Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Marcus will cut the rate on its easy-access savings account to 4.55% from Saturday - can you find better rates elsewhere?View the full article
    • Legal claim alleges Steam's market dominance means consumers are paying too much for video games.View the full article
    • In-person collaboration has been linked to high performance and job satisfaction, but these benefits don't increase with more days spent in the office.View the full article
    • We need to see the actual document from the IAS where it is written - "The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." You can't just type it up yourself. At the hearing in July or August or whenever the judge will have two Witness Statements. One from Bank's director says you never made a second appeal. You say you did make a second appeal and the IAS concluded that payment was made. The judge will immediately twig that either you or the director is lying.  But who? Fail to show the documentation form the IAS and instead just produce something you've typed yourself will make it look like you just made up the appeal and you are lying and you will lose the case. Please let us see what the IAS adjudicator sent.
    • I used to have a retail outlet in London selling my husband's photography.  We also had a co-op with staff so they weren't directly employed by me, but I paid for the other overheads etc.  When my husband died, I carried on as usual for a while but then I became ill and moved quite far away so logistically was becoming very difficult.  I came to an arrangement (verbal) with one of the guys I trusted, that I would send him the images to print and sell as normal, and I wouldn't take any money, as a short term solution until I got back on my feet and worked out the best way to do things. He would pay all the  rent, insurance etc... Over a year later, not able to give things away for free anymore,  I drew up a contract as a wholesale agreement, so I would get everything printed and sent to him and I would invoice his for what he ordered. I noticed form the beginning that he wasn't ordering enough or frequently enough to be making any money, and was suspicious he was doing his own orders on the sly and ordering just enough from me to keep my happy.  I checked with my printer, which I've been with for 20 years, and he sad he wasn't getting orders for my images from anyone else. I emailed a few other printers to ask them to keep a look out for some images but I soon realised this would be impossible to police.  The only option really would be to buy a print from him and check the stamp on the back of it.  I finally managed to get hold of on the prints on sale, and sure enough, he did not order it through me.   In the contract he signed in 2022 it explicitly states that he must destroy all files I had previously sent him etc etc so e is in breach of that.  When I drew up the contract, I was careful to make sure it was legally binding, but before I let rip at him, I need to know where I stand.  The contract is here: PARTIES This WHOLESALE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made effective as of 30th June, 2022, by and between ############################## The Supplier and the Client, collectively referred to as the "Parties," hereby agree to the following terms: TERMS AND CONDITIONS SALES OF GOODS The Supplier agrees to provide the following goods to the Client (“Goods”): Description of Goods ################################# Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b BOTH PARTIES AGREE: The Client purchases the Goods through the Supplier directly, and agrees to delete/destroy any previously held digital images (Goods) owned by the Supplier, and agrees not to use any such files for monetary gain, outside of this agreement, either directly or through a third party from immediate effect of this agreement. The Client purchases the other materials necessary for resale of the Goods independently of this agreement. The Client shall have exclusive rights for resale of Goods at ###########, and also with permission, as a retailer of the Goods elsewhere, provided that there is no conflict of interest between the Supplier and the Client. The Client is free to decide their own retail prices, for the Goods. The Supplier shall use #####  to provide the printed Goods on Fujifilm Crystal Archive paper, with Lustre finish, and will not use any other Printer unless #### cease to trade, without prior approval from the Client. The Supplier shall not impose restrictions on size or frequency of orders made by the Client. The prices provided by the Supplier shall not increase for a minimum of 3 years, unless the prices of the raw materials rise, in which case the client will be informed immediately. Any discounts/promotional prices of raw materials shall be passed on to the Client by the Supplier, and the invoice will show adjustments for this, as well as credit for return postage of any damaged goods. This agreement can be terminated by the Client without notice; the Supplier must give notice of no less than 90 days, unless the terms of the agreement are breached, in which case, the agreement can be terminated with immediate effect. PAYMENT Orders must be paid for upon receipt of invoice, via Bank transfer: ######### Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b DELIVERY AND INSPECTIONS All orders received by 12.00am (midnight) shall be processed by the Supplier the following working day and delivery of order shall arrive in accordance with the Royal Mail schedule, or DPD, should express delivery be requested. The Client shall be liable for the delivery charge which shall be added to the invoice. The Goods will be delivered to the address specified by the Client. The Client shall be provided with order tracking, and should any problems arise with the ordering system or the couriers (Royal Mail, DPD), the Client shall be informed without delay of any such issues. The Client will inspect the Goods and report any defects or damage to the Goods in transit as soon as possible upon receipt of Goods, and will retain damaged Goods for return to Supplier for refund/replacement. GENERAL PROVISIONS CONFIDENTIALITY The prices of the Goods and other information contained in this Agreement is confidential and will not be disclosed by either party unless with prior written consent of the other party. INDEMNIFICATION The Client indemnifies the Supplier from any claims, liabilities, and expenses made by any third party vendors or customers of the Client. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with UK Law. ACCEPTANCE Both parties understand and accept the wholesale arrangement stipulated under this Agreement. Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this Wholesale Agreement as of the day and year set forth above.   Signed by us both electronically.   I haven't broached any of this yet, and I am looking for some advice about what action to take.  The main issue I've got is that he has still go those images.  If I terminate the contract, I will need to know that he no longer has those images and I can't think of a bulletproof way to do this. I'm thinking I might tell him I will continue with the contract but ask for a  sum in damages and say that if I find out he's still doing it down the line I will terminate the contract and sue him for damages. The damages side of things I'm not sure how it would work as he is self employed, and I'm positive he doesn't declare all of his earnings to HMRC, in order to find out how much I have lost, would the court demand to go through his tax self assessments?  I'm not sure how to proceed with this, I don't want to lose that place as an outlet as it is in a prime spot in London, which is why I let him have those images in the first place as I would have had to pull out altogether at that point.  I am regretting it somewhat now though.  Please help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i reported a brake in last year and told the police that the log books for the vans had been taken but could not prove who it was so the police could not do anything but when the bailiff turned up at this guys work he gave the bailiff the stolen log books

 

Had you changed the logbooks into your own name/ company name?

 

Can you prove that the log books were stolen?

 

Can you prove that the bailiff got them from this person?

 

If so, have you considered making a complaint in writing to the Chief Constables office.

 

I know I say this from time to time, and to my knowledge, no one from here has ever done that, but it is the only way to ensure that the police actually do their job in difficult cases where they'd really rather be doing something else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yes the vans have been changed over and i have both sets of keys

i can prove that he took them because he has shown them to the cowboy that took the vans,

but all i got was this is a sival matter

i have got the email address for the cheif inspector i could try that?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the vans have been changed over and i have both sets of keys

i can prove that he took them because he has shown them to the cowboy that took the vans,

but all i got was this is a sival matter

 

If he knew they were not the property of the debtor then that is theft.

 

Chief Con. start at the top

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wil try and explain a little better

 

jan 08 i was looking to buy a (firm) in the first meeting with the owner he told me it had around £42000 debt.

we came to an agreement that i would pay off the debt as payment for the (firm) in the contract it included 2 vans and a fork lift truck and a little bit of stock.

when i got in there the old book keeper stayed with us for around two months but when i started going deeper in to the accounts somthing was not right the numbers did not add up,so i called the book keeper in to my office and asked what was going on he was told at that point that if he was to lie to me i would sack him on the spot,and this is what he told me he said that the old owner had told him to fiddle the accounts before i got there to show £42000 debt and to hide this also from the vat as he was under an inspection so i asked him in is opinion how much debt he thought there realy was he said around £80.000 but this still did not add up.

so i spen the next two months looking in to everything(bear in mind i had now paid £42000 off of his debt so i now was the owner of the two van and F.L.T)

at the end of my own invetigation i found that the credtor debt was £130.000+ inland rev £13.200 vat £8.000+and bank over draft £15.000

and credit card debt £112.000.

i also found that he had got all the debt putting his house as security as told by creditors but just found out that he is a tennent and it is not his

had this confirmed by the (landlord)

i set up a payment plan with inland rev to date paid over £5.000

sep 08 i was called by police to say my alarm was going off at my office

when i got there the alarm told me that somebody had been in through the main door but i had changed the alarm code then we found that the log books and the purches contract for the (firm) had gone so we called the police to tell them what had gone but we could not prove it was the old owner (another brick wall) anyway oct 08 we had paid over £72.000

off his old debt but we could not carry on so we closed and all we had was the two vans,we then got a letter from I.R saying we owed another £8000 when i told them in wrighting what was going on thay said that thay had not got the letter but (bad luck) i sent it recorded and it had been sighned for, the day after thay told me it had been taken by the fraud department, and the next day thay phoned to tell me thay had looked in to this and was going to refund every penny i had paid (bonus)thay have done just that.in all this we had death threats from this guy and told to keep our mouth shut so we had to move home as we have two small children at the same time he was charged with assault on one of my employees so we knew he meant what he said.

in feb 09 a bailiff came to our house and my friends son opened the door and he told the child that he was taking the vans he told the bailif that thay had stuff on them as we was in the middle of moving he told that child who as it happens is bisabled (blind)if he did not unload the vans within two mins he would take them anyway he called me on my mobile and he was told he could not unload the vans as i had the key (and he is blind) i told him i was just around the corner so he said dont worry i will keep them here until you get here when i got there no vans and this child had been left outside crying iin the garden he said i told them to wait hear he then rang them to find where thay were and i told them to wait until i got to them and when i asked the driver why he set off before i got there he said i was told to by the bailif when i went back the bailiff said dont worry thay wont go out of north wales but yet again this was a lie the vans were now at the other side of lancashire

we have sent sherforce log books how we paid for the vans and we have the keys the insurence from the last six months in my name and even a latter from the lieing B---urd that had me over telling that the the van with all the things on was ours i then got another letter from inland rev (a bill)with a tax code that i did not know when i called them the fraudster had given the tax office my home address for his own personel tax bill that said just bin it as thay now knew what this guy was trying on

when the guy broke in and took the contract (clever)not so it was a coppy inland revinue had my original coppy that is why i got my money back when i spoke to a local solicitor he told me he knew this man and he was known for doing this type of thing and his nikname for him was the famous company liquedator as this was his tenth one he knew about.

 

hope this helps sorry a bit complex

i have all the documented evidence to prove all i have said this is why it is so frustrating

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

good I'm glad a form 4 complaint is going to be done these bailiffs have no right to hold a license for doing that to a blind child

and when they do lose there licence i hope they end up with a mountain of debt they cannot pay and a very nasty bailiff comes knocking on there door

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what the bookkeeper has said it seems to me that you are also a victim of fraud, not to mention the threats of violence. Have you reported them to the police?

 

Please keep all information on the thread as it helps others to help you, and may also help other people.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

up date

phoned police again to demand to speak to cheif inspector called back within 5 mins to inform me that C.I.D are now taking the case over (bonus because last week thay told me it was not a police matter) but after comment from chris600uk and another person told me it was yesturday hope you read this

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

police are not bad it seems that every time i speek to them thay always tell me thay have heard this kind of thing before and it wont get past the C.P.S and it seems like thay dont want to do anything because thay are held back by the C.P.S, so what is the point, (but thats not always in the public interest) i actualy feel sorry for police offices spending days on one case to be told its not good enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes getting as much help as i can, need it right now never dealt with bailiffs at this scale hopefully thay know just how bad it is, lost the lot

but feel just as bad towards sherforce and the **** bag that calls himself a high, old on he did tell me he was a high court officer and worked for the court is that not impersonation of an official, if so he said this on cctv in front of a police officer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't feel too bad for the police... If they present a good case, the CPS will then find it more difficult to justify refusing to prosecute. If they don't bother, the CPS have it easy.

 

Remember who has to gain from no prosecution, and who loses..

 

We have laws for a reason, and as imperfect as any system is if you don't fight for your rights, some lying thieving politician will take them away - because they are inconvenient to him/her at the time.

 

Don't give up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand you are recieving help on this ?

 

 

:confused: What help ?

Can you tell us ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

up date

well guys going to interpleader in two weeks list of things to tell the master

 

1, no I D

2,talking to a child who is disabled

3,telling this child to empty the vans

4,taking the vans with our tools on

5,taking the vans with our furnitchure on after thay was told

6,not giving any warrent

7,leaving us unable to work

and so on, too long to go on, hope this works

 

thanks yall

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus this is shocking tom tubbys help needed on this one

stupid question from me but cant you file a form 4 complaint about the bailiffs

 

You are quite right, this is a shocking situation.

 

Until a few days ago we had an agreement that the vehicles and contents would be released but then a 3rd party claim was found to have been made which has meant that this matter will have to wait to be decided at the Interpleader hearing in 2 weeks...

 

Very INTERESTING to see whether the 3rd party will make an appearance!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...