Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ABBEY/MBNA Agreement is it enforcable?


LG29
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5535 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

hi,

in my opinion, no.

 

I am not an expert but it says application form and just under that it says if you need help filling in this application form.

 

So, i quess, its an application form.

 

please see this,

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/162851-consumer-credit-agreements-guide.html

 

originaly posted by steven 4067

 

hope this helps:)

 

originaly posted by

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to disagree brindles. It is one of those application forms which include all the prescribed terms.......

 

The document will be front and back therefore your signature appears with four corners of the prescribed terms.

 

I would say enforceable - sorry to be the bearer of bad news :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

thanks again clemma for stepping in.

 

I will stop giving my opinion on agreements and stick to advising on sending SAR and CCA requests.

 

I thought the above showed two seperate documents(sorry).

just trying to do my bit for those with 0 replies..

 

thank you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

thanks again clemma for stepping in.

 

I will stop giving my opinion on agreements and stick to advising on sending SAR and CCA requests.

 

I thought the above showed two seperate documents(sorry).

just trying to do my bit for those with 0 replies..

 

thank you:)

 

Why stop giving advice? I have made mistakes before, but learnt from them!!! The only reason I know it to be one document is because it doubles up as the envelope to send it back in!

 

However, it looks like a microfiche copy, so they may not have the original......that could only be tested in court though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi clemma

 

I think that peice of paper purporting to be an application form is the same as a virgin mailer application form, i dont beleive the terms were on the original because that would mean when you send the application back to them the prescribed terms would be on the outside of the envelope, i know MBNA are not the sharpest tools in the rack but i dont think even they would put terms on the outside so everyone new there would be personal information inside.

 

I have one myself and i believe the terms have been pasted on, its unenforceable IMO.

 

GG

Edited by guzzleguts
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, that's a different story then :) Is it worth the OP sending the following letter then:

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

RE: Agreement/Account number

 

Thank you for your response to my letter dated xxxxxx 2009, making a formal request for a true copy of the original credit agreement for the above account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79).

 

The documents you supplied me appear to be no more than an application form, and as such are not a satisfactory response to my request. Nowhere on the front of the document is there any reference to the prescribed terms and conditions that such an agreement must contain. I must assume that these are unconnected documents and once again inadequate to satisfy your obligations.

 

As you are aware you are obliged to provide me with a true copy of my agreement as defined under Section 189 of the CCA 1974. and I consider that you have failed to comply with my request for these documents

 

 

Under the terms of the above Act, a creditor has 12 working days to provide the requested documents. This deadline has now passed and I have not received the requested documents from you.

 

As I am sure you are aware, an agreement that does not contain all of the prescribed terms, and/or is not signed by the debtor, is completely unenforceable & I therefore consider that this account is in dispute with immediate effect & it follows that all payments to this account are suspended forthwith.

 

I draw your attention to the legal requirement that a creditor is not permitted to take any action against an account whilst it remains in dispute. The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and therefore the following applies:

You must not demand any payment on this account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

You must not add any further interest or charges to this account.

You must not pass this account to any third party.

You must not register any information in respect of this account with any of the credit reference agencies.

You must not issue a default notice on this account

I hereby give you notice that if you proceed with any of the above actions, I will file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi clemma, didnt mean to butt in on this thread its only because i have one myself.

 

I dont think the dispute letter will work, as far as they are concerned the prescribed terms are there, and they have complied with the cca request as far as section 77-78 is concerned.

 

I have not sent them a letter as they have left me alone with this account, and as i have 2 other court cases going on i have not rocked the boat.

 

Now its up to LG29, personally i would send a letter outlining the fact that their effort of an application form come agreement with prescribed terms on the outside of an envelope, is a joke, and if that is the document they are going to enforce for this alleged debt. If they do i think the INFORMATION COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE may like to know about these application form's.

 

As soon as i have time il be sending something along that line to them( or if they start to hassle me, then it will be earlier)

 

Thanks GG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your replies, when I firstsaw this I thought it was unenforcable, but then saw the back, if it is the back of it,there is nothing about default charges, but they would be inT&C,which I havent seen i did write back to them saying that what they sent wasnt sufficent, waiting for their reply.

am I right in thinking that they need to have the original signed agreement, if this goes to court, and if they produced a copy of the agreement,it would be thrown out.

Thanks everyone for all your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this post by PT on the thread All MBNA Caggers Fight Against MBNA's underhand tactics (page 11 post 210), may be relevant to your case;

let me expand slightly

 

The law as we all know requires a "A term stating the rate of any interest on the credit to be provided under the agreement"

 

So on the MBNA agreement it says £1000, £3000 & £5000 yes?

 

and under each amount of credit it says the various rates , Yes?

 

So what if your credit limit isnt there?

 

What if your credit limit was £10,000? £15,000 ???

 

there is nothing within the agreement to qualify the rate of interest if your credit limit isnt set out on the agreement? with me so far?

 

So MBNA may try and argue that the full details are found in a set of terms and conditions somewhere which we dont know about blah blah blah

 

Well that angle fails at the first hurdle as the Agreement Regulations , at Reg 2(4) requires all this info to be set out as a whole and not interspersed with other info so it cannot be set out elsewhere

 

so if your credit limit was different to that stated on your agreement KERCHING:wink:

 

does that help???????????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition, MBNA securitised a lot of their credit cards. If this is the case with your card, it would mean that MBNA do not have the right to take you to court or to sell the account to a DCA, as they are no longer the owners of the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...