Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not really. His claim will succeed simply because its a simple matter of a lost parcel and no insurance. Its not a complex case so I think he’ll be fine, especially as it is P2G who arent very good at defending claims but I ageee its not been handled at all well.   My only concern with withdrawing is that he loses £35 in the case of £240 but thats a matter for him   I dont think it has a reduced chance of success if OP actually replies and actions things but if not then ofcourse it will struggle.   My concern is if he starts again it’ll be just as sporadic.   Maybe close thread and let him make a new one if hes ready to engage?
    • Please will you start reading up on the stories on the some form especially the pinned post. I have to say that I'm concerned that you feel that a warning from P2G is going to affect your rights and is going to subvert statutory law. I think you've been here for a few months and I would have hoped that by now you would understand that terms and conditions must always be interpreted in the light of overriding statute. Also I suggested that once you have done the reading on the sub- forum then you would understand the information that we would need in order to give you the best help. The fact that you haven't told us what the item was suggested also that you haven't done the reading. Please give us full details including identity of the item, value, where these properly declared? Dates – blah blah blah. Not paying attention to P2G. Pay attention to us
    • P2G can make clear whatever they want frankly, the judge isnt going to sit there and go “they told you to buy their insurance and you didn’t” and then dismiss your claim.  I would say you should send a formal complaint then after 7 days sent a LOC. Day 21 from now submit your claim on OCMC.    
    • I thought i could just use ( copy and paste)  the terminology from my other post earlier in the year when i previously claimed against P2g .   The parcel hasnt been 'officially ' lost yet i have another 13 days before their 'investigation' ends and then theyll probably offer the postage back as i didnt take the 'insurance'   But to recap ,  The parcel was booked through P2g and sent with Evri. No Protective Insurance was taken out. The parcels value is only £48 plus postage of £3 and the value of the parcel was declared The parcels tracking says while it was in Evri's system it was sent to an 'incorrect' depot and tracking would be updated in 24 hrs which it didnt and the delivery date passed, i then had a live chat with P2g who opened an investigation and im waiting to hear what's happened. My only concern is,  last time i claimed P2g made it clear that in future i must take out their protective insurance which i gavent and im wondering whether this will ' complicate' things ...  
    • it is precisely for these reasons that the OP should withdraw the claim and begin again. Firstly, the case has been badly handled from the start. The OP hasn't come to us and stuck to it in a regular engaging way. Secondly, it seems that the OP is now being advised on the basis of it being a matter of principle rather than looking at a sensible and pragmatic outcome. We have a duty to the people who come to help us to try and get the best solution for them that we can. Secondary is that we want to notch up a further victory against the parcel delivery industry – and frankly it doesn't matter which company it is as long as we get a victory. If we simply urge someone to continue a case at their own expense in a claim which has a very reduced chance of success, simply because it gives us personal satisfaction, then this is really contrary to what we do and certainly contrary to the interests of the claimant. I'm now urging the OP (Original Poster) to withdraw and to start again and work with us very closely in order to get a much more certain victory. By continuing this claim, not only with the OP risk even more money, it will take more time in the sense of failure will be demoralising. Better to feel that one is in control by exercising one's own choices and taking the long view
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cupcake vs Egg 03


cupcake68
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4578 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 480
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

I have received a reply from Fredricksons that includes a copy of my Egg agreement!

 

This was an online agreement apparently applied for in July 2007.

 

What happens now?

 

They terminated whilst the account was in dispute but now they have sent me the agreement!

 

HELP!

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks SS!

 

I'll have a look at it tomorrow when I have time (and quiet!!) to digest it.

 

Was thinking, surely they were very wrong to DN me when they hadn't complied so maybe my first move should be to complain to FOS and get a reference number from them. I've read on another thread they back off once they know FOS are involved and might buy me a bit more time.

 

Is this worth a go?

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

I have not had the chance to sit (in peace!!) and take in all the information in the very long thread of PT's but I am getting there!!!

 

I am going to post up the agreement Fredricksons sent me here Looking at it, it looks as if they just printed it off themselves (as possibly I might have been able to!) from my online account. I'm guessing this because of the print notes ate the top and bottom of the pages.

 

Is this correct and if so does that mean they didn't have to reply to my request for CCA?

 

I will be looking at PT's thread tonight once the kids are in bed!! to try and find some fault with it.

 

Thanks for any advice.

 

Cupcake

Edited by cupcake68
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just starting to read PT's thread............

 

Being that my agreement appears to be printed off on 16/12/2009 would that not probably be my current agreement?

 

Surely they have changed a few bits since 2007?

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok!

 

I cannot see any mention of charges on my agreement (ie default charges etc)

 

Also found thid on PT's thread

 

As to enforceability? an agreement cannot be enforced unless there is a term stating the credit limit, the term must be easily recognisable to the layperson as being a term setting out the credit limit (s9 makes it very clear the distinction between credit and all other charges)

I also don't see any mention of my credit limit......!

Only on p9 of 75 so will no doubt find out more..........

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have almost an identical agreement to you!! The letter fom bryan carter is identical!

But yours has some extra bits! and some amounts are different. I have put yours and mine althouh the amounts will differ I guess as the rate is different.

3 APR yours 16.9% variable mine is 15.9%

4.1 dates and % different (but mine wa before yours)

4.2 yours says condition 17 mine says condition 11.6 or 17

4.5 I DON'T HAVE THIS!

5.2 I have (i)card payment protection premium (if applicable) and charges

(ii) cash advances including your current statement

(iii)identical aprt from i have purchases included in your current statement (including purchases at a promotional rate)

(iv) Cash advances put on your account after your latest statement date; and (v) purchases put on your account after your latest statement date.

6 yours says £130.37 mine £123.65

7.1 yours is £16 mine is £20

7.2 yours is 3% mine is 2%

 

Mine is dated january 2006 and all the paperwork came from Bryan Carter & co.

I will subscribe to this thread as i will be very interested to see what happens.

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Sarnie

 

I'm a little bemused by this account!!

 

I expected Egg to return my CCA request immediately. This was a card taken out quite recently and was applied for online, so I assumed they would produce an enforceable agreement.

 

They didn't reply and then they sent a DN (didn't appear dodgy - although I'm not sure about the numbers they were quoting!) and terminated without replying to my CCA request.

 

So I don't really know where I stand!!

 

I assume if they terminated without supplying the requested paperwork they were at fault but... having now sent me this latest copy of my agreement are they still wrong?!!

 

I owe Egg £15k so I am keen to find out where I stand!

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys

 

I have now received letters from Fredricksons and Bryan Carter on this account.

 

Freds offering me full and final settlement if i contact them within 48hors of their letter (not sure how I do that being that it is dated 080210 and I only received it today!!

 

B C saying I must pay in full within 14 days of 220110 or they will recommend their client that proceedings be issued without further notice.

 

HELP!!!! (please!)

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys!

 

I sent this letter to BC last week....http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/575-letter-to-solicitors-threatening-legal-action-in-default-of-agreement-request-

 

but crossed in the post, I received a letter from BC on Saturday saying if I do not pay up "COURT PROCEEDINGS WILL BE ISSUED ON 23 FEBRUARY 2010 IF PAYMENT IS NOT RECEIVED AT THIS OFFICE BY THAT DATE"

 

Should I be concerned?

 

Thanks Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bigdebtor

 

I could do that but will I not be contradicting myself if I do that? On one hand I am saying I will not pay while the account is in dispute and it shouldn't have even been passed to you and on the other I am offering to pay.

 

Would I just phone up and make a payment? Otherwise I couldn't get it there by 23rd!

 

Thanks cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could ring and offer a debit card payment by phone - but only on basis that they suspend things and don't proceed with action on 23rd.

 

Otherwise there is always the chance they are bluffing and won't do anything anyway on 23rd.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cupcake

 

I've been thinking about you all night.;)

 

I think the fact that the letters crossed in the post gives you a chance to get things put on hold without losing face or paying out.

 

Why not e-mail [email protected] or info@bryancartersoliciors,co,uk and send a soft copy of your letter telling them the 2 letters crossed in the post and you assume they will now wait on Egg getting their act together as required by law?

 

I e-mailed our nice Uncle Bryan and funnily enough got a reply from [email protected] :confused:

 

BD

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much AC!!

 

I will get onto it now.

 

I will also email BC (now I have an email address - thanks to BD!!) to let him know I have complained.

 

Thank you again. I was really starting to worry about this one!!

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...