Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • More from the Second Sight guys in the Law Gazette. Post Office Inquiry: Second Sight accountant accuses lawyer of conspiring to pervert course of justice | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Second Sight accountant found compelling evidence in two cases that evidence was withheld, public inquiry is told.  
    • Why have there not been arrests yet? Waiting for the end of an inquiry which seems designed to drag on forever is a feeble excuse "the Post Office “was constantly sabotaging our efforts” to seek the truth and used claims of legal professional privilege – a type of confidentiality which covers legal documents – “to justify withholding documents from us”. "Aujard had said the state-owned body “would not hesitate to take legal action against me” under a “draconian” non-disclosure agreement (NDA)" "Henderson became concerned after reviewing the case file of Jo Hamilton, .. Henderson said the Post Office’s decision to charge Hamilton did not seem to be supported by its own internal security report, and there was evidence that “potentially exculpatory material” had not been disclosed to her at trial or subsequently. “I regarded this as either professional misconduct or, potentially, criminal conduct,” he said."   Horizon IT scandal investigator tells inquiry Post Office was ‘sabotaging our efforts’ | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Ian Henderson, looking into possible miscarriages of justice, said he came to believe he was dealing with ‘a cover-up’  
    • and the elephant in the room     Brexit: New report suggests UK £311bn worse off by 2035 due to leaving EU NEWS.SKY.COM The report came up with a scenario for growth if the UK had stayed inside the EU, and compared it to forecasts the Office for Budget Responsibility made...    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

lloyds tsb


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5468 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I would like to send a reminder letter giving say 14 days to reply If i dont get a reply than i would like to make a full and final offer. so i want enough evidence to show that they had plenty of time to produce this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi

 

requested cca from lloyds

 

after 20 days sent reminder lletter, received back a letter ' sorry re your complaint we aim to deal with this in 28 days blah blah. you can complain to FOS blah blah

 

If i complain do they get fined or just told to get on with it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Link to post
Share on other sites

received a response stating that

 

As your agreement was made before 19th May 1985 we have no obligation to supply you with a copy of your executed agreement

 

Could anyone tell me if this is true

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, andbrat.

 

What sort of account was it ?

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter states

i write in response to your request of your CCA under section 78 of CCa1974

 

As your agreement was made before 19th May 1985 we have no obligation to suppy you with a copy of your execucted agreement. Despite this i enclose

 

A copy of your current terms and conditions and

a signed statement of your account.

 

Despite the fact that we have no obligation to provide you with a copy of the original signed agreement, we are endeaevouring to locate a copy, but pleased be assured that we would not have opened a credit card account without having sight of a signed agreement. ( yeh right!)

 

to summerise, the agreement you have with us is fully enforceable and we shall continue to treat it as such. We will not be entering into any further correspondance with you regarding the provision of a agreements.

 

if you are using a claims management company we would like to remind you of recent warnings issued by the Ministry of Justice.

 

 

it does go on about what is required of them due to s78

 

anyone go any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they might have erred, but can't be certain based on what you have posted.

I assume what they are getting at is that s78 of the CCA did not come into force until May of '85. This would mean that as your agreement pre-dates this then it does not apply.

This said, the act does state that "Sections 77 to 79 apply to an agreement made before [19th May 1985] where the agreement would have been a regulated agreement if made on that day" (schedule 3, s17(2) )

I suppose therefor it matters when exactly you opened the account (20 years ago exactly, or about) and whether the agreement would have been regulated or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

they do go on in the letter to say

 

Compliance with section 78 is achieved by sending you a current version of your agreement but we understand that some customers wrongly believe that they are entitled to an original signed copy of the agreement.

 

you will note that section 78 refers to the requirement to provide a copy of the executed agreement. The executed agreement is the document which has been signed by or on behalf of both parties or, in other words, the original signed agreement - see section 189(1). the copy of the executed agreement, however, is the copy required to be sent by vertue of section 63 of the CCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andbrat - Reading your thread there, it seems LTSB are pulling credit card account agreements out of thin air when they can't find the agreements to actual accounts. My thread 'Unauthorised consolidation of loan and overdraft' has more about that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the second paragraph in their letter appears to contradict the first to the point where LTSB are talking utter nonsense. They say sending you a copy of the current version fulfills the request and then go on to say in the next sentence that Section 78 refers to the original signed agreement? It seems LTSB have got themselves into a bit of a muddle in that statement - but then again, it IS LTSB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

andbrat,

 

When you say a credit card taken out with a Bank Account, don't you mean a Bank Account with a cheque guarantee card.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

No

 

In the olden days when you opened a bank account you sort off automatically got sent a credit card. It may have guarenteed cheques at first, but i closed my bank accounts with TSB in about 1986

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...