Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
    • Hello all, just got this from my bank today.   ” Update on your payment refund As you know we temporarily refunded the amount(s) of £381.98 to your account pending investigation. We’re pleased to confirm that an additional amount of £359.99 has also been refunded to your account by the retailer on 18th March 2024. What will happen next To correct this situation, arrangements will be made on 6th June 2024 to reverse the original refund supplied from us.  Our file in respect of this matter will now be closed, which we trust is satisfactory.”   Not sure what to do as I was previously told if I hear nothing back after a certain date that would be the case closed now it’s been changed to the 6th of June. and as you see I’m not getting a full refund I don’t know wether to contact them again and try to get the £20, or if I even can at this point? Thanks again.   
    • Is your current mental health causing you to apply negative thinking? If the answer is yes, then you should get some advice. The following website link enables free mental health support. https://atw.maximusuk.co.uk/?utm_campaign=EMP-ATW-B2C-B2B-leadgen &utm_medium=PPC Google Text&utm_source=Paid Seach&utm_term=maximus mental health&
    • So even if they do repair it in time, you still need to get a marquee etc? If they don't repair it in time, you have to find a new venue? I'm confused?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESILE VS Sky card


cupcake68
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5177 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can someone please advise me on this CCA received today from Skycard. I'm new to all this and don't know much but I think it is not classed as a true agreement because all it is is my application form and also it doesn't have their signature on it. Am I heading in the right direction?

 

Thanks so much for any advice!

 

SKY pictures by cupcake62 - Photobucket

Link to post
Share on other sites

As such, they do not strictly "sign" the agreement as such - a stamp will suffice.

 

Also, an application form can be made enforceable by the courts if it contains the prescribed terms.

 

Sadly for you, in my opinion, this is one of the above.

 

Others may have a different view.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone please advise me on this agreement.

 

I am trying to understand these agreements and Supasnooper has advised this one has all the right terms etc on it, so I am not looking for faults, just trying to understand so when I get the next one I might know what to look out for.

 

Under the address box it says "In condition 1 we have set out some special meanings we have given to words in this agreement." Am I blind? I cannot see condition 1. Should there be another piece of paper? I know this isn't enough to be unenforceable I am just trying to understand what is written.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to presume that condition 1 is directly under where they have said that.......not enough to make it unenforceable, so I would go with the letter posted above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

This account was sold to Barclaycard some months ago.

 

I have not missed any payments since discovering this was an enforceable agreement.

 

As soon as it became a Barclaycard account they put a stop on my card due to my other barclaycard acct being in dispute and unpaid.

 

I am now wondering if I should CCA them again?

 

Have Barclaycard learnt their lesson and purchased the agreements along with the account?

 

Will I be wasting my time?

 

Thanks for the advice

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just taken this quote from Diddydicky on a different thread....

 

i also have noted that the creditor is required to issue a default notice under s87 (d) when he seeks to restrict use of the account or withdraw benefits such as for instance reducing the limit or putting a stop on further use of the card

 

and how many times do they actually use s87(d) to do that??

 

Should they have issued me with a DN because they were puting a "temporary suspension on my card due to the situation with my other account"?

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Just taken this quote from Diddydicky on a different thread....

 

i also have noted that the creditor is required to issue a default notice under s87 (d) when he seeks to restrict use of the account or withdraw benefits such as for instance reducing the limit or putting a stop on further use of the card

 

and how many times do they actually use s87(d) to do that??

 

Should they have issued me with a DN because they were puting a "temporary suspension on my card due to the situation with my other account"?

 

Cupcake

 

Sorry to be a pain!

 

I am trying to be patient but I would really appreciate some advice on this post?

 

Thank you

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...