Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

charging order granted,what else they can do?...


111honey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5506 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all,

i have a loan and overdraft to natwest (26K) i offer 105 pound/month to shoosmith acting on behalf of natwest this is the amount i could afford to pay base on my income and expenditures,i am also on DMP.i continue to pay them although they refuse the offered amount until a charging order granted on oct 2008. ( i've been through a court process etc..) ii stopped paying them this feb 2009 as i dont have a written agreement that they accept that payment and they want me to continue to do so..today i received a letter saying that they require me a proposal for repayment of the amount outstanding i dont know what to do , i can only offer the same amount that i am paying before.please help

.

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are willing to pay £105 then pay it, whether they accept it or not.

 

you can make up your own income and exp sheet and send along a apyment of proposal of £105 and include £105 with the proposal and them state on hwat date and how you will be making future payments.

 

did you contest the charging order?

 

have you claimed back and unlaful charges on the natwest account?

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ida,

thanks.i did not do anything after the final CO was granted.i just continue my payment until this feb.regarding the claim i did not have any charges into my account but i would like to try a claim on ppi as this loan was a reconstruction of an old loan with ppi but i am not sure if that still possible? i will take your advise i wll send the offer to shoosmith and can i also ask about stopping the interest as long as i continue my payment?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ida,

thanks.i did not do anything after the final CO was granted.i just continue my payment until this feb.regarding the claim i did not have any charges into my account but i would like to try a claim on ppi as this loan was a reconstruction of an old loan with ppi but i am not sure if that still possible? i will take your advise i wll send the offer to shoosmith and can i also ask about stopping the interest as long as i continue my payment?

 

thanks

 

Why are they applying interest?

 

Was a judgment obtained before the CO.

 

Was the debt in your name only?

 

I suggest you make a full SAR.

 

 

 

Date ******

Subject Access Request (Data Protection Act 1998

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account Numbers:

 

As per the section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998, "Subject Access Request", I hereby request that you supply me with any and all historical data in your possession which, in any way appertains to me, including (but not exhaustively) a true copy of the original signed executed agreement; statements of account; duplicate statements and/or print outs of all account transactions; all internal and external correspondence sent or received by you including memo’s, logs, notes, screen prints and transcripts; notes of manual interventions such as telephone attendants' notes, internal and external emails; any other information held on any/all types of media in any relevant filing system (microfiche included). I should receive your full compliance within a maximum of 40 days of this letter being recorded as delivered by Royal Mail.

 

I enclose the statutory fee of £10 by way of a cheque and remind you that you have a total of 40 days in which to comply from the delivered date of this request.

 

May I confirm, as the ICO has already, that the 40 day time limit is not to be used as a guide for responding to the request but is the maximum period allowed in law and that whenever possible a data controller should proceed with all possible expediency in fulfilling such a Subject Access Request.

 

I await your timely responses

 

Yours faithfully

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi paul,

thanks for your help, the interest is 8% annual as mentioned in the court by the judge.yes there was a judgement obtained , and the debt is only in my name as well as the property. i did a big mistake on final CO hearing for not sending shoosmith a copy of all my request beforehand so the judge is not happy and granted CO without any attachment.thanks agai ,will send SAR tom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi paul,

thanks for your help, the interest is 8% annual as mentioned in the court by the judge.yes there was a judgement obtained , and the debt is only in my name as well as the property. i did a big mistake on final CO hearing for not sending shoosmith a copy of all my request beforehand so the judge is not happy and granted CO without any attachment.thanks agai ,will send SAR tom.

 

The judge is wrong. The court has no authority to award 8% interest post judgment.

Send the SAR off then we can see what's happening with your accounts.

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Gave My Defence On The Hearing ,my Payment Offer And I Also Asked To Stop The Interest But I Was Told By The Judge That I Should Give A Copy Of Those To Shoosmith Before THe Hearing Because Their Representative Can Not Decide On That and Should Inform Their Client First He Said they Are Entitled To An Interest. Who Can I Send The Sar Is It Natwest Or Shoosmith Soryy I Really Dont Know What To Do.thanks A Lot

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Gave My Defence On The Hearing ,my Payment Offer And I Also Asked To Stop The Interest But I Was Told By The Judge That I Should Give A Copy Of Those To Shoosmith Before THe Hearing Because Their Representative Can Not Decide On That and Should Inform Their Client First He Said they Are Entitled To An Interest. Who Can I Send The Sar Is It Natwest Or Shoosmith Soryy I Really Dont Know What To Do.thanks A Lot

 

Send to Natwest.

 

Have you a copy of your agreement?

Have you a copy of the judgment?

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont have the copy of the agrrement nor any docs for that loan ,yes i have a copy of the judgement.thanks

 

Could you scan and post it?

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi paul,

thank you sorry took me so long to reply as having problem with computer.anyway i dont have scanner i just write the judgement instead.

 

final charging order.

 

on 8 october 2008,District judge xxxxx

sitting at xxxx county court ,xxxx xxxx

heard the solicitor and the defendant in person and the court orders that

 

1. the charge created by the order made on the 21 aug 2008 shall continue.

2. the interest of the defendant in the asset described in the schedule below stand charged with payment of the sum of 25,771.17 the amount now owing under a judgement or order given on 18th april 2008 by the northampton county court bulk center in claim no. xxxxxxxx, together with any further interest becoming due and 208.00 pounds the cost of application.

3. the cost are to be added to the judgement debt.

 

the schedule

 

the address of the land or charged property is no. 4 xxxxxx. etc

 

 

thanks again.

ps. i would like to write to shoosmith to requst to consider stopping interest as long as i keep my monthly payment offer. what will n happen if they dont accept my offer? i am negative equity in my property.please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi paul,

On the 18th of April 2008 a Judgement or order given by Northampton County Court in Claim no. xxxxxxxxx,ordered the Defendant to pay money to the claimant a total of £ 26,110.00 or by instalment of £523.63 per month.

 

i filed an application for suspension of a warrant and/or Variation of an order (n245) on 2nd of May 2008. The proceedings was transferred to my local court ,xxxxxxxxxxx Court and a hearing was set on 24th of June 2008

 

the judge decision on this :

 

The Deputy District Judge Ward sitting at xxxxxxx county court at a hearing on 24th of June 2008 made the following orders.

• Judgement payable forthwith.

• The Defendant is to pay the cost in the sum of £ 88.13

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to butt in but I've had problems with shoosmiths trying to get them to respond to my subject access request sent to them in February. I think this lot like to refuse ones offer of reasonable repayments until they get the charging order rubber stamped in court, then they accept your original repayment proposals. If they can't provide me with copies of court documents etc. can I then challenge the original charging order albeit its about 4-5 years old?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...