Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • luckily like this thread VCS/DCB(L) PCN spycar capture - PAPLOC Now claimform - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 4 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group although no on the crossing, same applies to you so WS time. there are numerous threads here on pedestrian crossing claimforms by VCS at Bristol and at other airports so use our enhanced google searchbox and find them. really a bad idea to vanish for SIX months and not been have reading up here.....................  
    • Not at all.  The onus is on them to ensure that their invoice respects the provisions of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to establish keeper liability.  Which it can't as the area is covered by bye-laws. Spot on. Irrelevant as to whether you entered into a contract with VCS to pay them £100 if you didn't obey what was written on their silly signs. Who cares?  What about their ridiculous generic Particulars of Claim where they deliberately mix up driver and keeper. And where do they mention this?  You haven't shown us anything. Of course you have to prepare a Witness Statement and you'd better get on with it. This is the problem here - you've disappeared for months & months, haven't kept us updated and presumably haven't read other VCS threads.  That needs to change - now. Otherwise you will lose - simple as that. For a start - please upload the court order which fixes the hearing date plus plus where "VCS mentioned my initial defence was generic and clearly copied from the internet".  We're not mind readers.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just how many secret credit agencies are there?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3771 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

On the subject of the DPA, I had an interesting chat with Experian the other week and the very helpful advisor volunteered a little piece of information. Whenever you apply for finance and are turned down, you are entitled to appeal that decison. Now in communication with various mortgage companies, so many of them say that there is no appeal if you are turned down for a mortgage:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/pdf/uksi_20082353_en.pdf

 

Here is proof of a direct link between the Government and N. Hunter Ltd. An amendment to an Act of Parliament.

 

The Government has passed a law stating that the government departments and local authorities can pass any information held on you to these specific listed commercial organizations. In turn, these organizations can provide the same authorities with information they hold on you from other commercial sources, such as banks, your applications, etc.

 

(a) CIFAS;

(b) Experian Limited;

© Insurance Fraud Investigators Group;

(d) N Hunter Limited;

(e) The Insurance Fraud Bureau;

(f) The Telecommunications United Kingdom Fraud Forum Limited.

Edited by Danchi
addition
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also received this letter from National Hunter.

 

They say they hold no data about me (but have kept my £10 anyway!).

 

nationalhunter.jpg

 

Thats probably why your application was declined, Cos they have no record or information about you

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/pdf/uksi_20082353_en.pdf

 

Here is proof of a direct link between the Government and N. Hunter Ltd. An amendment to an Act of Parliament.

 

The Government has passed a law stating that the government departments and local authorities can pass any information held on you to these specific listed commercial organizations. In turn, these organizations can provide the same authorities with information they hold on you from other commercial sources, such as banks, your applications, etc.

 

(a) CIFAS;

(b) Experian Limited;

© Insurance Fraud Investigators Group;

(d) N Hunter Limited;

(e) The Insurance Fraud Bureau;

(f) The Telecommunications United Kingdom Fraud Forum Limited.

 

That's very interesting. I have recently had a case against a local council as well, so perhaps I will SAR N Hunter again in a few months and see if they have anything new about me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
That's very interesting. I have recently had a case against a local council as well, so perhaps I will SAR N Hunter again in a few months and see if they have anything new about me.

What if national hunter do not hold information on you or anyone else , what if they gather information send it on then destroy what they had when you SAR them they could then say we do not hold any information MAKES YOU THINK :idea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talk about paranoia

Idont think anyone on these forums is paranoid, i think we are trying to get the truth from an ever growing tangled web of lies and corrupt companies using every which way they can to get every penny they can from us aided and abetted by government bodies , slimy corrupt polititians and shadowy organisations who hide behind laws that are suposed to protect us:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fact 1 cra collect information on us Fact 2 there is an ever growing list of these companies Fact 3 they try everything they can to not give us the information they hold on us Fact 4 They were started to give banks a good idea of who was a good payer a good risk Fact 5 They have expanded and now offer debt collection ,conflict of interests methinks FACT 6 THEY PAY POLITITIANS IF YOU WANT THE PROOF SPEND A LITTLE TIME READING THE STICKYS AS I CANT BE BOTHERED TO FIND IT FOR YOU

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read this forum for many a year and dealt with a lot of these bottom feeders. For you to suggest I read more having just joined and 6 post shows naievety at best and ignorance at worst. I refuse to speculate as all it does is become a vehicle to increase peoples worry.

 

Your suggestion was just that. If somone can offer real evidence then we can discuss it further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read this forum for many a year and dealt with a lot of these bottom feeders. For you to suggest I read more having just joined and 6 post shows naievety at best and ignorance at worst. I refuse to speculate as all it does is become a vehicle to increase peoples worry.

 

Your suggestion was just that. If somone can offer real evidence then we can discuss it further.

Then dont speculate and dont speculate about me as i am on another forum as well i have been for years i have helped hundreds of people defend themselves against bottom feeders as you call them Istand by what i have said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paranoid conspiracy stories ,i have spent a long time researching dca and cra , banks ,dwap , dvla, and many others which i wont go into ,along with many others i have found links with government and many other shadowy organisations i am at the moment preparing legal argument to take some of these untouchables to task that for obvious reasons is all i have to say to you on this matter

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have expected better from someone like yourself JonCris. All I have said is let's be careful of starting fires without enough fuel to keep it burning.

 

I'm open to debate it I can see something worth discussing. All that was said by Yalnif was 'what if' although he now seems to be alluding to something different. If that is the case then I will look forward to seeing the evidence. I wasn't being cynical.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I grew a little tree i was so happy as i wached it grow, i invited all my friends to take a look , but then i started to get paranoid, what if someone found my little tree, i thought about it for a while ,where can i hide my little tree, then it came to me i will hide it in the forest, but paranoid little me started to worry , what if someone stumbled about the forest looking for my little tree and found it, again i thought about this for a while , i talked about it with my friends , one of them said why not hide a leaf on one tree then a leaf on another tree untill you hide all the leafs, great idea,my friend was clever he could read and write, he made me a lovely computer programe that did not have a picture of my tree but it new how to find all the little leafs so i could look at my little tree anytime i wanted so could all my friends ,safe in the knowlege that someone might find a leaf but they would never find my little tree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...