Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt Management Plan Dispute2


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I wonder if anyone can help me with this one. I’ve been a member of Payplan since May 2005 and have been advised by them to quit my membership (which I did today), as I’m about to go into dispute with my creditors, regarding further payments to them, ie added interests/fees. Please see the following, briefly outlining what I more, or less, wrote in my first thread:

 

“It's regarding a debt management repayment plan that I've been making to my creditors, via Payplan, between May 2005, to be completed by November 2008 (£12507.97 of debt to start with).

 

Presently I’ve been paying £296.05 pcm and last October, I only had £598.85 to pay off (approximately two more payments left). However, due to added interests/fees, my creditors are refusing to write off the accumulated debts of a further total of £2065.56, (insisting that I should continue to pay up until August 2009) while Payplan informed me that it's not within their power to get them to write it off, even though I was reassured by their customer services staff (before joining and during my early membership) that they can negotiate with my creditors for all my final payments to be written off or for it to be reduced by 80%.

 

I've since cancelled my standing order about three weeks ago, since I feel that I have more than paid off my creditors, long before joining Payplan (I've always paid on time and never missed a payment until now). I also feel that the creditors are very greedy and just want to cling onto me for as long as they possibly can. Already I’ve received my first threatening letter from one of them today and I’m sure I’ll soon be hearing from the other ones. In any case, I’m still
sticking to my guns
as I feel that what they’re doing is unfair/unjust."

I did seek out legal advice, but cannot afford the solicitor’s fees. I enquired about getting legal aid, but I don’t qualify as my salary, although it’s basic, would place me under the private clients' category since I have no dependents to pay out to, or own my own property. I’ve since been advised to try the Law Centre to see what they can do. I hope this information is helpful to you and thank you for taking the time to read it.

:confused::Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could send a SAR to each of your creditors which will cost £10 & they would have 40 days to comply. Among the things you should get back would be a copy of your agreement which if you scan and remove identifying details & then post up here we will be able to tell whether it is enforceable or not. Also you should receive back a list of all the charges which have been added with a view to reclaiming back those which are unfair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If these debts are for catalogues, credit cards or loans it may be quicker to send a CCA request. This will cost a pound & should be sent recorded delivery, they would have 12+2 days to respond to your request. If they failed to respond or produced an enforceable agreement within that time period you can then send an 'In Dispute' letter and withold any further payments as the account would in effect be frozen until the dispute was resolved.

 

If it was an overdraft you would have to send the SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

also get a SAR from payplan.in their notes it may say they agreed to do the write off for you at some point.sounds to me like they are now removing themselves from their statement about this.remember they are paid from your creditors for a % of the money you pay, so they prob dont want to do anything which rocks the boat.

 

obviously do the CCA requests anyway, but these guys also say they will do stuff and dont.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both for your help and, Wangster, I totally agree with you about Payplan trying to remove themselves from their statement - in fact they did claim in their final report, (sent out to me and FOS). that none of their staff had mentioned anything about writing off the remaining debts.

 

If it came to the crunch where I had no choice but to pay up, ie if the creditors take me to court and win the case, could I still send in the cca and the SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...