me they were not allowed to discuss the account numbers as this was against the law and that they didnt acknowledge the two original accounts, thats why i have copied the information to send to them as proof.

i got the account numbers from ndr by acting a little dumb the the poor guy at ndr didnt suspect a thing lol

any advice would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wondered are they breaking the law by not sending me the right information that should be on the statements, the ones they sent me were all in code and it took me ages to sort all the charges out.

 

When i phoned them about the missing information i asked them to send me the cca, the letter admitting they could not supply the cca arrived the next day (i didnt have to pay for it) I have also requested the missing information that should have been on the statements, i was told that the

information was no longer with them and they would have to look through the archives.

once i had requested my charges back i was sent a spreadsheet with all the charges on, it was really easy to understand as it was just a list of charges, why they didnt do this in the first place is beyond me just wanted to make it difficult.

The last 3 charges on the spreadsheet that were for £12 were for one of the accounts that they had merged, when i asked them about the account they admitted there were a few charges missing ( i assume she was looking at them while we spoke) the last charge on the statement was for number 100 but she told me there were also charges on statement 99 and 98 of which they have not supplied. So clearly they are lying. They do have all the information.

I just do not know what letter i should be sending now

I am not going to phone them any more i might loose my temper.

If i put the account in dispute can i still pay the debt to ndr?

All i want is my charges back.

Also i phoned ndr and asked them if they were part of littlewoods, are they classed as a third party? There answere was we are not really part of littlewoods but we are kind of internal, so what the hell does that mean?

please help i am so confused lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

further to your telephone call of 20/04/2009 concerning your request in relation to a copy of your consumer credit agreement,

 

on checking your account details i can confirm i am unable to locate a copy of your cca. however, i should explain that, whilst a court has power under section 127 of the consumer credit act 1974 to decide that we cannot enforce the agreement, it does not mean that the debt does not exist, there is clear evidence of a credit based relationship between littlewoods shop direct group and yourself.

 

if after we have dealt with your request you are still unhappy and you feel the matter has not been resolved to your satisfaction you may be eligible to refer your concerns to the fos but must do so within six months of our final response

 

 

that was the letter received

all i want is my charges back lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all smoke and mirrors, yes the debt does exist in the absence of an enforceable agreement but it cannot be pursued through the courts & there's case law to back it up;

 

Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 633, Sir Andrew Morritt, Vice Chancellor said:

The creditor must…be taken to have made a voluntary disposition, or gift, of the loan monies to the debtor. The creditor had chosen to part with the monies in circumstances in which it was never entitled to have them repaid

In the case of Dimond v Lovell [2000] UKHL 27, Lord Hoffmann said:

Parliament intended that if a consumer credit agreement was improperly executed, then subject to the enforcement powers of the court, the debtor should not have to pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about the charges they have put on the account can i still claim them back even if they are below the fos recommondation

Do they come to more than what is outstanding on the account?

I still want to pay the debt it is only £160 i figured if i kept up payments they cant default the account out of spite

Haven't they already defaulted you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

charges were £277 pound that i put a claim in for, but some of the information was missing on the statements, so i asked them for the rest of the info but they say they dont have it, so i am 4 years worth of information missing

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could write and suggest that in the absence of an enforceable CCA & the absence of statements, the fact that they are in breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Money Laundering Act 2002 it would be prudent for them to write off the remaining debt otherwise you will have no other option other than to recover the unfair charges via other means which would inevitably involve the OFT, the FSA and the Information Commissioners Office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have just had a look at the sar letter that i have sent to littlewoods and i have only put the account number on for the existing account. i automatically assumed that with the two accounts merging into this last account they would give me statements for all three accounts back to 2003

account 1 was opened on 28/07/1999

account 2 was opened on 19/02/2000

both these accounts were merged to become account 3 on

23/05/2007

littlewoods have sent me the statements going back 6 years, but any statements prior to 23/07/2007 have all got 0 balance on them.

I was then sent a spreadsheet just listing charges, these went back to 2007 same as the statements, but there were 3 other charges on the spreadsheet for account 2, this is when i phoned them requesting the details for the original 2 accounts but they denied any accounts existed.

 

I told them they did exist as i am looking at them right now on my experian credit file, (they are all under shop direct finance) the 2 original accounts were in arrears for 3, 2 and 1 month. no statements have arrived for these. She even told me that shop direct were not part of them! conversation then went to why have you put information on my credit file then and why are you still updating it. if accounts are being denied then they should take this information off, she then told me to print off what it said about the 3 accounts on my credit file or copy them and send it into them.

 

I think i am going to write to them again requesting a spread sheet of all charges on all accounts and take it from there.

will let you know how i get on

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps i think my charges on these accounts will be far greater than the £160 i owe them now.

 

with them not having a cca does that mean i can claim all charges back because i have technically ( due to no proof of agreement ) not agreed to paying these, i have only agreed to pay back the debt with interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps i think my charges on these accounts will be far greater than the £160 i owe them now.

 

with them not having a cca does that mean i can claim all charges back because i have technically ( due to no proof of agreement ) not agreed to paying these, i have only agreed to pay back the debt with interest.

Dont know wether this is any help but.........

 

I dealt with the missus Littlewoods account, roughly same as you, no agreement but saying the relationship is there etc etc.

They will not refund charges without a fight, so i said we are going to just ignore all correspondence until they negotiate said charges, and the Account would remain in dispute till that time comes. They passed the account to Lowells, and i wrote the BEMUSED letter, and pointed out no agreement,

Lowells wrote back saying they had BOUGHT the debt, and in light, they will not pursue it any more. I was surprised Lowells gave up so easy.

I have not checked the credit files yet, but It may be worth you looking at the same sort of action!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps i think my charges on these accounts will be far greater than the £160 i owe them now.

 

with them not having a cca does that mean i can claim all charges back because i have technically ( due to no proof of agreement ) not agreed to paying these, i have only agreed to pay back the debt with interest.

 

Yes you can. Write back to them and state that under the Data Protection Act you are entitled to all the information they hold on you as a person not just a single account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...