Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • twill be even better tonight and already the KP is predicted further south than last night. incredible pictures from canada and australia on glendale . so big to me it was out of view to ne camera. gonna try a drone tonight too. dx
    • n244 is the imp one please we need everything inc exhibits but not statements. dx
    • the first dn was void as it only gave 14 days not accounting for postage time so you didnt get it with 14 days remaining hence the 2019 one. pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] .............. there is not harm in filing our DN late SB defence now too. alternative whereby claimant intimates SB date=defaulted date and that has been registered months after the last payment . 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on dd/mm/yyyy.  2.The date last payment made was the dd/mm/yyyy   3.The Default Notice was issued dd/mm/yyyy and served several months after the initial breach thus the cause of action delayed by X months and the Limitations period prolonged to 6 years and X months which in effect allows the creditor to stop time running and the creditor having effective control of when a limitation period begins or even starts to run.  4.Therefore the Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any true cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.  5.The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £x or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. dx  
    • Just a quick note to thank you for the reminder. Me and Mrs Mycathasfleas found a use for an exercise mat and lay on our backs watching it. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dinkjames v HSBC Credit Card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5185 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all. First off, thanks for a great forum. I have learnt a lot from reading through the various threads, but need some more specific help now.

 

Outlined below is a brief(ish) history between HBSC CC and myself.

 

The credit agreement was entered into on 23/01/2003 according to my credit report. I got into trouble after losing my job when the company went bust owing me quite a bit of money. I basically buried my head in the sand, but now have to do something about it.

 

Here's the history:

 

22/05/08 - Letter from HSBC stating that after an account review, they have decided to terminate the agreement.

23/05/08 - Default notice received. Date to remedy breach is 06/06/08. Amount owed :£xxxxx.xx Overdue amount: £xxx.xx

12/06/08 - HSBC use their right to offset and transfer £xxxxx.xx from my current account to the credit card leaving an outstanding balance of £xxx.xx

18/06/08 - After complaining about the offset, HSBC transfer £xxxx.xx back to my current account and credit the CC again.

12/09/08 - Default is registered on my credit file for the amount of £xxxxx

13/10/08 - Last statement received.

03/12/08 - Letter from CapQuest demanding payment of £xxxxx

02/01/09 - Letter from HL Legal on behalf of CQ for payment of £xxxxx

13/01/09 - I write to CQ, HL and HSBC using a template letter from here making an offer of payment. I include list of creditors and Income/Expediture created on the CCCS website. Also request that interest and charges be stopped.

17/01/09 - Offer refused letter from CQ with a demand for a higher payment

23/01/09 - Template letter back with offer again stating I cannot pay more.

27/01/09 - Refusal letter from CQ again.

29/01/09 - Refusal letter from CQ demanding higher offer

14/02/09 - I resend the template letters stating other creditors had accepted offers.

24/02/09 - CQ write back say they are no longer acting for HSBC and have returned the paperwork to HSBC.

24/03/09 - Letter from HSBC stating that as they had not heard from me, they were passing my account to Metropolitan Collections Services.

28/03/09 - I reply to HSBC including copies of all correspondence between me, HSBC, CQ and HL. Again make offer to pay and ask that interest/charges be stopped. No response.

25/03/09 - Threatogram from MCS

30/03/09 - Threatogram from MCS

06/04/09 - Bailiff threatogram from MCS

07/04/09 - Letter from MCS saying that offer had been received and they needed Inc/Exp plus creditors to consider it. I never sent them an offer and the offer amount is £20 more than I offered HSBC.

08/04/09 - I call MCS to confirm receipt of letters. Refuse to discuss finances with them on the phone.

20/04/09 - I send a CCA request under CPR31.16. Reply required by 11/05/09

22/04/09 - CCJ threatogram from MCS

29/04/09 - Acknowledgement from MCS about CPR31.16 and they have referred it to HSBC and case in abeyance until they respond.

 

Since the default notice, I have made payments of £xxxx.xx to this account and they have added at least 3 late payment charges totalling £36.

 

My primary concern is the default notice on my credit report. I would like to get that removed and would appreciate some advice/tips. I believe the way to do this may be to prove that the default notice is invalid and/or prove that the debt is unenforceable due to them not having the CCA.

 

My default notice letter date and default date is 15 inclusive and 13 exclusive. My understanding is that thay need to give you 14 days notice plus 2 days to serve by post ie 16 days. I did not get this?

 

Secondly, the default notice states that if I do not remedy the breach, they will terminate the agreement without further notice and demand immediate payment of £xxx.xx together with interest. Two questions here. A) They sent me a letter before the Default notice stating that they had closed the account, so the agreement was terminated before the default notice was served. If you don't have an agreement, you cannot serve a notice? and B) They are only demanding £xxx.xx whereas the balance is actually £xxxxx.xx. If £xxx.xx is all they wanted under the default notice, then the account would have been settled when they did the offset? In actual fact they kept more than they should have and I have also being paying regularly since.

 

Sorry for the long post. I hope someone can give me advice as to resolving this mess and getting HSBC off my back.

Edited by Dinkjames

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

For starters the DN is faulty they have to give you 14 clear days from receipt of it to remedy the default, they have not allowed service of it by post. With doing this all they can claim is the arrears up to the DN. Do not let them know there is a defective DN until the a/c is closed, once it is all they can claim is the arrears. In effect once the a/c is closed the balance is wiped out.

 

In the meantime, send them a SAR which will cost £10 http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca.html from this you will be able to determine what unfair charges have been added to both your CC and your current a/c which you can claim back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not let them know there is a defective DN until the a/c is closed, once it is all they can claim is the arrears. In effect once the a/c is closed the balance is wiped out.

 

To clarify the account closed status, I have a letter from HSBC dated 22 May 2008 and I quote "Following a thorough review of your account, I am writing to inform you that we are ending your credit card agreement" The letter includes a demand to pay the overdue amount of £494.11

 

The default notice was issued one day after this letter ie 23 May 2008. HSBC have stopped sending me statements on the account and the account has been removed from my online banking.

 

Does this imply the account is closed?

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the others will verify but I think they may have shot themselves in both feet. They have send you a DN giving you the opportunity to remedy an a/c which is closed. I don't think they have any further claim.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Default notice is incorrect as CA correctly says.....wait to see if they produce the agreement too....and keep us posted - you might be interested in this too - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/170345-tale-dodgy-dn.html

 

As for the account termination aspect, i'm not 100% sure on this...it could possibly be seen as an unlawful recission of contract !!! Hopefully others will add to this thread.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the meantime, send them a SAR which will cost £10 http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca.html from this you will be able to determine what unfair charges have been added to both your CC and your current a/c which you can claim back.

 

Thanks. Will send that off to them tomorrow and see what comes of it. Although I have original copies of most of the items listed in the letter.

 

Be interesting to see if they are the same.

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I haven't received my credit agreement under CPR31.16, so firing off another letter today to MCS requesting the agreement and informing them that I regard the account in dispute until their client produces the agreement.

 

Let's see what I get back.

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I did, thanks. Made for good reading.

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time for an update.

 

MCS did not respond to my CPR31.16 request, so I sent them a letter on Tuesday stating that the account is now in dispute. No reply yet.

 

Send off a CCA request direct to HSBC on Monday. Got a reply from them today. All the expected excuses about the CCA not requiring them to provide a true copy of the agreement, etc, etc. Instead they sent me a Credit Card Request form (which I might add does not contain any of the prescribed terms) along with various T&C's from the last few years. I won't even bother to scan them up, unless someone really wants to look at them.

 

Monday a second 'In Dispute' letter will be in the post to them.

 

So, I would now assume that they do not have a properly signed and executed agreement, thus the debt is unenforceable. If they did, why not simply send it to me instead of stalling?

 

HSBC: 0 Me: 1

 

Oh, and they sent my £1 back too ;)

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: Just got two letters from MCS, one dated 14 May 2009 thanking me for my offer of payment which they are happy to accept. Please complete the standing order form. Your last payment will be in May 2023 :p Love it!!

 

I have never made an offer to MCS. And all the offers I have made to HSBC with requests to hold charges and interest, have been met with stoney silence.

 

Strange thing is, if HSBC had accepted the offer in the first place, I would probably have paid them on a unlawfully terminated agreement and never found this site. Lucky for me :D

 

The other letter is regarding my request for the CCA under CPR31.16. They have referred the matter back to their client and will forward me the CCA, if it is still obtainable.

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I got an acknowledgement from HSBC today regarding my SAR. They have sent me a form to complete regarding which branch of HSBC I would like the data sent to for collection. Will get that into the post to them on Tuesday. Let's see what that delivers as they are giving me the runaround with the CCA. The letter is actually signed by a real person:D

 

I sent my initial SAR letter to their head office at Canada Square. The address regarding the SAR request has come from HSBC Bank PLC, UK Data Protection Compliance, Griffin House, 2-01, 41 Silver Street Head, Sheffield, S1 3GG. Maybe a good one to use for SAR requests for HSBC then.

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sheffield team actually know what they are doing - unlike MCS. MCS is, of course, just part of HSBC and only send out template letters. You will probably soon hear from DG Solicitors - also part of HSBC.

 

In my experience, they will eventually realise that they have cocked it all up, and give in - but they will persevere for a while.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I got a response to HSBC regarding my In Dispute letter. They insist that the Credit Card Request Form is a true copy of my CCA and they have complied with my request. They have sent the £1 back again.

 

Is there a template letter to send them now?

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a response to HSBC regarding my In Dispute letter. They insist that the Credit Card Request Form is a true copy of my CCA and they have complied with my request. They have sent the £1 back again.

 

Is there a template letter to send them now?

 

Is the form anything like what you could have/did signed/sign?

 

If it is, and they've also sent you current and historic t's and c's, then they may have complied. Doesn't mean it's enforceable though (which plainly a blank doc is not).

 

If it's nothing like you would have received (ie from the wrong year etc), then they have not complied. Although they can technically send you a blank copy of any old agreement, it must be the same as what you would have signed at the time you opened the account - that is to say the details on it must bear relation to the details you would have seen on your form when you signed it.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The credit card request form was for a Gold/Morrisons credit card. I have never applied for either of those two cards. My statements are all for a Platinum Card, and if I did sign anything, it would have been in branch.

 

It is not even an application form. There is not a single T&C in sight, never mind within the 4 corners of the document.

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they're talking pants then aren't they:rolleyes: They've not complied and they know it, hence the argy-bargying about it.

 

I suppose your choices are to keep on keeping on at them, or inform the FOS (may be a useless exercise though). Maybe TS could be of some help if they are stating this fulfils their obligations under the CCA1974?

 

If they pull the same rubbish with your SAR I think you can get the ICO involved.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, I am not too concerned about them finding a CCA for my account. As long as they can't produce it, they cannot enforce the debt. The only outcome I would like is to ensure the account stays in dispute, that they cannot keep adding interest and charges.

 

I think they will comply with the SAR, as it is a different department and all the correspondence has been of a totally different tone, than with my CC.

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just reading back over your thread I don't think you need to be particularly concerned at all about the agreement anyway due to the default/termination combo.

 

If it's definitely been terminated, as has already been said they're limited to the arrears amount and the agreement portion of your argument is just icing on the cake.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just reading back over your thread I don't think you need to be particularly concerned at all about the agreement anyway due to the default/termination combo.

 

If it's definitely been terminated, as has already been said they're limited to the arrears amount and the agreement portion of your argument is just icing on the cake.

 

id like to see the original letter posted up

 

IF they wrote to you in terms that they had reviewed the account and decided to terminate it they may argue that what this meant was that they were about to start the formal process - which would be confirmed by the fact that you then received a DN (albiet a faulty one)

 

If however in that first letter they demanded a specific amount (ie the whole balance of the account be paid then it could be construed as a termination and an unlawful rescission

 

however i have this feeling that the letter does not go on to demand repayment and that it is in fact a pre warning of the action to follow

 

seeing the letter would help

 

notwithstanding the foregoing it will still have been unlawfully rescinded if they terminated after that fault DN but obviously the first one would be even better

Link to post
Share on other sites

id like to see the original letter posted up

 

IF they wrote to you in terms that they had reviewed the account and decided to terminate it they may argue that what this meant was that they were about to start the formal process - which would be confirmed by the fact that you then received a DN (albiet a faulty one)

 

If however in that first letter they demanded a specific amount (ie the whole balance of the account be paid then it could be construed as a termination and an unlawful rescission

 

however i have this feeling that the letter does not go on to demand repayment and that it is in fact a pre warning of the action to follow

 

seeing the letter would help

 

notwithstanding the foregoing it will still have been unlawfully rescinded if they terminated after that fault DN but obviously the first one would be even better

 

Or just said simply that they had terminated without having asked for a payment (I've got this on a couple where it's definitely 'we have terminated', past tense, not a threat of things to come). If they have just said we are going to terminate though then obviously it's not what you want - you need an actual termination in one form or another.

 

DD's right, knowing the wording would be helpful:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Nothing much happening. It has passed from Metropolitan to DG Solicitors to Central Debt Recovery Unit (all the same company) and backwards and forwards between these three parties. When DG Solicitors threatened legal action, I sent them a request under CPR for a copy agreement. They replied that their client is unable to provide a copy of the agreement as they cannot find it. So, it is dead in the water.

 

Now I get letters from DG and CDRU on a weekly basis offering me discounts between 20% to 30% if I settle in the next 14 days and they will mark the debt as satisfied with credit agencies.

 

I am just ignoring all their letters for now, as they are unlikely to implement court action.

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...