Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • an that - it seems to be the poop approach We have reduced inflation massively err from the massive amount we caused it to rise too We will give pensioners a tiny smidgen back - of the much much larger amount we've already ripped them off We will reduce some taxes a tiny amount.. from the record amount we have raised it too and reduce services twice as much  to pay for our VIPals extravagances the list goes on   Even their smears are feeble Wet Sunak dribbles over his own feet and needs his pals pretending to be 'real people to ask questions,  while Starmer regularly plays 5 a side Raynor pays her bills, while Tories sell taxpayer funded second houses at a profit - no doubt routed through tax avoidance schemes
    • I'd say concern about the landfill operator is absolutely necessary. I think the word they could mean is 'embarrassing'.
    • Just to cover yourself, you should write them a letter in response telling them that you are rejecting their offer. That they know full well that their insurance is an attempt to limit or exclude liability contrary to section 57 Consumer rights act and is a secondary contract contrary to section 72.  By the way was the offer made without prejudice or in confidence or anything? Maybe you could post up their offer here please
    • "Dear HR, I refer to my correspondence of *date* in which I challenged xxx, copy attached. Clearly this was a grievance, and yet does not seem to have been heard under the grievance procedure. I am exceptionally dismayed that this 'review'. which never took place, seems to be being used as a criteria in redundancy selection proceedings. As this is time critical, please advise asap."            
    • Just to update, received a revised offer of £75 from P2G after they got my LOC last Friday. They stated that because it was not insured this would be their final offer. Looks like we are going to court.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Provident have ruined my credit report


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5547 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I will try to keep this short and brief. I took a £100 loan out with provident last year 2008 and paid it on time every week. Back in September 08 my agent stopping coming around for payment. I received a letter from provident head office on November 08 telling me i had falling behind with payments. I rang them immediately and explained that no one had come round to collect payment since September. They said not to worry and that they would sort it out. January 2009 i received another letter saying they would pass my default details over to credit reference agencies if i did not bring the account up to date. Again, i was back on the phone explaining what had happened, they gave me the option to bring the account back up to date(£42 arrears) over the phone with my debit card, i refused. I told them that this was their fault and that i was more than happy to to repay the amount borrowed provided that they sent someone out every week to collect payment.

 

Well, I have registered for the month free trial with Experian only to find provident have tarnished my report with a score of 5 (5mths missed payment=£60 arrears),completely destroyed my credit report and score.

 

I contacted Experian and they basically told me that there was nothing they could do, and that i would be better off going to the citizens advice. Citizens advice have told me that provident are well within their rights.

 

I realize that i have probably shot myself in the foot here by refusing to pay the £42, however i believed i was in the right and i was not going to give in to their bullying tactics.

 

My concern is, will these 5 points be removed from my credit report if i pay the rest of the loan off in full immediately.

 

Any help and advice would be most appreciated.

Edited by Bailey03
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

My concern is, will these 5 points be removed from my credit report if i pay the rest of the loan off in full immediately.

 

Any help and advice would be most appreciated.

 

hi bailey, i believe that even if you pay the full amount the payment markers will remain. Monthly payment markers are normally not removed even if you pay the full amount.

 

However I would write to them and clearly state that the contract you had with them was broke by them not collecting and if they do not remove it you will make a complaint to the Information comissioners office. You might have to fight to get them to remove the markers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bailey,

 

i am in dispute with provident also and have been sending letters of complaints since January this year, my agent took it upon herself to mark off payments each week to suit herself , the head office are not at all helplful my complaint has now gone off to the Information comissioners office, this is the only things affecting my credit file

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...