Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg Card And Default Notice - invalid?


Stagparty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4657 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well Stagparty, the alleged agreement does not refer to:

"Credit Limit"

rather: "Limit".

 

Whatever, that is supposed to mean.

 

Also I cannot see that you were supplied with any separate Cancellation Rights?

 

Anyhow, have a good look at the Links:)

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - I've spent the last 5 hours or so reading the "Egg Credit Agreement - what I think is wrong with them" thread. Wow - my head is spinning!

 

Based on that it appears that my alleged agreement above the reasons for disputing it would be :

1. It refers to the Approved Limit/Individual Limit rather than Credit Limit

2. No interest rate is quoted for Cash Advances

3. No reference is made to default charges etc.

 

Am I on the right track here?

 

(Mods - please feel free to move this to the specific Egg thread if you feel it would be better there)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the confirmation there AC :)

 

At the risk of sounding completely stupid - does the point that Egg sent only those two sheets (which appear to have been copied onto their letterhead - as one side is upside down! and there is a staple mark in the top corner of one page) with no associated terms and conditions have any relevance at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also think Egg may well have broken a few rules along the way... below are the dates of "happenings"

 

1. Beginning April 09 - sent Egg template letter from CCCS offering a token payment and enclosed first payment,

2. Beginning April 09 - sent CCA request to Egg.

3. Mid April 09 - received Default Notice from Egg.

4. Early May 09 - got letter from Egg saying they wouldn't renew the card when it expired.

5. Mid May 09 - sent Account in Dispute Letter to Egg due to them not complying with CCA request

6. Mid May 09 - got letter from Egg requesting additional info re my identity for CCA request - repiled and told them to get on and do it and that I didn't need to provide additional information.

7. End May 09 - Received a letter agreeing to my token payment for 6 months also suspending interest etc.

8. End May 09 - Received letter from Egg terminating the account for failure to comply with the Default Notice.

9. End May 09 - Default registered with Equifax.

10. Start June 09 - got another letter asking for additional ID re CCA request - wrote a stroppy one back firmly pointing out the account is in dispute

11. Mid June 09 - Wrote and reminded them they hadn't complied with CCA request, that the account was in dispute but "on a strict without prejduice basis and as a gesture of goodwill" enclosed the token payment.

12. Mid July 09 - Same as point 11.

13. Start Aug 09 - Received alleged agreement with just a compliments slip.

 

So it appears that, despite Egg knowing that they haven't complied with the CCA request, they have gone ahead and firstly issued the Default Notice, then Terminated the Account and Registered the Default.

 

To date I have made the payments I agreed to on a without prejudice basis in order to protect myself should the alleged agreement be valid.

 

It seems that Egg have just blatently ignored the law (I guess reading other threads this shouldn't surprise me).

 

Can anyone please suggest some tactics for picking this apart?

 

Again, thanks in advance

SP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks AC - it's easy to let things seem too big a hurdle to climb and the help one receives on here is amazing. I can't thank people, including yourself, enough.

 

The Default Notice is below, as requested.

 

This is page 1

This is page 2

This is page 3

 

It was sent on 20 April 2009

I received it on 23 April 2009

 

I wonder if I may be really cheeky and ask you to cast yoru eye over my Nationwide thread too - those people are really getting my goat at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you please explain why Egg are still in breach of the CCA request please? Is it because the alleged agreement is defective or because they haven't sent the Terms & Conditions etc, or am I barking up the wrong tree entirely?

 

Egg, need to provide the inception T&C's and;

Cancellation Rights.

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is exactly what I would do, if I were you.

 

You made a legal request under section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974;

section 78 requires that the Creditor complies fully with your request by sending you a true signed copy of the credit agreement...and any other document referred to in it.

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much Elsa, and again AC - sorry if it appears like I'm asking stupid questions. I'm trying to understand things as I go on so that hopefully I'm not too much of a pain by asking the same questions going forward!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Elsa is quite right;

Egg should have provided a statement of account also.

 

Technically Egg remain in Default of your section 78 CCA plus they have Defaulted & Terminated your account whilst in breach...a naughty Egg!

 

I guess, there must be some unlawful penalty charges involved here and possibly PPI, did you take out the PPI?

 

When did you receive the Termination letter from Egg?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

To be honest there will be very few penalty charges. Within a month of me telling them I was going to be struggling they'd started the above process. Up to that point I'd never ever missed a payment in the 5 years I'd had the card. This is one of the things that has stuck in my throat - by being honest and upfront and following the advice to communicate with creditors, they do this immediately. I actually told them before I'd missed a payment!

 

RE the PPI - I did take it out, but I made a couple of significant successful claims on it, far more than the premiums I've ever paid, so I don't think I should persue that line.

 

I received the termination letter the last in the last week of May - considerable after they were in breach of my CCA request made at the start of April!

 

Am I right in thinking that by defaulting and terminating the account whilst in breach of the s78 request that Egg have potentially caused themselves some grief, if by some miraculous chance that the alleged agreement was deemed compliant?

 

Again if I've understood it correctly, they have possibly made an unlawful recission of contract and so would only be entitled to the amount of arrears at the time of the breach?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any penalty charges will render the remedy amount on the Default Notice (DN) inneffective;

thus Egg have Terminated the account on the back of an inneffective DN;

as I said before, a naughty Egg and they have caused to themselves some considerable trouble.

Furthermore, the alleged agreement IMO is not compliant.

 

Please take a look at the following thread, upon which I have placed a link to this one:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/208663-tale-dodgy-dn-further-86.html

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow - that's a heck of a thread - On the basis it took me about 5 hours to read the original Egg thread you references, I guess I'll see you back here sometime midweek lol!

 

If you want another example of what may well be another dodgy DN please check out my Nationwide thread - again, any comments you have will be gratefully received!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

OK - today I have received a letter from Egg threatening legal action as they haven't been able to contact me (well - I've had no missed calls or answerphone messages so I guess they haven't actually tried) if we can't agree a repayment schedule.

 

There hasn't been any more correspondence since I last posted.

 

May I have some suggestions as to how to take this one forward?

 

I think the choices are;

 

1. Phone them and discuss a repayment plan :rolleyes:

 

2. Write and inform them that they are still in breach of my CCA request.

 

3. Write and inform them that they are still in breach of my CCA request and that whilst in breach they also issued a default notice, registered a default, terminated the account on the back of a defective DN (as the account was in dispute) and attempted to collect on the account whilst it is in dispute and finally threatened legal action whilst the account is still in dispute.

 

I'm leaning towards an "i'm confused" type of letter combined with number 2 above. Although I have to admit number 3 is rather tempting.

 

All suggestions and advice is gratefully received.

 

Thanks

SP

 

Any suggestions anyone?

 

Could anyone please give me some guidance as to which way to go with this at the moment? I'd really appreciate it.

 

(Mods - is it possible to alter the title of the thread to "Egg - valid CCA? Now Defaulted, Terminated and Legal Action Threatened" ?

 

Is there anyone on the night shift that can help with this please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bluffing aren't they ?

They've not complied with your cca request,issued a default notice ,terminated your account and now they want to discuss a payment plan !

I have an egg thread going as well and currently have my account in dispute,no doubt i'll hear from them soon. I just need to find a thread where egg have taken somebody to court and tried to enforce their cca,perhaps somebody can advise if that's happened and then we'll both find out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately blueotter, no they aren't bluffing - I think they think the law only applies selectively to them.

 

I'd prefer to avoid the hassle of having to defend legal action from them right now, even though I *think* I've a pretty good case due to a few health issues cuurently going on.

 

I think the easiest course of action right now is send the "erm, why are you threatening this when the account is in dispute and you have not complied with the CCA request" letter and save the other bits until later.

 

As to Egg CCA being enforcable, if you look towards the end of the thread "egg, what do I think is wrong with their agreement" I think you'll see that pt (one of the site team) has a case before the courts later on in the year to determine the validity of the agreements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in the same boat as you so i'll keep an eye on your thread, sure somebody else will be around tomorrow with some advice but i can't see what else people like me and you can do bar playing bat and ball with them. Just surprised that after terminating your account they now want to reach a payment plan agreement with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...