Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Red Castle Recoveries / Smile


wUK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5474 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Smile are in default of my CCA request (as of Dec 2008) yet I am now receiving letters from Red Castle Recoveries in relation to my credit cards.

 

I have ignored the first letters they sent but they have now sent "NOTICE OF HOME VISIT" letters.

 

I sent Smile a default letter stating:

 

  • You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.
  • You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.
  • You may not pass the account to a third party.
  • You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.
  • You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

So they have unlawfully passed my details to Red Castle.

 

Is there a template letter I can use to send to Red Castle with regards to this?

 

Any legal references available with regards to this would also be beneficial.

-- wUK --

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a good one:

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

Dear Sir or Madam,

Account number: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

 

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to yourselves, as it is in dispute with the **original creditor** and has been since DATE.

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the Data Protection Act 1998, the Banking Code and the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

As **original creditor** are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, and have also breached s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the **original creditor** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as **DCA** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

If **DCA** chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action. Please also note that any debt collector attending my premises will be removed, if necessary by the police.

 

After taking advice, I am also of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines

 

I hope that the foregoing will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing informing me that this matter is now closed. I would also request that you resist the temptation to send me any more of your standard template letters.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Remember, don't sign it

 

send recorded

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I sent the above letter to Red Castle by recorded delivery but today received a "Notice of intended court action" from "Resolution Legal Services" (part of the Gothia Group which Red Castle is also a part of).

 

They have completely ignored my account in dispute letter and are still trying to enforce this debt - Smile never replied to my CCA request or my default letter back in December 2008 so this has been in dispute for some time now!

 

What should I send in reply as my previous correspondence has clearly fallen on deaf ears?

-- wUK --

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine, they tend to ignore everything, as long as you have proof that you sent the request and proof that they received it, you have a full defnece to any court action they may believe that they can get away with.

 

You should however start to complain to TS, OFT, FSA etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

I have had a very similar experience recently with Red Castle too (although with Home Learning College not Smile). I have requested a copy of CCA and amount owing in detail from Red, who have not responded other than to threaten court action if I didnt pay. The same day I received a letter from Resolution Legal Services which was dated the same as Red's last letter! informing me of court action. I today sent a copy of letter to Red requsting CCA to Resolution via fax, but their number isnt valid. I telephoned the number on Resolutions headed paper and someone answered with "Simon from Red can I help you" I asked him to clarify and he said it was Red recoveries. I have been worried sick about this and feel that they are bullying me, I have disputed the amount owing under the CCA as the HLC did not provide the service or materials promised, (unfair relationship) I paid for 18months and have paid over £1200, but they say I still owe another £625 as it was a 2 year agreement. Any advice on what I can do when they send me a CCJ ?? I dont want this to affect my credit and they are bullying me into paying them, which I cannot do.

 

:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cg77

 

I'm assuming you sent your CCA request by recorded delivery.

 

I would think by now your credit rating will have been well and truly screwed by these people so if they threaten you with court-let em!

 

While they are in default of your LEGAL request they can do nothing until they comply.

If they went to court, you have a full defence

 

Before the debt was taken on by red, did you receive a default notice and a Notice of Assignment. If not then Red Castle shouldn't even be claiming anything off you

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont remember receiving one of those! The only worry I have is I signed the CCA for 24 months but have only paid 18months as they broke their agreement with unfair relationship and not providing the services. Red Castle were someone else before and they said the original loan was through them (i think) as the loan was interest free via the college, but both are ignoring my requests and its getting very worrying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in a similar position with Red Castle/Gothia/Resolution regarding the Home Learning College. You would think they would have no problem producing a CCA.

 

I have my original one in front of me and as far as I can make out it wouldnt be enforceable. They have never sent me a 'proper' letter advising of the Assignment of the alleged debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so pleased I looked on here, was beginning to think it was just me. Was your HLC agreement with Red Castle or the company before them? whats the notice of assignment thingy I am so green!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so pleased I looked on here, was beginning to think it was just me. Was your HLC agreement with Red Castle or the company before them? whats the notice of assignment thingy I am so green!

 

The HLC agreement was with Aqueus Finance before HLC folded (as they do on a regular basis) and then allegedly sold on to Red Castle Recoveries.

 

To keep it legal they should have sent you a notice of assignment which should have been set by recorded delivery otherwise they could never prove you received it;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they didnt they just started ringing me constantly at really horrid times, like 7am on a saturday and sunday morning and late at night, and I used this site from then really, using a template to send them letter asking not to pester me via telephone but to correspond by letter. Now they are threatening me with court action, although that company doesnt actually exist!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I sent the following to "Resolution legal Services" after receiving their court action threat:

The attached letter was sent to Red Castle Recoveries via recorded delivery on X April 2009. As stated in my letter to Red Castle Recoveries this matter is in dispute with the Cooperative Bank/Smile and has been since X December 2008.

I also advised that by passing my information to them (and now to Resolution Legal Services) not only is a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the Data Protection Act 1998, the Banking Code and the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

Furthermore I advised Red Castle Recoveries that continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines; I take your letter dated X April 2009 as such pursuit and will therefore file reports with the appropriate authorities.

 

Any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS and I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

I now require that you inform me in writing that this matter is now closed.

 

This letter has also been ignored and I have now been sent a letter demanding payment and threatening me with an SD leading to a bankruptcy petition!

 

What can we do about these?

-- wUK --

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had my letter from Resolution which informed me of court action if I didnt pay. I sent a copy of the letter I had sent to Red requsting CCA, to Resolution via fax, but their number wasnt valid. I telephoned the number on Resolutions headed paper and someone answered with "Simon from Red can I help you" I asked him to clarify and he said it was Red recoveries!!!:confused:

 

They then agreed to take my account from Resolution whilst it was under dispute. They have since sent me my CCA, although this is still in question as the provider of the service I paid for did not deliver what they should have and are denying that they offered me a lower price (hence why I have stopped paying) for a different product.

 

I have this week, sent them a final offer letter to hopefully sort this problem out, but its making me ill with worry, so any advice from anyone, especially if you have had dealings with these people, would be appreciated.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...