Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you BankFodder. I will do as you suggest to get everything in writing first and will construct the letter of claim over the weekend. Is it best to use the format for the letter of claim as the one on this website? Lastly, did I read the judgement correctly for the Farooq judgement as its not quite clear to me which act I am covered best by?
    • A letter of claim can't be served by email as per CPR 6.3 unless you've specifically told them. Also can't give you 7 days to pay, they've got to give at least 14 days. They know this, they're just hoping you wet yourself and cough up. This won't be going anywhere. IGNORE.
    • Good Morning, I received a speeding ticket last December, I had requested further information from the ticket office which they provided, I also sent back the form confirming i was the diver at the time, however, i had overlooked the signature at the bottom of the page, nobody from the ticket office got back in touch to mention this and i was trying to book a course with no luck, I got in touch with them and sent them a screenshot showing them I was unable to book the course, they came came back to me and said we have no documents to say you were the driver (they did they just failed to mention I never signed it) they re sent the form and it was over the 120 days, i had mentioned to them previously that the timeframe was coming up and they would need to extend this. They are now saying they have complied legally and i need to accept the 3 points, I am trying to plead my case and I am tempted to let this go to court and provide the evidence of my constant communication on the matter. has anyone got any experience with this? TIA.
    • Thank you. I'm looking into it at the moment.  Straight away it says last sold in 2007. Thank you every one for all your help. It's much appreciated. 
    • Just on bankfodder's final point above. The Title Register you get online for £3 can't legally be used as proof of ownership for the property. Right now they'll suffice to see if there's an asset there. Should you need to use it in court to say he's trading at that address, you'll need to fill out an OC1 form with HM Land Registry to get an official copy in the post, which costs £7.00. Make sure that you get the Title Register, not the Title Plan! Title Register will tell you who owns the property etc while the Title Plan will tell you the property boundaries etc which isn't relevant in this case.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The new stat holiday entitlement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5500 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if someone could help me here.

 

DH's holiday entitlement always was 24 days + 8 BH, so the new change makes no difference in how many days he gets.

 

However, his employers are trying to say that now, everybody has to work BH if they're so rostered as BH are part of the holiday entitlement and they therefore have to apply to have the BH off if they want it like they would do for normal holidays.

 

Now, DH is maintenance but helps covering the rush hour on platform. As maintenance, he doesn't work weekends and BHs. But because of the change, he's now been rostered to work both Good Friday and Easter Monday and he isn't happy. :-(

 

I reckon his employers are pulling a fast one and fully intend to challenge that, but thought I'd throw it to the crowd here for discussion before I fire off one of my infamous missives.

 

Opinions, comments?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bookie, what does his contract of employment say about working bank holidays? is there a clause in it which says he may be required to work alternative hours depending on the needs of the business? (or something like that).

 

How much notice has he been given about this?

 

Ell

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bank and public holidays can be included by an employer in the statutory maximum holiday entitlement of 5.6 weeks (pro rated from 1st April 2009 dependant on employer holiday year). However if your OH's contract states that his holiday entitlement is 24 days + 8 bank/public holidays then his employer cannot enforce his bank holiday working unless:

 

1. There is a clause in his existing contract stating that he may be required to work these days if business needs demands.

2. A new contract has been accepted or deemed to have been accepted through working practice, and you OH was consulted about these changes 90 days prior to the change taking place.

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I was wondering if someone could advise me on some issues that a friend is experiencing at the moment-

 

My friend has been working for her company for 22 months. After 4 months of starting, she was then asked to work at another site and as such the staffing levels were different and this mean that due to the operation there were some bank holidays that she was not needed and therefore asked to "stand down". Now her initial thoughts were that she did not want to lose pay as she has during this 18 months been working (as requested by manager) to work 12 hours a day Monday to Friday. However she did receive pay for these stand downs and if she didn't she chased up the matter with her manager who would then authorise payment. In effect, for some bank holidays she did not work she got stand down pay and for those bank holidays she did work she was payed double rate. Now in her profession she does get paid for full 12 hours so no deduction is made for lunch breaks.

 

Based on the fact she has for 18 months been working Monday to Friday at MINIMUM 60 hour week (with no variations and does this total does NOT include overtime hours) and she has a written contract stating "holiday entitlement is in accordance with Working Time Regulations" I ask you all how the following can occur...

 

1) Her employer firstly has never communicated any reference to changes in holiday entitlement increase whether by verbal / written communication since what she has discovered was from October 2007! How can they now stop this stand down pay?

 

2) Although I have seen some of her wage slips showing previous holiday payments being paid at 12 hours per shift, why has she been verbally advised in the last 3 weeks that she will now only be getting paid for 11.2 hours per work day as apposed to the full 12 hours? (Every web site I have checked for her states that a person paid for 60 hours a week minimum and over a period (hers being 18 months) should be getting full 12 hours pay. So how can her employer change this payment? She has since (last few days) received a wage slip show reduced payment to her holiday pay!

 

3) Interestingly, when I looked at her wage slips, sometimes the wage slips show a BASIC PAY figure (60.00 x hourly rate) and other payslips simply state ADDNLHRS (60.00 x hourly rate)

 

FInally, she and her collegues are paid every two weeks but one of them has not been paid (as of Friday) for 6 weeks now due to someones errors but not that of the supervisor who has tried desperately to resolve the matter but to no avail. WHat options do you think should be taken?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...