Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Next Step : Re HFO Services


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Im just after a bit of advice please regading HFO services. Sorry if a bit long winded.

My partner received a letter from this company back in Feb 07 re an outstanding Barclaycard debt for £713.24. He agreed to payments of £32 a month which he said he would pay by postal orders by the 28th of each month. (didnt want to give out his card detail). He has kept to this arrangement and paid (as far as he was concerned) his last payment on january this year, I would like to add that we did miss a payment July 08 due to stresses of moving house, probably no excuse I know but we did make up for it. We have kept all but 2 postoffice receipts, misplaced the first couple of months not really realising how important they would be. We started this arrangement in Feb 07 (first postal order sent then) So In March 08 we receive a letter with heading (FAILED PAYMENT ARRANGEMENT PLEASE RESPOND IMMEDIATELY) Amount owing £694.59 we didnt bother, carried on paying instalements, could not stand to ring this company as felt like talking to a brick wall. once we got a phone call complaining about a missed payment that we had made early, apparantly this is not aloud!!! Not aloud to pay early, WTF!!!!

So next letter was received Oct 08 heading (FAILED PAYMENT - BREACH OF CONTRACT/FRAUD!!!!) Amount owing £518.97. Then in Nov 08 get a letter from Turnbull Rutherford Solicitorsk, this one says we owe £198.24. So in a month the account has gone down from £518.97 to £198.24!!! We again just ignored it. So in January after I had paid my final payment of £9 something I wrote them a letter stating this is my final payment and as far as Im concerened case closed! Well yesterday got another letter heading (NOTICE OF INTENDED ACTION) Amount owing £183.00 This letter says: We have tried to contact you recentley in connection with the offer that HFO has made to you in connection with this offer. To remind you, the HFO offer will give you a payment holiday until Feb 09 and will prevent all telephone calls and collection activity over the holiday period, provided that you call me on 08456006145. I can assure you that we want to help! The law says that both parties must attempt to resolve disputed debts. you are refusing to communicate with me and accordingly HFO will be able to demonstrate to the court that you are failing your duty. We now have confirmation of your residential status at this address and we are reviewing your case in anticipation of further action to esculate this matter, blah blah blah added fees etc etc.

We really dont know what to do next, this company do my head in. Should I contact the post office with details of these postal orders, get some evidence together or just ignore and wait till they take us to court and then just show all our receipts. I hope someone could give some advice please, sorry to waffle on.

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Time to treat this company like they treat you, with contempt.

 

First of all,

Did barclays send a default notice?

did HFO send a notice of assignment?

 

Next, find out if HFO have the right to be collecting this debt.

How old is the card (when did you first take it out)

 

If it's fairly old send off for a copy of your agreement. This is the letter to send:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html#post162367

 

don't sign the letter

send a £1 postal order and

send it recorded delivery

do not speak to them on the phone. if they ring, refuse to answer any security questions.

 

It may be worth sending barclays a SAR but hold off for now till others put their bit in.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks for your reply.

He can remember having a barclaycard and owing so yes It is his.

The thing is, is it too late to be sending off something to see if he owes it in the first place. As far as he is concerned he has payed this debt off. 22 payments of £32 and a final payment of ££9.24 all postal orders sent to HFO with account detail, address on the back etc. The letters they sent dont add up, seems they are just coming up with figures nilly willy! I do have most receipts from post office, they have £32 on them and a Payee as HFO services.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tricky one this. As you have been paying a "debt" and by your own account it is paid off, they shouldn't be hassling you again so maybe a prove it letter could work. I'll copy a template letter up but you should edit it to suit your need based on what you have already said. It shouldn't matter that you have paid previously

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Remember, don’t sign the letter.

 

 

If that doesn't work then you could send a SAR but don't worry about that just yet. don't forget to include that you have already paid this debt off.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi

My partner had a debt of around £700 (barclaycard) with this company which he admitted to and arranged monthly payments of £32 a month to pay it off. Our final payment was paid in January. All these payments were postal orders sent to the company on time. We have receipts of all payments except for 2 that are missing. This has taken him 2 years to pay off and along the way we had a few letters stating we hadnt kept up with the agreement and that as we hadnt we were comiting fraud etc etc. We ignored these as we knew we were making the payments on time and thought they were just trying to get more money out of us. They left us alone pretty much so along with the final payment I sent them a letter along the lines of "here is my final payment now leave us alone"!!! Now a month on or so he gets a letter saying " we wrote to you recentley about your failed payment plan and that your account if now being sent to the investigation team and the costs unfortunately need to be added to your account". This company are making us so cross, we are just at a loss of what to do next, they dont listen. As far as we are concerned we have

spend the last 2 years sending them monthly postal orders of £32. What should we do next. Should we ask for them to send us a statement of the account telling us what payments they think they have received?? Or should I contact the post office first and see if the postal orders have been cashed? Or should we just ignore and see if they take him to court?? Please help.

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...